GRADING POLICY
-ASSESSMENT METHODS:
| Assignment | Guidelines | Weight |
| Participation | Active participation is expected of all students, but the level or amount of your engagement is graded. Although participation is only 5% of the course grade it could ensure an A rather than an A- as your final grade. Participating means coming to class having read the week’s assignment (listed in the schedule below), prepared to ask and answer questions and to share any pertinent observations. Remember too that the more you engage, the more interesting the class will be not only for you but also for everyone else (me included). | 5% |
| Quizzes | 6 quizzes will be given in the course of the term (the dates will be inserted in the final course schedule.) The quiz with the lowest score will be omitted from the final tally; the remaining 5 quizzes are therefore each worth 5% of the course grade. Each quiz will consist in a series of questions on specific areas, monument types (including individual structural or stylistic features), individual monuments or sets of monuments in Ancient Rome. They are designed to assess your knowledge of essential facts and your ability to critically interpret and asses their historical significance. You may be asked the name of an area or monument, its location, its date, its function, its patronage; you may also be asked to describe it (main physical characteristics, structural and decorative components, materials used, etc); or you may be asked to a question on some aspect of its historical significance (e.g. the possible motivations for designating an area of the city with specific functions or the intended meaning- political, religious, social aesthetic, etc.- of individual monuments). The questions will be based on material that we have already covered in class, but completing the required reading is necessary to pass each and every quiz. Answers to individual questions should always be brief: in some cases one or two words or word or a short phrase will suffice and no answer should require more than two or three sentences. Depending on the quiz, you will be given anywhere from 5 to 10 minutes to answer.
| 25% |
| Presentation | The presentation consists of two parts:
1. a 15 minute oral report to the class (please time yourself beforehand =shorter or longer presentations to be avoided) on a monument or artwork. On the day of presentation you must also submit: a 1-2 page handout to all members of the class (including me) consisting of an outline of indicating the key points of your presentation and a bibliography.
2. a short paper (1500 words- c. 4-5 double spaced pages) consisting of your presentation elaborated in the form of a formal essay. The papers are due 2 classes after your oral delivery. They must be submitted in both hard copy and sent electronically.
The presentation itself with the class handout (50%) and the short paper (50%) are the basis of your grade.
Presentaion guidelines will be provided and discussed during class 2.
| 25% |
| Mid-term and Final exams | The mid-term and final exams take place on campus (see Course schedule). Like the quizzes they are designed to assess your knowledge of essential facts about specific areas, monument types, individual monuments or sets of monuments in Ancient Rome and your ability to critically interpret and asses their historical significance. The mid-term covers material studied . The final is cumulative, although with a greater emphasis on material studied after the mid-term
Both exams consist in:
-6 slide identifications 5 minutes each, worth 30% of your exam grade (5% each). Name, typology, date, media, (original) location, function, and patronage must be specified as known or relevant. E.g. the Colosseum does not, strictly speaking, have a subject, but the marble friezes on the Ara Pacis do; a portrait statue of Augustus is just that, but the emperor may be depicted as young, middle-aged or old, may be dressed in civilian, priestly or military garb (or combinations...) and these kinds of visual elements must be both mentioned and described (e.g. what visual devices are employed to represent Augustus made to look youthful? what iconographic elements denote that he is officiating as a priest?). Last but not least, you must indicate at least one reason the topographical area, monument or artwork was significant in its original historical context. For example in addition to noting that the Colosseum was built by Vespasian on the site of the artificial lake in Nero's Domus Aurea complex, you should explain (however briefly) that the location was very significant from a symbolic (and propagandistic) point of view since it transformed imperial property destined for the private enjoyment of Nero to a public venue destined for the entertainment of all Roman citizens. Similarly, in addition describing how a portrait of Augustus depicts him as young, you should mention that all his portraits show him a young and discuss (however briefly) what message was being conveyed by this representation of " eternal" youth....An identification which lists a complete series of correct facts, but fails to discuss why they are significant, will score lower than one that is missing a few facts but which includes an assessment of historical significance.
-4 slide comparisons 10 minutes each, worth 40% of the exam grade. One or more images of two sites or monuments will be shown to you. You must identify each one (again name, typology, date, media, (original) location, function, patronage, but also (and most importantly) consider them in relation to one another: i.e. discuss significant similarities and differences (see guidelines for comparisons under mid-term above).
