JCU Logo

JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY

COURSE CODE: "PL 223-2"
COURSE NAME: "Comparative Political Systems"
SEMESTER & YEAR: Spring 2014
SYLLABUS

INSTRUCTOR: Lawrence Gray
EMAIL: [email protected]
HOURS: MW 4:30 PM 5:45 PM
TOTAL NO. OF CONTACT HOURS: 45
CREDITS: 3
PREREQUISITES:
OFFICE HOURS:

COURSE DESCRIPTION:

This course is an introduction to the methods of comparing political systems.  Attention will be given to the basic approaches to the study of comparative politics and the differences among major types of political systems and ideologies.  Major components and processes of political systems will be analyzed as well as how and why these vary in different types of systems and change in the course of modernization.  In addition to examining the various approaches to comparative analysis the course will cover the political systems of Italy, Sweden, and Spain.

 

SUMMARY OF COURSE CONTENT:

Requirements:

 

  1. Mid-term examination
  2. A research paper of 10 pages due on the final day of class before Final Exam week begins.  The subject of the paper is:  “In What Ways Can Political Parties Still  be Seen as Essential to the Democratic Process?”  Sources for the paper will be the readings available in the library.
  3. Each student will write a 3 page film review.
  4. Each student will write a 3 page review essay of  an assigned book.
  5. Oral Report. Each student will participate in a two-member team presentation of a fifteen minute oral report.  The topic selection will be made during the third week of class.
  6. Final Exam
LEARNING OUTCOMES:

Methodology and Class Lecture Themes:

The methodology is to elaborate the important elements in the political system of a modern advanced society. Through class lectures, discussions and readings the causes and consequences of important aspects of political culture, interest groups, political parties and other structures will be analyzed.

Requirements:

  1. Mid-term examination
  2. A research paper of 10 pages due on the final day of class before Final Exam week begins.  The subject of the paper is:  “In What Ways Can Political Parties Still  be Seen as Essential to the Democratic Process?”  Sources for the paper will be the readings available in the library.
  3. Each student will write a 3 page review essay of  an assigned book.
  4. Oral Report. Each student will participate in a two-member team presentation of a fifteen minute oral report.  The topic selection will be made during the third week of class.
  5. Final Exam

 

Reserve Reading:

 

Tim Bale, European Politics

Howard Wiarda and Esther Kelley, Comparative Politics:  Approaches and Issues

 

Charles Hauss, Comparative Politics

M. Donald Hancock, Politics in Europe

Mark Kesselman and Joel Krieger, Introduction to Comparative Politics

Patrick O’Neil, et.al., Cases in Comparative Politics

David Samuels, Comparative Politics

 

Timothy Lim,  Doing Comparative Politics

Philip H. Pollock III, The Essentials of Political Analysis

Lawrence C. Mayer, Comparative Politics: The Quest for Theory and Explanation

Carol Ann Drogus and Stephen Orvis, Introducing Comparative Politics

Mary Hilson, The Nordic Model:  Scandinavia Since 1945

 

Michael Roskin, Countries and Concepts:  Politics, Geography, Culture

David Arter, Scandinavian Politics Today

 

Stephen Wayne, The Road to the White House 2012

George C. Edwards III, The Strategic President

Michael Keating, The Politics of Modern Europe

Michael Sodaro, Comparative Politics

John McCormack, Comparative Politics in Transition

Stephen Gundle and Simon Parker, The New Italian Republic

 

Martin Bull and James Newell, Italian Politics

Norman Thomas, The Politics of the Presidency

 

Additional Reading:

Lane and Ersson, Comparative Politics

Almond, Comparative Politics

Kopstein and Lichbach, Comparative Politics

Mahler, Comparative Politics

 

Landman, Issues in Comparative Politics

 

Andrian, Comparative Political Systems

 

Bartolini, Party Politics in Contemporary Western Europe

 

Heclo and Madsen, Policy and Politics in Sweden

 

Bull and Rhodes, Crisis and Transition in Italian Politics

 

Coverdale, Political Transformation of Spain After Franco

 

Stephan, Arguing Comparative Politics



Judt, Postwar:  A History of Europe Since 1945 

 

Chechel and Katzenstein, European Identity 

 

Hitchcock,  The Struggle for Europe

Wiarda, New Directions in Comparative Politics

 

George C. Edwards III,   The Strategic President

 

Fareed Zakaria, From Wealth to Power

 

Mark A. Smith,  The Right Talk

 

Peters, Comparative Politics

 

Meny and Knopp, Governments and Politics of Western Europe

 

Graham, The Politics of Governing

Landman, Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics

Broughton and Donovan, Changing Party Systems in Western Europe

 

Wiarda and Mott, Catholic Roots and Democratic Flowers

Sani, et. al., Spain After Franco

TEXTBOOK:
Book TitleAuthorPublisherISBN numberLibrary Call NumberCommentsFormatLocal BookstoreOnline Purchase
please refer to the schedule...     
REQUIRED RESERVED READING:
Book TitleAuthorPublisherISBN numberLibrary Call NumberComments
please refer to the schedule...  

