JCU Logo

JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY

COURSE CODE: "EN 110-6"
COURSE NAME: "Advanced Composition"
SEMESTER & YEAR: Spring 2015
SYLLABUS

INSTRUCTOR: Conor Deane
EMAIL: [email protected]
HOURS: MW 10:00 AM 11:15 AM
TOTAL NO. OF CONTACT HOURS: 45
CREDITS: 3
PREREQUISITES: Prerequisite: Placement via JCU English Composition Placement Exam or completion of either EN 103 or EN 105 with a grade of C or above
OFFICE HOURS:

COURSE DESCRIPTION:

Be persuasive,  not loud

Human knowledge grows out of an engagement in debate over what may be considered "true," "real," or "right".   EN 110 Advanced Composition aims to engage the course participants in critical thinking and debate so as to further develop their capacity of crafting a written argument and which will constitute their contribution to the aforementioned debate. 



The more each student is able to improve their engagement, the better he/she will be at thinking critically, reasoning, making choices, and weighing evidence in the work of others, and consequently their own. 

SUMMARY OF COURSE CONTENT:

Elements covered on the EN 110 Advanced Composition course include:
 
-thesis development;
-critical reading;
-organizing and outlining;
-paraphrasing and summarizing;
-citation and documentation standards.
-library use and other research facilities/resources.

In addition to regular in-and out-of-class reading and writing assignments,  course participants are required to write a fully documented research paper.

Prerequisite: Placement via JCU English Composition Placement Exam OR completion of EN 103 with a grade of C or above OR completion of EN 105 with a grade of C- or above.

Students must receive a grade of C or above in this course to fulfill the University’s English Composition requirement and to be eligible to take courses in English literature.

LEARNING OUTCOMES:

Who am I?  Who am I writing for? What do I want to achieve?

Course participants will build on their ability to write well-organized argumentative research papers through improved academic research.

During EN 110 Advanced Composition we will work on four main aspects:

1. Focus on organization.
This includes paragraph unity and development, logical progression of ideas, and the effectiveness of the introduction and conclusion. If necessary, a review of the writing process  (pre-writing, planning, writing, editing and proof reading) will be covered. 

2. Evaluation of content.   
This includes the further development of clarity and coherence of their paper's thesis.  The strength and appropriateness of supporting details, and the depth of the student’s insight into the topic.

3. Consistant Style
This is communicted through tone and word choice, as well as varied sentence structures and vocabulary to maintain interest. Clarity of diction and syntax is essential. The tone should be consistent and appropriate.

4.  Attention to mechanics
Grammar, punctuation, spelling, and correct application of appropriate conventions are all fundamental.Be persuasive,  not loud

Human knowledge grows out of an engagement in debate over what may be considered "true," "real," or "right".   EN 110 Advanced Composition aims to engage the course participants in critical thinking and debate so as to further develop their capacity of crafting a written argument and which will constitute their contribution to the aforementioned debate. 

The more each student is able to improve their engagement, the better he/she will be at thinking critically, reasoning, making choices, and weighing evidence in the work of others, and consequently their own. 

TEXTBOOK:
NONE
REQUIRED RESERVED READING:
NONE

RECOMMENDED RESERVED READING:
NONE
GRADING POLICY
-ASSESSMENT METHODS:
AssignmentGuidelinesWeight
Process (research proposal, preperatory bibliography, explanatory essay, initial outline) 40
Product (first draft, final paper) 40
Class participation 15
Oral 5

-ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
AWork of this quality directly addresses the question or problem raised and provides a coherent argument displaying an extensive knowledge of relevant information or content. This type of work demonstrates the ability to critically evaluate concepts and theory and has an element of novelty and originality. There is clear evidence of a significant amount of reading beyond that required for the course
BThis is highly competent level of performance and directly addresses the question or problem raised.There is a demonstration of some ability to critically evaluatetheory and concepts and relate them to practice. Discussions reflect the student’s own arguments and are not simply a repetition of standard lecture andreference material. The work does not suffer from any major errors or omissions and provides evidence of reading beyond the required assignments.
CThis is an acceptable level of performance and provides answers that are clear but limited, reflecting the information offered in the lectures and reference readings.
DThis level of performances demonstrates that the student lacks a coherent grasp of the material.Important information is omitted and irrelevant points included.In effect, the student has barely done enough to persuade the instructor that s/he should not fail.
FThis work fails to show any knowledge or understanding of the issues raised in the question. Most of the material in the answer is irrelevant.

-ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS:

Students are required to attend all scheduled class meetings and to participate in all classroom activities. In addition to this weighting of attendance, students are allowed only two absences (no questions asked, no excuse needed). However, each additional absence beyond the two allowed will result in the reduction in the final grade for the course by at least 5%. Students with more than five absences, beyond the two allowed, will automatically fail the course (receive a grade of F).  Students arriving to class after attendance has been taken will be counted as absent. Students arriving to class after the beginning of class, but before attendance has been taken, will be counted as late.  Two late arrivals will count as an absence. Please refer to the JCU catalog for the attendance and absence policies.Be persuasive,  not loud

Human knowledge grows out of an engagement in debate over what may be considered "true," "real," or "right".   EN 110 Advanced Composition aims to engage the course participants in critical thinking and debate so as to further develop their capacity of crafting a written argument and which will constitute their contribution to the aforementioned debate. 

The more each student is able to improve their engagement, the better he/she will be at thinking critically, reasoning, making choices, and weighing evidence in the work of others, and consequently their own. 

ACADEMIC HONESTY
As stated in the university catalog, any student who commits an act of academic dishonesty will receive a failing grade on the work in which the dishonesty occurred. In addition, acts of academic dishonesty, irrespective of the weight of the assignment, may result in the student receiving a failing grade in the course. Instances of academic dishonesty will be reported to the Dean of Academic Affairs. A student who is reported twice for academic dishonesty is subject to summary dismissal from the University. In such a case, the Academic Council will then make a recommendation to the President, who will make the final decision.
STUDENTS WITH LEARNING OR OTHER DISABILITIES
John Cabot University does not discriminate on the basis of disability or handicap. Students with approved accommodations must inform their professors at the beginning of the term. Please see the website for the complete policy.

SCHEDULE

Lesson 

Topic

Activity

Homework

1

Introduction

Course requirements. (syllabus, books)

TBA

2

Identifying  a topic, organisation and goal setting                  - writing research papers (WRP)      chap 2, 3)

Sample reading activities

At home response to reading









Evaluating sources WRP 8





Worksheet activities









Write a 500 word proposal Submit reviewed proposal









Gathering Sources outside the library - WRP 4









Peer review of proposal













Revision of Proposal

















5  

Gathering Sources inside the library

Library Visit









6





 Writing Effective Notes and Creating Outlines

WRP Ch. 9

                       

In-class response to reading 1









Reading activity

Conducting Resarch MLA Handbook 1.4

Annotated Bibliography





8

Looking at Paradigms WRP

Worksheet activities





















9

The outline WRP 9

Write a basic outline

Write a formal detailed outline

10 

Effective notetaking WRP 9

Revision of formal outline





11 

Academic Writing WRP 10









12 

Blending MLA style WRP 11+14





Study for MLA style Test

















13 

Understanding and avoiding plagiarism WRP 7

MLA style test





14 

The writing process WRP 12

Worksheet activities





15

The writing process WRP 12

Worksheet activities





16 

TBA





Write Draft - 2000 words

















17 

Editing and revisions

WRP 13

Revision of Draft

Write final paper

18 

Editing and revisions









19 

Editing and revisions









20

Wrap up

Final Class - Collect final papers - late papers are not accepted