-1 essay 30 minutes, worth 30% of the exam grade. A week before each exam you will be given 2 essay questions accompanied by images of sites and/or monuments. One of the two will be on exam. However, the other topic will undoubtedly show up in the identifications and comparisons, so be sure to prepare for both. | 45% (mid-term 20%; final 25%) |
-ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
AWork of this quality directly addresses the question or problem raised and provides a coherent argument displaying an extensive knowledge of relevant information or content. This type of work demonstrates the ability to critically evaluate concepts and theory and has an element of novelty and originality. There is clear evidence of a significant amount of reading beyond that required for the cours
BThis is highly competent level of performance and directly addresses the question or problem raised.There is a demonstration of some ability to critically evaluatetheory and concepts and relate them to practice. Discussions reflect the student’s own arguments and are not simply a repetition of standard lecture andreference material. The work does not suffer from any major errors or omissions and provides evidence of reading beyond the required assignments.
CThis is an acceptable level of performance and provides answers that are clear but limited, reflecting the information offered in the lectures and reference readings.
DThis level of performances demonstrates that the student lacks a coherent grasp of the material.Important information is omitted and irrelevant points included.In effect, the student has barely done enough to persuade the instructor that s/he should not fail.
FThis work fails to show any knowledge or understanding of the issues raised in the question. Most of the material in the answer is irrelevant.
-ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS:
All scheduled classes are mandatory. Because this is an on-site course that occasionally includes special scheduled permits to sites and museums it has strict time limitations. You must, therefore always be punctual. Class will always start promptly and it is your responsibility to find out where the meeting places are. You may ask me in advance, but no later than during the previous class. I will not respond to last minute emails or phone calls. Coarelli, F. (2007) Rome and Environs. An Archeological Guide (your textbook!) has many useful maps to locate sites. For subway and bus lines consult www.atac. it (available in English).
|
|
1. Mon. July 6
Meeting place:
|
Introduction to course: content, methodology, requirements, logistics, etc.
JCU
Rome's foundation: topography and mythology/ Architectural typologies and building materials (on site)
|
|
2. Tues. July 7
Meeting place:
Required reading:
Suggested Reading:
|
Rome's foundation: topography and mythology, cont.
Forum Boarium, by Round Temple
Coarelli (2007): 1-9 (Introduction), 348-50 (Tiber Island), 307-10 (intro. F Holitorium, et al), 315-19 (Portus Tiberinus, T Portunus and Ara Maxima Hercules), 323-27 (Circus Maximus); 130-33 (intro. Palatine), 28-32 (intro. Capitoline), 332-335 (intro Aventine); Claridge (2010): 39-61 (building materials and techniques, architectural orders and dimensions, building types) xeroxing the pages from Claridge is strongly recommended, as they will come in handy throughout course
Coulston and Dodge in Coulston and Dodge 2000: introduction to archeology and topography of Rome; Elsner (1998), Ch. 2 ("A Visual Culture"); Kleiner (1992): 1-17 (Introduction); Stamper (2005): 6-10 (Introduction and Ch. 1)
Discussion of Presentation Guidelines
|
|
3. Wed. July 8
Meeting place:
Required reading:
Suggested Reading:
|
Monuments and identity: Kings to Early Republic
Palatine Hill entrance on Via di San Gregorio
Coarelli (2007): 130-38 (intro. Palatine, Iron Age huts, western temples), 42-47 (intro R Forum), 91-92 (Archaic cemetery), 81-89 (Via Sacra, Regia, T Vesta, House Vestal Virgins), 50-57 (Shrine Venus Cloacina, Comitium, Curia Hostilia, Black Stone); Stamper (2005): 6-10 (Kings of Rome)
Smith in Coulston and Dodge (2000), esp. 24-35: early and Archaic Rome
*Quiz 1: architectural orders /
Roman use of architectural orders
|
|
4. Thurs. July 9
Meeting place:
Required reading:
Suggested Reading:
|
Monuments and identity: Kings to Early Republic, cont.
