JCU Logo

JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY

COURSE CODE: "PL 223-1"
COURSE NAME: "Comparative Politics"
SEMESTER & YEAR: Fall 2016
SYLLABUS

INSTRUCTOR: Michael Driessen
EMAIL: [email protected]
HOURS: MW 10:00 AM 11:15 AM
TOTAL NO. OF CONTACT HOURS: 45
CREDITS: 3
PREREQUISITES:
OFFICE HOURS: TTH 1:30-3:30pm

COURSE DESCRIPTION:
As both a subject and a method of study, comparative politics examines the nature, development, structure and functioning of the political systems of a selection of countries with very different cultures, social and economic profiles, political histories and geographic characteristics. Through case studies, students will learn to use the comparativist’s methods to collect and organize the information and develop general explanations.
SUMMARY OF COURSE CONTENT:

 

The course is divided into 3 sections which look at 1) Comparative Politics in Western Modernity; 2) Transitions, Revolutions and 3rd Wave Considerations; and 3) New Directions in Comparative Politics. Over 9 units, we will study 10 countries along a timeline and critically chart out how these states differ and converge in the ways in which they organize power and distribute goods to citizens. In order of appearance, they are Great Britain, Italy, USSR, USA, Chile, the Czech Republic, Congo, Iran, China, and Egypt. Each unit introduces one major 1)Regime Type; 2) Country Example 3) Political Idea or Theme. Along the way, the student will learn something about the dominant enduring topics of study of comparative politics, including liberalism, fascism, communism, democracy, democratic transitions, ethnic politics, civil war, political economies, identity politics, authoritarianisms, electoral systems, political parties and revolution.

LEARNING OUTCOMES:

My pedagogical hope is that students will finish this course equipped with a foundational set of tools to critically distinguish among modern political systems that will allow them to begin to analyze the relationships between the ideas, institutions, cultures and histories which underpin these systems. They will also learn the defining political characteristics of 10 modern nation-states. The essential goal will be to help students to begin practicing a higher level of political analysis and a more nuanced appreciation of the practical ways in which humans attempt to achieve common goods in modern times. When finished with this course students should expect to substantively answer the following questions about any nation: 1) what is the regime type? 2) what does the political economy look like? 3) What does the state look like? 4) What are the institutions, policies, and ideas that describe these three attributes? 5) Are there cultural, historical and religious affinities to all the above?   

TEXTBOOK:
Book TitleAuthorPublisherISBN numberLibrary Call NumberCommentsFormatLocal BookstoreOnline Purchase
Essentials of Comparative Politics, 5th Ed. (International Student Edition)O'NeilNorton9780393920741     
The Communist ManifestoMarx and EngelsSoHo9781453704424     
The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of CapitalismWeberPenguin0140439218     
REQUIRED RESERVED READING:
NONE

RECOMMENDED RESERVED READING:
NONE
GRADING POLICY
-ASSESSMENT METHODS:
AssignmentGuidelinesWeight
Mid-term Exam 20%
Final Exam 30%
Short Reflections (7)1 page each, on any reading or set of readings within a section of the course. Reading reflections must be turned by the date specified in the course calendar. 40%
ParticipationAttendance and Presence of Mind are mandatory for this class. The goal here is to advance towards the art of asking good questions. Quality, not quantity of participation is what counts, although some quantity is better than no quality. Students will be allowed 2 unexcused absences. Each unexcused absence thereafter will result in the lowering of the attendance grade by 1/3rd a letter grade. More than 12 unexcused absences may result in a failure to pass the course.10%

-ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
AWork of this quality directly addresses the question or problem raised and provides a coherent argument displaying an extensive knowledge of relevant information or content. This type of work demonstrates the ability to critically evaluate concepts and theory and has an element of novelty and originality. There is clear evidence of a significant amount of reading beyond that required for the cours
BThis is highly competent level of performance and directly addresses the question or problem raised.There is a demonstration of some ability to critically evaluatetheory and concepts and relate them to practice. Discussions reflect the student’s own arguments and are not simply a repetition of standard lecture andreference material. The work does not suffer from any major errors or omissions and provides evidence of reading beyond the required assignments.
CThis is an acceptable level of performance and provides answers that are clear but limited, reflecting the information offered in the lectures and reference readings.
DThis level of performances demonstrates that the student lacks a coherent grasp of the material.Important information is omitted and irrelevant points included.In effect, the student has barely done enough to persuade the instructor that s/he should not fail.
FThis work fails to show any knowledge or understanding of the issues raised in the question. Most of the material in the answer is irrelevant.

-ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Attendance and Presence of Mind are mandatory for this class. The goal here is to advance towards the art of asking good questions. Quality, not quantity of participation is what counts, although some quantity is better than no quality. Students will be allowed 2 unexcused absences. Each unexcused absence thereafter will result in the lowering of the attendance grade by 1/3rd a letter grade. More than 12 unexcused absences may result in a failure to pass the course.
ACADEMIC HONESTY
As stated in the university catalog, any student who commits an act of academic dishonesty will receive a failing grade on the work in which the dishonesty occurred. In addition, acts of academic dishonesty, irrespective of the weight of the assignment, may result in the student receiving a failing grade in the course. Instances of academic dishonesty will be reported to the Dean of Academic Affairs. A student who is reported twice for academic dishonesty is subject to summary dismissal from the University. In such a case, the Academic Council will then make a recommendation to the President, who will make the final decision.
STUDENTS WITH LEARNING OR OTHER DISABILITIES
John Cabot University does not discriminate on the basis of disability or handicap. Students with approved accommodations must inform their professors at the beginning of the term. Please see the website for the complete policy.

SCHEDULE

Course Outline:

Part I. Comparing Politics in Western Modernity

1. Modern Nation-States and the Rise of Political Liberalism

            Countries: England (and France)

2. Late Nation-State Builders and Liberalism in Crisis

            Countries: Italy (and Germany)

3. Liberalism in Crisis part II.

            Country: USSR

4. Liberal Revenge. 

            Country: USA

Part II. After the End of History: Transitions, Revolutions and 3rd Waves

5. 3rd Wave Transitions:

            Countries: Chile and the Czech Republic.

6. Identity Politics, Poverty, Civil War and Failed States

            Country: Congo

7. Theocracy and the Return of Religious Politics

            Country: Iran

8. Competitive Authoritarianism and Authoritarian Capitalism

            Country: China

Part III. New Directions:

9. Tahrir Square and the Future of Comparative Politics: Dealing with pluralism in the 21st century

            Country: Egypt

 

Course Calendar

 

August 29

Class 1

Course Introduction

 

Part I: Comparing Politics in Western Modernity

 

1. Modern Nation-States and the Rise of Political Liberalism: England (and France)

 

August 31

Class 2

 

O’Neil chapters 1 & 2

 

September 5

Class 3

 

 

Weber, The Protestant Ethic : First read chapters 1 & 2 (from part I “The Problem”): “Religious Affiliation and Social Stratification” and “The Spirit of Capitalism.”

Then read chapter 5, “Asceticism and the Spirit of Capitalism (from part II “The Vocational Ethic of Ascetic Protestantism”

September 7

Class 4

 

Fareed Zakaria, “A Brief History of Human Freedom,” Library Reserves  (chapter 1)

Recommended:

Fareed Zakaria, “Capitalism, not Culture, Drives Economics,”

J. S. Mill, On Liberty, chapters 1 & 2

September  12

Class 5

(Reading Reflection 1 Due)

 

O’Neil chapter 5

Magna Carta (skim)

France’s “Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen

2. Late Nation-State Builders and Liberalism in Crisis: Italy (and Germany)

September 14

Class 6

 

Mussolini, “The Doctrine of Fascism” (1932)

The Futurist Manifesto, and paintings

Leni Riefenstahl, “Triumph des Willens

 

September 19

Class 7

 

Alexander Gershenkron, “Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective,” (chapter 1)

Michael Mann, “A Political Theory of Nationalism and its Excesses,” chapter 4 in Notions of Nationalism, ed. S. Periwal 1995, available as e-book on JCU Library’s worldcat

 

3. Liberalism in Crisis part II: USSR

September 21

Class 8

(Reading Reflection 2 Due)

 

Marx and Engels, The Communist Manifesto (skip chapter III)

September 26

Class 9

 

Lenin, “The April Theses?”: & “Lessons of the Revolution

Stalin, “The Foundations of Leninism: The Dictatorship of the Proletariat,” chapter IV

Recommended: O’Neil Chapter 9, pp.s 270-286  

September 28

Class 10

Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago: Part I: ch.s 1&4; part III: ch. 7; part IV: ch.s 1-2; Part VI: ch.s 2&7. [These selections correspond to pages 218-240; 253-273; 294-306 in The Solzhenitsyn Reader: New and Essential Writings, 1947-2005 (ed.s Ericson, Jr. and Mahoney) available in the Library Reserves]

4. Liberal Revenge: USA

 

October 3

Class 11

(Reading Reflection 3 Due)

 

 

Francis Fukuyama, “The End of History

 

October 5

Class 12

 

Robert Putnam, “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital,” Journal of Democracy 6(1), 1995:

Read through Putnam’s survey instrument and data

Sheri Berman, “Understanding Social Democracy

 

October 10

Class 13

 

O’Neil Chapter 8

 

October 12

Class 14

Mid-term Exam

 

Part II: After the End of History: Transitions, Revolutions and 3rd Waves

 

5. 3rd Wave Transitions: Chile and the Czech Republic.