RECOMMENDED RESERVED READING:
Book TitleAuthorPublisherISBN numberLibrary Call NumberComments
please refer to the schedule...  
GRADING POLICY
-ASSESSMENT METHODS:
AssignmentGuidelinesWeight
Midterm  20%
Research Paper 25%
Review Essay 10%
Final Exam 25%
Oral report  10%
Class Participation  10%

-ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
AWork of this quality directly addresses the question or problem raised and provides a coherent argument displaying an extensive knowledge of relevant information or content. This type of work demonstrates the ability to critically evaluate concepts and theory and has an element of novelty and originality. There is clear evidence of a significant amount of reading beyond that required for the course
BThis is highly competent level of performance and directly addresses the question or problem raised.There is a demonstration of some ability to critically evaluatetheory and concepts and relate them to practice. Discussions reflect the student’s own arguments and are not simply a repetition of standard lecture andreference material. The work does not suffer from any major errors or omissions and provides evidence of reading beyond the required assignments.
CThis is an acceptable level of performance and provides answers that are clear but limited, reflecting the information offered in the lectures and reference readings.
DThis level of performances demonstrates that the student lacks a coherent grasp of the material.Important information is omitted and irrelevant points included.In effect, the student has barely done enough to persuade the instructor that s/he should not fail.
FThis work fails to show any knowledge or understanding of the issues raised in the question. Most of the material in the answer is irrelevant.

-ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Attendance is required.
ACADEMIC HONESTY
As stated in the university catalog, any student who commits an act of academic dishonesty will receive a failing grade on the work in which the dishonesty occurred. In addition, acts of academic dishonesty, irrespective of the weight of the assignment, may result in the student receiving a failing grade in the course. Instances of academic dishonesty will be reported to the Dean of Academic Affairs. A student who is reported twice for academic dishonesty is subject to summary dismissal from the University. In such a case, the Academic Council will then make a recommendation to the President, who will make the final decision.
STUDENTS WITH LEARNING OR OTHER DISABILITIES
John Cabot University does not discriminate on the basis of disability or handicap. Students with approved accommodations must inform their professors at the beginning of the term. Please see the website for the complete policy.

SCHEDULE

Lessons 1 and 2:  Introduction.  What is politics?  The relationship between a political order and a social system.  (REQUIRED READING:  Chapter 1:  “Issues in Comparative Politics” pp. 1 – 37 in Gabriel Almond, et. al., Comparative Politics;  Chapters 1 and 2:  “What is Comparative Politics?” and “The Framework of Analyis”, pp. 1 – 39 in Jeffrey Kopstein and Mark Lichbach, Comparative Politics; Chapter 1: “Comparative Politics:  What Is It? Why Study It?”, pp. 3 – 27 in Michael Sodaro, Comparative  Politics. A Global Introduction;  Part I:  “Introduction: The Field of Comparative Politics”, pp. 3 – 41 in Howard Wiarda, ed.., New Directions in Comparative Politics;  “Introduction”, pp. 1 – 23 in John McCormack, Comparative Politics in Transition; )

Lessons 3 and 4:  Why do we compare?  How do we compare? (REQUIRED READING: Chapter 2:  “Comparing Political Systems” pp. 39 – 54 in Almond, Comparative Politics;  Part I: “Why, How and Problems of Comparison”, pp. 1 – 95 in Todd Landman, Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics;   Chapter 1: “The Concept of Country”, pp. 1 – 16 in Michael Roskin, Countries and Concepts;  Chapter 1: “Comparative Approaches”, pp. 11 – 28 in Jan Erik Lane and Svante Ersson, Comparative Politics;  Chapter 1:  “Comparative Political Analysis:  An Introduction” pp. 1 – 21 in Gregory Mahler, Comparative Politics.)