Capitoline Hill, by Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius
Coarelli (2007): 28-36 (intro. Capitoline, T JOM, Area Capitolina), 65-66 (T Saturn), 74-77 (T Castor and Pollux and Juturna), 40 (T Juno Moneta, Auguraculum); Stamper (2005): Ch. 1 & 2 (T JOM) and 34-40 (early Republican R Forum)
Cornell in Coulston and Dodge (2000): Rome in the Mid-Republic
Sign up for presentations
|
|
5. Mon. July 13
Meeting place:
Required reading:
Suggested Reading:
|
Republican Rome:
triumphs and temples honor and fame
Largo Argentina, by Feltrinelli Bookstore
Coarelli (2007): 260-67 (intro C Martius, Circus Flaminius), 270-71 (T Apollo Sosianus and T Bellona), 275-80 (Area Sacra), 289-90 (Saepta Julia), 307-10 (intro. F Holitorium, et al), 313-19 (Temples F Holitorium, T Portunus and Round T); Stamper (2005): 44-48 (Area Sacra Largo Argentina), 49-50 (triumph, victory temples), 53-56 (temples southern Campus Martius), 59-68 (temples F Holitorium, T Portunus), 68-81 (Round T, Area Sacra Largo Argentina)
Beard (2007), esp. 42-53, 92-106: triumphal route/culture; Cornell in Coulston and Dodge (2000): Rome in the Mid-Republic; Flower (2004): 326-31, 338-40 (triumphs, spectacle & politics); Orlin (1997): Republican temples & politics; Patterson (1992): Rome topography Republic to Empire; Pollitt (1986): 41-43, 158 (Portico Metellus); Shelton (1998): 251-52, 329-31: triumphs & spectacles; Ziokowski (1988): Round T
Presentations:
1. Round Temple in the Forum Boarium
*Quiz 2: Roman Forum Valley: Constructing a communal identity 7th – early 6th century BC (kings)
|
|
6. Tues. July 14
Meeting place:
Required reading:
Suggested Reading:
|
Monumentalizing Rome in the Late Republic:
Pompey, Caesar and Augustus
Piazza Farnese, by fountain on left side (when facing Palazzo Farnese)
Coarelli (2007): 283-285 (Theatre Pompey),103-113 (F Caesar, F Augustus); Kleiner (1992): 59-61 (intro Augustus and Augustan art) and 99-103 (F Augustus); Stamper (2005): 84-102 (Theatre Pompey, F of Caesar) and 105- 108 (intro to Augustus) and 130-141 (F of Augustus)
Coleman in Coulston and Dodge (2000), pp. 219-227: (entertainment/ theatres); DeRose Evans (2009): Sculpture Theatre Pompey; Galinsky(1996):197-213 (Forum of Augustus); Gleason (1994): portico/theatre of Pompey; Kellum (1997): esp. 164-7 (F Augustus); Kuttner (1999): Theatre Pompey; Packer in Ewald and Noreña (2010): 135-60 (Theatre Pompey); Patterson (1992): Rome topography Republic to Empire; Von Blanckenhagen (1954) Imperial Fora; Walker in Coulston and Dodge 2000: 61-75 (Augustan patronage); Ward Perkins (1981): Ch. 1 ("Augustan Rome"); Zanker (1988), 185-215 (F Augustus)
Presentations:
2. Theatre of Pompey
3. Forum of Augustus and temple of Mars Ultor
|
|
7. Wed. July 15
Meeting place:
Required reading:
Suggested reading:
|
The Roman Forum during the reigns of Caesar and Augustus: power and dynasty monumentalized
Roman Forum entrance on Via dei Fori Imperiali
Coarelli (2007): 42-54 (R Forum overview, Bas. Aemilia, Porticus Gaius & Lucius, Comitium), 57-59 (Curia), 64-5 (Rostra), 71-75 (Bas. Julia, T Castor and Pollux), 79-81 (Divus Iulius, Arch of Augustus), Stamper (2005): 103-104 (Caesarian R Forum), 105-111 (Divus Iulius), 141-150 (R Forum at end of Augustus reign)
Gurval (1997): Divus Julius/Comet; Patterson (1992): Rome topography Republic to Empire; Rose (2005): esp. 28-36 (Parthian Arch/ Arch of Augustus); Walker in Coulston and Dodge 2000: 61-75 (Augustan patronage); Ward Perkins (1981): Ch. 1 ("Augustan Rome");
Presentations:
4. Curia Julia
5. Temple to the Deified Julius Caesar
6. Parthian Arch (Coarelli’s Augustan Arch)
*Quiz 3: Victory Temples
|
|
8. Thurs. July16
Meeting place:
Required reading:
Suggested reading:
|
Self-representation: portraiture from the Late Republic to Augustus/ The Garden Fresco from the villa of Livia at Prima Porta
Palazzo Massimo entrance (Piazza dei Cinquecento, by Termini)