 

October 17

Class 15

 

 

Havel, “The Power of the Powerless,” sections I-X, XIV-XVI, XXI-XXII; and “New Year’s Address,” all in Open Letters: Selected Writings, 1965-1990:

 

October 19

Class 16

 

 

Samuel P. Huntington, “Democracy’s Third Wave,” Journal of Democracy, 2(2), 1991

 

Steven Levitsky and David Collier, “Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research,” World Politics, 49(3), 1997

 Pablo Neruda, “A Call for the Destruction of Nixon and Praise for Chilean Revolution

 

October 24

Class 17

 

 

O’Neil Chapter 9, pp.s 286-303

Valerie Bunce, “Rethinking Recent Democratization: Lessons from the Post-Communist Experience,” World Politics, 55, 2003

 

 

6. Identity Politics, Poverty, Civil War and Failed States: Congo

 

October 28

Class 18

(Reading Reflection 4 Due)

 

 

O’Neil chapter 10, pp.s 290-308 (in O’Neil 3rd Ed: ch. 9, pp.s 230-247)

Frantz Fanon, “Concerning Violence,” chapter 1 from The Wretched of the Earth, Library Reserves

Leopold Senghor, “To New York

 

 

October 31

Class 19

 

 

Economist, “Africa’s Great War,” http://www.economist.com/node/1213296?story_id=1213296

Filip Reyntjens, “Briefing: The Second Congo War: More than a Remake,” African Affairs, (98) 391, 1999

 

James Fearon and David Laitin, “Ethnicity, Insurgency and Civil WarAmerican Political Science Review (97) 1. 2003:

 

November 2

Class 20

 

O’Neil chapter 9, pp.s 247-259

Jeffery Sachs, The End of Poverty. 2005. Time Magazine Excerpt

 

William Easterly, “Was Development Assistance a Mistake?

 

Good News from Africa:

 

http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2012/05/daily-chart-12

 

http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2012/02/daily-chart-20

 

But the debate continues:

Damisa Moboyo (2009) “Dead Aid: Why Aid to Africa is not Working

And

Jeffery Sachs (2014) “The Case for Aid Foreign Policy

 

 

 

7. Theocracy and the Return of Religious Politics: Country: Iran

 

November 7

Class 21

(Reading Reflection 5 Due)

 

 

Economist, “In God’s Name,” (2007)

 

November 9

Class 22

 

 

Bernard Lewis, “The Roots of Muslim Rage,” The Atlantic, September (1990):

Michael L. Ross, “Does Oil Hinder Democracy?” World Politics, 53(3), 2001

 

November 14

Class 23

 

 

Vali Nasr, “The Rise of ‘Muslim Democracy,’” Journal of Democracy 16(2), 2005

Gunes Tezcur, “Democracy Promotion, Authoritarian Resiliency, and Political Unrest in Iran,” Democratization 19(1), 2012

try this link! https://myjcu.johncabot.edu/corso/HandlerFile.ashx?path=%252Fpublic/course/fb/11609/tezcur.demoz.iran.pdf

 

8. Competitive Authoritarianism and Authoritarian Capitalism: China

 

November 16

Class 24

(Reading Reflection 6 Due)

 

O’Neil chapter 6

Steven Levitsky and Lucan Way, “The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism,Journal of Democracy, 12(2), 2002

Ivan Krastev, “The Rules of Survival,” The Journal of Democracy, (April), 2009

 

November 21

Class 25

 

 

Azar Gat, “The Return of Authoritarian Great Powers,” Foreign Affairs (86)4, 2007

Thomas Friedman, “Advice for China

 

Amnesty International, “Annual Report: China 2015

 

Part III. New Directions:

 

9. Tahrir Square and the Future of Comparative Politics: Egypt

 

November 23

Class 26

(Reading Reflection 7 Due)

 

O’Neil chapter 11

Economist, “Has the Arab Spring Failed” Special Report (2013)

Samer Shehata, “In Egypt, Democrats v. Liberals” July 2nd, 2013, New York Times

 

November 28

Class 27

 

Ivan Krastev, “Russian Revisionism: Russia’s Plan for Overturning the European Order.” Foreign Affairs (2014)

Jason Willick, “Nationalists and Cosmopolitans: How Samuel Huntington Predicted our Political Moment,” American Interest (2016)

Charles Lister, “Profiling the Islamic State,” Brooking Institute Doha (2014)

 

 

November 30

Class 28

Conclusions and Review

 

 

Final Exam