 

Lessons 5 and 6:  Political culture. Agents of Political Socialization. (REQUIRED READING:  “Political Culture and Political Socialization” pp. 56 – 75 in Almond, Comparative Politics; Chapter 1: “Politics and Society:  Cleavages”, pp. 16 – 46 in Yves Meny and Andrew Knopp, Governments and Politics of Western Europe; )

Lesson 7:  Interest Groups.  Policy Perspectives on Interest Articulation. (REQUIRED READING:  “Interest Articulation” pp. 78 – 99 in Almond, Comparative Politics;  Chapter 11: “”People and Poltiics:  Voters, Parties, Interest Groups, Dissidence, Revolution”, pp. 243 – 269 in Sodaro, Comparative Politics. A Global Perspective; Chapter 3:  “Interest Groups” pp. 100 – 129 in Yves Meny, Government and Politics in Western Europe;  Chapter 3:  “Interest Groups” pp. 123 – 153 in Meny and Knapp, Governments and Politics of Western Europe; )

 

Lessons 8 and  9:   Political Parties.  Comparative Party Systems and Interest Aggregation. (REQUIRED READING:  “Interest Aggregation and Political Parties” pp. 102 – 124 in Almond, Comparative Politics;  Chapter 4:  “The Dynamics of European Political Systems” pp. 99 – 147 in Lawrence S. Graham, The Politics of Governing;  Chapter 2:  “Political Parties”, pp. 38 – 100 in Meny, Government and Politics in Western Europe; Chapter 2: “Political Parties” pp. 46 – 123 in Meny and Knopp, Governments and Politics of Western Europe;  Chapter 7:  “Interest Groups and Political Parties” pp. 144 – 163 in Mahler, Comparative Politics.)

 

Lesson 10:  Mid-Term Exam

Lessons 11, 12, and 13:  Italy:  Political Parties in Historical Perspective,  the Roles of Government and Parliament, Political Culture. (REQUIRED READING:  “Italy” pp. 225 – 301 in Michael Keating, The Politics of Modern Europe;   Chapter 6:  “The Case Study” pp. 137 -  156 in Guy Peters, Comparative Politics;  Part 4:  “Italy”, pp. 279 – 393 in  M. Donald Hancock, Politics in Europe; Chapter 1: “History” pp. 9 – 47, Chapter 5: “Political Culture and Behavior” pp. 145 – 179, Chapter 7: “Elections, Voting and Political Parties” pp. 210 – 251; Chapter 1: “Understanding Political Change in Post-War Italy” pp. 4 – 20, Chapter 3: “Political Parties and the Party System” p. 39 – 63 in  Martin Bull and James Newell, Italian Politics;   Chapter 3: “Political Catholicism and the Strange Death of the Christian Democrats” pp. 59 – 72 in Stephen Gundle and Simon Parker, The New Italian Republic;  Part IV:  “Italy” pp. 253 – 347 in Donald Hancock, Politics in Europe)

Lessons 14 and 15: Sweden:  Political Parties in Historical Perspective, the Roles of Government and Parliament, Political Culture. (REQUIRED READING:  “Sweden” pp. 144 – 162 in David Broughton and Mark Donovan, eds.,  Changing Party Systems in Western Europe;  Part V:  “Sweden” pp. 347 – 403 in Hancock, Politics in Europe )

Lesson 16:  Spain:  Political Parties in Historical Perspective, the Roles of Government and Parliament, Political Culture. (REQUIRED READING:  “Spain” pp. 367 – 427 in Keating, The Politics of Modern Europe;  Chapter 2:  “Past as Prologue” pp. 13 – 34 in R. Gunther, G. Sani, and G. Shabad, Spain After Franco; Chapter 4:  “The Transition to Democracy” pp. 61 – 81, Chapter 5: “Political Culture:  The Iberian Melody pp. 81 – 105, Chapter 7:  “Political Parties and Elections” pp. 125 – 145 in Howard Wiarda and Margaret Mott, Catholic Roots and Democratic Flowers .)

Lessons 17 and 18 : United States:  Political Parties in Historical Perspective, the Roles of Government and Congress, Political Culture.  (REQUIRED READING: “The United States” pp. 45 – 65 in Charles Hauss, Comparative Politics;  Chapter 7: “United States:  Governance, Policy Making, Representation and Participation” pp. 335 – 354 in Mark Kesselman and Joel Krieger, Introduction to Comparative Politics;  Part 1: “The Electoral Arena” pp. 2 – 108 in Stephen J. Wayne, The Road to the White House;  Chapter 1: “The Changing Presidency” pp. 3 – 43 in Norman Thomas, The Politics of the Presidency.)

 

Lessons 19 and 20: Student Oral Reports

 

Lesson 21:  Final Exam


Core Texts:

The core reading for the course will be the following texts:  America and the Intellectual Cold Wars in Europe by Volker Berghahn,  The Lost Peace:  Leadership in a Time of Horror and Hope 1945 – 1953 by Robert Dallek,  and Billionaires Ball: Gluttony and Hubris in an Age of Epic Inequality by Linda McQuaig and Neil Brooks. These books may be purchased in Rome or ordered through Amazon.