Kleiner (1992): Ch. 1: 31-47 (Republican Portraiture), Ch. 2, 59-69 (intro to Augustus and Augustan portraiture), 75-89 (Augustan female portraiture and freedmen portraits)
Christ (1997); toga/ togate portraits; Fejfer (2009): Roman portraits, esp. Part I (honorific portraiture), 181-213 (male body types), 262-270 (Republican portraiture), and 331-426 (imperial portraiture); Galinsky (1996): 164-79 (Augustan portraits); Kellum (1994): garden fresco; Kleiner (1992): Ch. 3: 123-141 (Julio-Claudian portraiture); Rose in Bell and Hansen 2008 (Republican portraits); Stevenson (1998): honorific nude portrait statues; Smith (1981): Republican Portraits; Smith (1996): Augustan portraiture; Strong (1988): Preface to the First Edition and Ch. 1 ("The Beginnings"), Ch. 2 (The Mid and Late Republic), Ch. 4 (Transitions to the Empire and Augustus); Wallace-Hadrill (1993): 81-85 (Augustus); Zanker (1988): Introduction, Ch. 1, esp. 5-25, Ch. 2, esp. 33-65, and. Ch. 3 (Late Republican portraits/ Augustan portraits)
Review for mid-term exam
|
|
9. Mon. July 20
Meeting Place:
|
MID-TERM EXAM
JCU
|
|
10.Tues. July 21
Meeting Place:
Required reading:
Suggested reading:
|
The Campus Martius in the Age of Augustus
Side of the Ara Pacis Museum by inscription opposite Mausoleum of Augustus
Coarelli (2007): 299-304 (Ara Pacis and Mausoleum); Kleiner (1992): 59-61 (intro to Augustus and Augustan art), 90-99 (Ara Pacis and Mausoleum)
Clarke (2003): 19-28 (monuments northern C Martius); Davies (2000): 13-19, 76-78 (horologium) 137-42 (mausoleum); Galinsky (1996): 84-88 (virtues, cf. Romulus/Aeneas), 139-55 (Ara Pacis); Kleiner and Buxton (2008): Ara Pacis; Holliday (1990): Ara Pacis; Heslin (2007): horologium; Patterson (1992): Rome topography Republic to Empire; Rose (1990): Ara Pacis; Strong (1988): 80-84 (Ara Pacis); Walker in Coulston and Dodge 2000: 61-75 (Augustan patronage); Ward Perkins (1981): Ch. 1 ("Augustan Rome"); Zanker (1988), esp. 72-75, 139-43, 156-9, 172-83 (Augustan C Martius)
Presentations
7. Mausoleum of Augustus
8. Horologium (aka Augustan ‘sundial’)
|
|
11.Wed. July 22
Meeting Place:
Required Reading:
Suggested reading:
|
The Campus Martius in the Age of Augustus, cont./ Nero’s Domus Aurea
Pantheon, by fountain in central square
Coarelli (2007): 267-272 (Theater Marcellus, T Apollo Sosianus, Portico Octavia), 285-286 (Baths of Agrippa), 159-160 (intro Col. Valley), 177-186 (intro Esquilne and Domus Aurea), 164-172; Stamper (2005): 119-125 (Temple of Apollo Sosianus, Portico of Octavia)
Albertson (2001): Colossus Nero; Coleman in Coulston and Dodge (2000), 219-227 (entertainment/ theatres); Marlowe (2006): 225-9 (Colossus of Nero); Strong (1988) 122- 125 (Domus Aurea); Thomas (1996): Pantheon Agrippa to S Severus; Ward Perkins (1981): 56-61 (Domus Aurea); Welch (2007), 147-62 (Domus Aurea and Colosseum); Zanker (1988), esp. 72-75, 139-43, 156-9, 172-83 (Augustan C Martius)
Presentations
9. Colossus of Nero
|
|
12.Thurs. July 23
Meeting Place:
Required Reading:
Suggested reading:
|
The re-shaping of central Rome under the Flavians
Metro stop Colosseo (B line): by Roman sarcophagus (past newspaper stand)
Coarelli (2007): 159-160 (intro Col. Valley), 164-172 (Col., Ludus Magnus), 125-128 (T Peace), 113-115 (F Transistorium), Kleiner (1992): 167-173 (intro Civil War AD 68-69 and Flavian Dynasty), 179-81 (sculptural display T Peace), 192-194 (F Transistorium); Stamper (2005): 151 (intro Flavians), 156-159 (T Peace), 159 (intro Titus and Domitian), 161-168 (F Transistorium)
Anderson (1982): T Peace and F Transistorium; Noreña (2003) T of Peace; Pollard (2009): T Peace; Taub (1993): Forma Urbis; Ward Perkins (1981): 63-84 (Flavian architecture); Welch (2007), 147-62 (Domus Aurea and Colosseum); Zanker in Ewald and Noreña (2010): esp. 66-78, 81-87 (buildings for games)
Presentations
10. Colosseum
11. Temple of Peace
*Quiz 4: Augustan Campus Martius
|
|
13. Mon. July 27
Meeting Place:
Required Reading:
Suggested reading:
|
The re-shaping of central Rome under the Flavians, cont.
