JCU Logo

JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY

COURSE CODE: "PH 304H"
COURSE NAME: "Philosophy of Art and Beauty (This is an honors course and carries 4 semester hours of credit; NB: Minimum 3.5 CUM GPA required)"
SEMESTER & YEAR: Fall 2014
SYLLABUS

INSTRUCTOR: Brunella Antomarini
EMAIL: [email protected]
HOURS: MW 3:00 PM 4:15 PM
TOTAL NO. OF CONTACT HOURS: 45
CREDITS: 3
PREREQUISITES: Prerequisites: One previous philosophy course or Junior Standing Co-requisites: EN 110; Recommended Junior Standing
OFFICE HOURS:

COURSE DESCRIPTION:

 

The aim of this course is to give students a survey of the main philosophical problems issuing from theories of beauty and art, with a special emphasis on modern techniques. All artworks arise from a phase in which contingency, integration (or montage) of heterogeneous elements and experimentation, play a main role. Artists do not know how their initial intention will appear in the final product. They play with chances and errors and disturbances. The provisional and dynamic moment in art is intertwined with the technical, especially in modernity. The dysfunctional with the functional.

Key concepts to the structure of the lectures are: allegorical, art market, chance, construction, dysfunctional, editing, experiment, fragment, functional, gratuitous, mimesis, nature, representation, sequences, symbolic, technique. Aesthetics emerges as a controversial battleground of philosophical analysis. Class discussion and motivation are fundamental.

 

 

SUMMARY OF COURSE CONTENT:

Lectures and seminars will serve the purpose to analyze chosen topics (focused on visual art, with a look at theatre, poetry, music and dance). Power Point projections of classical and contemporary artworks are shown and discussed. A few guest lectures and films may be included in the program. 

EXCERPTS FROM TEXTS TO BE EXAMINED IN DEPTH (any good editions or online, or books on reserve in the library):

Form:

Plato, Phaedrus

H. Focillon, The Life of Forms

A. Portmann, "What Does the Living Form Mean to Us" in Essays in Philosophical Zoology

Ramachandran, The Science of Art

Perspective::

G. Alberti, On painting  

P. Florensky, Reverse Perspective

E. Panofsky, Perspective as Symbolic Form

Baroque and cinema:

G. Careri, Flights of Love

W.Benjamin, The Work of Art in the Age if its Mechanical Reproduction  

End of Art:

F.Hegel, Lectures on Aesthetics  

A.Danto, The Abuse of Beauty

Contingency:

Leonardo, Wonderful Inventions

M. Duchamp, The Creative Act

L. Henderson, Duchamp in Context

A. Breton, Surrealist Manifesto

N.Luhmann, Art as a Social System

P. Virilio, The Accident of Art.

Sublime:

I.Kant, Critique of Judgement

B. Newman, The Sublime is Now

J-F. Lyotard, The Inhuman

 

REFERENCE TEXT:

L. Shiner, The Invention of Art

 

 

EXCERPTS FROM FILMS:

Peter Greenaway, The Draughtsman's Contract

Luis Bunuel and Salvador Dalì, Un chien andalou

Germain Dulac and Antonin Artaud, La coquille et le clergyman

Salvador Dalì and Walt Disney, Destino

The painter in Teorema by P.P.Pasolini

Lars von Trier,  5 Obstructions                 

William Kentridge, Automatic Writing

LEARNING OUTCOMES:

Students will be able to understand modern art and to master art history from a theoretical perspective. Different theories of art explain different aspects of its practices, but are irreducible to one another. The study of the role contingency plays in the arts will constitute the core argument. The issues at stake will make students aware of the necessity to be critical and analytic in their evaluations of both philosophical arguments and art productions.

TEXTBOOK:
NONE
REQUIRED RESERVED READING:
NONE

RECOMMENDED RESERVED READING:
NONE
GRADING POLICY
-ASSESSMENT METHODS:
AssignmentGuidelinesWeight
 - Mid-term exam (25% of the final grade) - Final exam (40% of the final grade) - In-class presentation + paper, attendance and participation (35% of the final grade)  

-ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
AWork of this quality directly addresses the question or problem raised and provides a coherent argument displaying an extensive knowledge of relevant information or content. This type of work demonstrates the ability to critically evaluate concepts and theory and has an element of novelty and originality. There is clear evidence of a significant amount of reading beyond that required for the course.
BThis is highly competent level of performance and directly addresses the question or problem raised.There is a demonstration of some ability to critically evaluatetheory and concepts and relate them to practice. Discussions reflect the student’s own arguments and are not simply a repetition of standard lecture andreference material. The work does not suffer from any major errors or omissions and provides evidence of reading beyond the required assignments.
CThis is an acceptable level of performance and provides answers that are clear but limited, reflecting the information offered in the lectures and reference readings.
DThis level of performances demonstrates that the student lacks a coherent grasp of the material.Important information is omitted and irrelevant points included.In effect, the student has barely done enough to persuade the instructor that s/he should not fail.
FThis work fails to show any knowledge or understanding of the issues raised in the question. Most of the material in the answer is irrelevant.

-ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS:

Students should plan to regularly attend the class, since we will often broaden the topics contained in the texts to contemporary issues, and since this class is mainly intended to the rousing of students’ personal thoughts and ideas.

Please refer to the university catalog for the attendance and absence policy.

Academic honesty:

As stated in the university catalog, any student who commits an act of academic dishonesty will receive a failing grade on the work in which the dishonesty occurred. In addition, acts of academic dishonesty, irrespective of the weight of the assignment, may result in the student receiving a failing grade in the course.

 

It is forbidden to use the computer in class.

ACADEMIC HONESTY
As stated in the university catalog, any student who commits an act of academic dishonesty will receive a failing grade on the work in which the dishonesty occurred. In addition, acts of academic dishonesty, irrespective of the weight of the assignment, may result in the student receiving a failing grade in the course. Instances of academic dishonesty will be reported to the Dean of Academic Affairs. A student who is reported twice for academic dishonesty is subject to summary dismissal from the University. In such a case, the Academic Council will then make a recommendation to the President, who will make the final decision.
STUDENTS WITH LEARNING OR OTHER DISABILITIES
John Cabot University does not discriminate on the basis of disability or handicap. Students with approved accommodations must inform their professors at the beginning of the term. Please see the website for the complete policy.

SCHEDULE

Sept. 1

Introduction

3

From primitive to contemporary art

8

Plato on beauty and perception (aisthesis), Republic X, Phaedrus

10

Florensky and icon painting

15

Alberti and his modern critics: Panofsky

17

Kant on beauty

22

Kant on the sublime

24

Hegel and the end of art

29

Ramachandran: biological universality of beauty

Oct. 1

Kandinsky

6

Portmann: evolution and forms

8

Focillon on form

13

Duchamp, Wahrol and Newman (Henderson)

15

MID-TERM EXAMINATION

20

Films: Bunuel, Dalì; Dulac, Artaud.

22

Barnet Newman

27

Andy Warhol

29

Benjamin and the loss of aura

Nov 3

Danto's text

5

Danto and Hegel

10

Luhmann on art as a social need

12

Luhmann's text (The painter in Teorema by Pasolini)

17

Lars von Trier, 5 Obstructions

19

Comment on film

24

Virilio

26

Seminar

Dec 1

Seminar

3

Review

6-12

FINAL EXAMINATION