 

Films:

“Capitalism Hits the Fan”,  “Heist! Who Stole the American Dream”,  “The War on Democracy”,  “Ethos: A Time for Change”,  “A Better Life”,  “Remembrance of Things to Come”, “Conspiracy”, “Casino Jack and the United States of Money”,  “So Goes the Nation”, and “A Perfect Candidate”.

 

Oral Report Topics:

 

  1. Can any useful distinctions still be made between the ideology of Christian democrats, social democrats, and conservatives?

 

  1. Has change in European party systems over recent years resulted more from changes in society, or from the behavior of political actors?

 

  1.  What evidence does Western Europe offer of a “decline of parliaments” since 1945?

  1.  Why has the impact of religion on political behavior been so variable between different countries?

 

  1.   Has social class declined as a determinant of voting in the major West European countries?

 

  1.   Should the function of Head of State in West European democracies be considered a largely ceremonial one?

 

  1.   How, and under what conditions, can prime ministers exercise leadership in West European governments?

 

  1.   “The legislature is the most important constraint on the activity of the executive branch in Western Europe”. 

 

  1.    Can the rise of the far Right and Green parties in many European countries since the 1980s be explained by any common causes?

 

  1.   Why has governmental office posed particular dilemmas for Communist and Socialist parties, and how have they generally reacted to these difficulties?

 

  1.    Does regionalism pose a major challenge to national identity in Western Europe?

 

  1.    Do modern European governments suffer from a problem of legitimacy?

 

  1.    Does the modern European welfare state intervene too much and cost too much?

 

  1.     Was political behavior in late 20th century Western Europe more or less territorially fragmented than in the immediate post-war period?

 

  1.     Is a “social explosion” in the streets possible if citizen participation in Western           European societies is not enhanced?  

Primary Reserve Reading:

 

Mark Kesselman and Joel Krieger, Introduction to Comparative Politics;  M. Donald Hancock, Politics in Europe, 4th edition;  G. Bingham Powell, et.al., Comparative Politics:  A Theoretical Framework;   Timothy Lim, Doing Comparative Politics;  Carol Ann Drogus and Stephen Orvis, Introducing Comparative Politics;   Michael Roskin, Countries and Concepts:  Politics, Geography, Culture;  Michael Keating, The Politics of Modern Europe; Michael Sodaro, Comparative Politics;  John McCormack, Comparative Politics in Transition;  Gabriel Amond, Comparative Politics;  William Hitchcock, The Struggle for Europe;  Tim Bale, European Politics; Silvio Bartolini, Party Politics in Contemporary Western Europe;  David Arter, Scandinavian Politics Today; Stephen Wayne, The Road to the White House 2012;  Martin Bull and James Newell, Italian Politics;  Norman Thomas, The Politics of the Presidency;  Howard Wiarda and Esther Kelley, Comparative Politics; Charles Hauss, Comparative Politics;  Richard Lingeman, The Noir Forties;  Peter Eisner, The Pope’s Lost Crusade; Elena Kostioukovitch, Why Italians Love to Talk About Food; Richard Pollock III, The Essentials of Political Analysis.

Additional Reading:

Peter Eisner, The Pope’s Last Crusade; Elena Kostioukovitch, Why Italians Love to Talk About Food; Patrick O’Neil, et.al., Cases in Comparative Politics;  Elena Kostioukovitch, Why Italians Love to Talk About Food;  David Samuels, Comparative Politics;  Lawrence C. Mayer, Comparative Politics:  The Quest for Theory and Explanations; Mary Hilson, The Nordic Model:  Scandinavia Since 1945;  George C. Edwards III, The Strategic President; Stephen Gundle and Simon Parker, The New Italian Republic;  Martin Bull and Martin Rhodes, Crisis and Transition in Italian Politics;  Tony Judt, Postwar:  A History of Europe since 1945;  George C. Edwards III, The Strategic President;  Fareed Zakaria, From Wealth to Power;  Ira Katzenstein and Chechel, European Identity;  Howard Wiarda, New Directions in Comparative Politics;  Yves Meny, Governments and Politics of Western Europe;  Howard Wiarda, Catholic Roots and Democratic Flowers;  A. Smith, The Right Talk;  Eric Lane and Svante Ersson, Comparative Politics;  F. Mahler, Comparative Politics;  Heclo and Madsen, Policy and Politics in Sweden;  S. Landman, Issues in Comparative Politics;  B. Andrian, Comprative Political Systems;  G. Peters,  Comparative Politics;  and  Broughton and Donovan, Changing Party Systems in Western Europe.