Roman Forum entrance on Via dei Fori Imperiali
Coarelli (2007): 66-67 (T Vespasian & Titus), 97-88 (Arch of Titus), 145-154 (Domitian’s Palace); Kleiner (1992): 183-190 (Arch of Titus); Stamper (2005): 151-156 (Flavian rebuilding of JOM), 159-161 (T Vespasian & Titus), 168-172 (Arch of Titus and Capitoline)
Davies 2000: 19-27, 67-71, 142-48 (Arch of Titus); Strong (1988) 127-131 (Arch of Titus); Thomas (2004): Equus Domitiani and Domitan patronage R Forum area; Ward Perkins (1981): 63-84 (Flavian architecture)
Presentations
12. Equus Domitiani (equestrian statue of Domitian)
13. Arch of Titus
|
|
14. Tues. July 28
Meeting Place:
Required Reading:
Suggested reading:
|
Imperial Fora (at Museum of the Fori imperiali in Trajan's markets)/ Trajan's Markets and Forum Complex
Entrance Museum of the Fori Imperiali (Via IV Novembre 94; ascend stairs behind Column of Trajan and take a right)
Coarelli (2007): 115-125 (Trajan's F and markets); Kleiner (1992): 212-223 (sculpture in Trajan's F); Stamper (2005): Ch. 10 (Trajan's F)
Clarke (2003): 28-41 (Forum and Column of Trajan); Coulston (2003): Forum/column of Trajan);Davies (1997) and (2000): 127-135 (column of Trajan); Packer (2001): Trajan's F (see for plans and reconstructions); Strong (1988): 141-153 (Trajan's F); Von Blanckenhagen (1954) "The Imperial Fora"; Ward Perkins (1981): 84-95 (Trajan's patronage in Rome) and Ch 4 ("Materials and Methods: The Roman Architectural Revolution") ; Zanker in Ewald and Noreña 2010: esp 48-60, 75-81, 84-87 (porticoes and public spaces).
Presentations:
14. Trajan's Markets
15. Trajan’s Column
|
|
15. Wed. July 29
Meeting Place:
Required Reading:
Suggested reading:
|
The representation of the imperial persona: Trajan to Marcus Aurelis
Capitoline Hill by equestrian statue of Marcus Aurelius
Kleiner (1992): 207-212 (intro to Trajan; portraiture of Trajan and Plotina) 237-42 (intro to Hadrian; portraiture Hadrian and Sabina), 253-56 (Arco di Portogallo Reliefs and Adventus Relief), 267-80 (intro Antonines and Antonine portraiture), 283-85 (intro Antonine State Releifs and Hadrianeum reliefs), 288-95 (Marcus Aurelius Reliefs)
Fejfer (2009): Roman portraits, esp. Part I (honorific portraiture) and 331-426 (imperial portraiture); Hughes (2009): Province Reliefs Hadrianeum; Smith (1985): imperial portraiture; Strong (1988): 159-62 (Trajanic portraiture), 171-82 (Hadrianic portraiture and relief sculpture), 200-01 (Aurelian relief panels), 211-14 (Antonine portraiture)
*Quiz 5: Trajan's Forum
|
|
16. Thurs. July 30
Meeting Place:
Required Reading:
Suggested reading:
|
Hadrianic and Antonine Monumental Patronage
Temple of Venus and Roma (on Colosseum side, by steps to platform on right)
Coarelli (2007): 98-99 (T Venus & Roma), 286-89 (Pantheon), 291-93 (Hadrianeum), 296-99 (columns M. Aurelius and A. Pius); Kleiner (1992): 283-85 (Hadrianeum), 295-301 (column M. Aurelius); Stamper (2005): Ch. 11 (Pantheon) and 212-14 (Hadrianeum), 206-212 (T Venus and Roma)
