JCU Logo

JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY

COURSE CODE: "PH 101"
COURSE NAME: "Introduction to Philosophical Thinking"
SEMESTER & YEAR: Fall 2014
SYLLABUS

INSTRUCTOR: David Levy
EMAIL: [email protected]
HOURS: TTH 10:00 AM 11:15 AM
TOTAL NO. OF CONTACT HOURS: 45
CREDITS: 3
PREREQUISITES:
OFFICE HOURS: after class or by appointment

COURSE DESCRIPTION:
This course aims to provide an introduction, through selections from classic and contemporary texts, to some critical philosophical problems. 
SUMMARY OF COURSE CONTENT:
I. Justice

Plato, Republic, Book I

II. Knowledge and relativism

Plato, Theaetetus, selections
Descartes, Discourse on Method, on clear and distinct ideas
Pascal, Pensées, on the spirit of geometry vs. the spirit of delicacy


III. Soul and body

Lucretius, On the Nature of Things, III. 94-416
Aristotle, On the Soul, selections
Descartes, Discourse on Method, selection
Steven Pinker, How the Mind Works, pp. 64-69; The Blank Slate, pp. 30-34, 223-240
Leon Kass, The Hungry Soul, ch. 1

IV. Miracles

David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, 10
C.S. Lewis, Miracles, chs. 8, 13

All texts will be available on library reserve.  Students are required to use the editions indicated.  This is particularly important for translated texts. 

Please note that the use of laptops and other electronic devices during class is not permitted.
LEARNING OUTCOMES:

Acquire a basic understanding of contrasting philosophic arguments on matters of perennial human concern.

Gain experience in the art of reading carefully a philosophic text.

Improve one’s ability to write clearly, correctly and thoughtfully.

TEXTBOOK:
NONE
REQUIRED RESERVED READING:
Book TitleAuthorPublisherISBN numberLibrary Call NumberComments
RepublicPlato (tr. Allan Bloom)Basic Books0465069347 JC71 .P35 
TheaetetusPlato (tr. Joe Sachs)Focus1-58510-101-X  
Discourse on MethodDescartes (tr. Richard Kennington)Focus978-1-58510-259-4  
On the Nature of ThingsLucretius (tr. Walter Engler)Focus978-0941051217  
On the Soul and On Memory and RecollectionAristotle (tr. Joe Sachs)Green Lion Press978-1-888009-17-0  
How the Mind WorksSteven PinkerPenguin9780140244915QP360.5.P56 
The Blank SlateSteven PinkerViking0670031518 BF341.P47 
The Hungry SoulLeon KassUniversity of Chicago Press0-226-42568-1  
An Enquiry Concerning Human UnderstandingDavid HumeClarendon0198250606 B1480.2000 
MiraclesC.S. LewisCollins978-0-00-746125-7  

RECOMMENDED RESERVED READING:
NONE
GRADING POLICY
-ASSESSMENT METHODS:
AssignmentGuidelinesWeight
attendance, participation, short written comments, pop quizzes 20
3-4 short papers 60
final exam (essay questions on the readings) 20

-ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
A Work of this quality provides a coherent, orderly argument based on an a very careful reading of the relevant texts and a solid understanding of the relevant issues. The student displays superior reasoning skills, and has done a good deal of original thinking about the material. He or she knows how to raise important questions about the text and to evaluate possible answers to them. The student writes very clearly and has a near-perfect command of English usage and grammar. (Appropriate allowances are made for those for whom English is not a first language.)
B This is a good level of performance. The student displays a capacity for careful reading and good reasoning. The work reflects some original thinking and is not simply a repetition of lecture material and readings. The work does not suffer from any major errors or omissions. The student writes clearly and has a good command of English usage and grammar.
C This is an acceptable, or fair, level of performance. The student provides answers that are clear but limited, consisting mainly in a repetition of the text or lectures. The student has some ability to write clearly and correctly.
D This level of performances demonstrates that the student lacks a coherent grasp of the material. Important information is omitted and irrelevant points included. The paper is poorly organized, and the student shows limited ability to write clearly and correctly.
F This work fails to show any significant knowledge of the texts and the issues. Most of the material is irrelevant or inaccurate. There is no coherent argument and the student shows little ability to write clearly and correctly. This grade is also given for any act of plagiarism or other form of academic dishonesty.

-ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Students are expected to attend class regularly and on time.  Unexcused absences and lack of punctuality will negatively affect a student's grade.  If you will have to miss a class, let the professor know in advance.
ACADEMIC HONESTY
As stated in the university catalog, any student who commits an act of academic dishonesty will receive a failing grade on the work in which the dishonesty occurred. In addition, acts of academic dishonesty, irrespective of the weight of the assignment, may result in the student receiving a failing grade in the course. Instances of academic dishonesty will be reported to the Dean of Academic Affairs. A student who is reported twice for academic dishonesty is subject to summary dismissal from the University. In such a case, the Academic Council will then make a recommendation to the President, who will make the final decision.
STUDENTS WITH LEARNING OR OTHER DISABILITIES
John Cabot University does not discriminate on the basis of disability or handicap. Students with approved accommodations must inform their professors at the beginning of the term. Please see the website for the complete policy.

SCHEDULE

Weeks 1-3: Plato's Republic

Weeks 4-5: Knowledge

Week 6: Lucretius

Weeks 7-8: Aristotle, On the Soul

Weeks 9-10: Descartes, Pinker

Week 11: Kass

Week 12: Hume

Week 13: C.S. Lewis

Week 14: Conclusion and Review