Boatwright in Ewald and Noreña (2010): 169-74, 186-96 (Hadrianeum, columns A. Pius & M. Aurelius); Clarke (2003): 42-53 (column M. Aurelius); Davies (2000): 34-48, 79-83 and 158-171 (Mausoleum Hadrian, Pantheon, columns A. Pius and M. Aurelius); Elsner (1998): 63-73; Hughes (2009): Province Reliefs from Hadrianeum; Pirson (1996): column of M. Aurelius; Strong (1988): 206-11 (column M. Aurelius); Thomas (1996): Pantheon Agrippa to S Severus; Ward-Perkins (1981): Ch 4 ("Materials and Methods: The Roman Architectural Revolution) and 111-18 (Pantheon)
Presentations:
16. Column of Marcus Aurelius
|
|
17. Mon. Aug. 3
Meeting Place:
Required Reading:
Suggested reading:
|
The representation of the imperial persona:
Septimius Seveus to Constantine/ Monuments of Severan Rome
Capitoline Hill by equestrian statue of Marcus Aurelius
Coarelli (2007): 60-63 (Arch S Severus); Kleiner (1992): 316-29 (intro to Severans and Severan portraiture), 357-384 (intro. 3rd cent. and 3rd cent. portraiture), 433-444 (Constantinian portraiture)
Brilliant (1967): Arch S Severus; Clarke (2003): Ch. 2, esp. 53-67 (Arches of S. Severus and Constantine); Harrison (1967): Constantinian portraiture; Lusnia in Dillon and Welch 2009 (Arch of S. Severus); Smith (1997): early 4th century imperial portraiture; Strong (1988): 218-222 (Severan reliefs); Wright (1987) Portraiture of Constantine
Presentations:
17. Arch of Septimius Severus
Quiz 6: Hadrianic and Antonine State Reliefs
|
|
18. Tues. Aug. 4
Meeting Place:
Required Reading:
Suggested reading:
|
Monuments of Severan Rome, cont.
Forum Boarium, by Round Temple
Coarelli (2007): 320 (Arch of the Argentarii) 155 (Septizodium), 327-331 (Baths of Caracalla); Kleiner (1992): 334-339 (Arch of the Argentarii, Baths of Caracalla)
Elsner (2005): Arch Argentarii; Gorrie (2004): esp. p. 61-68 (Severan patronage); Lusnia (2004): Septizodium; Marvin (1983): Sculptures Baths Caracalla; Piranomonte (2012): Baths of Caracalla; Zajac (1999): bathing; Zanker in Ewald and Noreña 2010: esp. 61-66, 75-81, 84-87 (imperial baths).
Presentations:
18. Arch of the Argentarii
|
|
19. Wed. Aug. 5
Meeting Place:
Required Reading:
Suggested reading:
|
Monuments in Rome under the Tetrarchy and Constantine
Roman Forum Entrance on Via dei Fori Imperiali
Coarelli (2007): 59-60 (focus on Tetrarchic decennalia monument), 89-91 (T Romulus), 95-97 (Basilica Maxentius), 160-163 (Arch Constantine); Kleiner (1992): 413-17 (Decennalia monument), 445-55 (Arch Constantine; on the reliefs of the Arch see also see also pp. 251-53 and 288-95)
Clarke (2003): Ch. 2, esp. 53-67 (Arches of S. Severus and Constantine) Marlowe (2006): Arch Constantine; Peirce (1989): Arch of Constantine; Strong (1988): 264-266 (Tetrarchs), 276-278 (Arch Constantine); Ward-Perkins (1981): 426-430 (Basilica Nova, T Divus Romulus, Arch Constantine); Wilson Jones (2000): Arch Constantine
|
|
20.Thurs. Aug.6
Meeting Place:
|
Review for Final Exam
JCU
|
|
Friday Aug. 7
|
********Final EXAM at JCU**********
Time and classroom TBA
|
|