|
|
JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY
COURSE CODE: "CW 356"
COURSE NAME: "Creative Writing Workshop: Writing the Eternal City"
SEMESTER & YEAR:
Fall Semester 2012
|
SYLLABUS
INSTRUCTOR:
Geoghegan Elizabeth
EMAIL: [email protected]
HOURS:
MW 15:00-16:15
TOTAL NO. OF CONTACT HOURS:
45
CREDITS:
3
PREREQUISITES:
Prerequisite: EN 103 or 105 with grade of C or above
OFFICE HOURS:
TBD; by appointment
|
|
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
This interdisciplinary writing workshop employs the city of Rome as its muse and offers instruction in several genres of creative writing. By examining a variety of works inspired by the Eternal City, students will learn how to evaluate literature in light of an aesthetic and historic precedent, as well as participate in the long tradition of international writers who have recreated Rome on the page. The course will also problematize Rome, exploring the ancient city’s contemporary contradictions and complexities and the way writers both perpetuate and dismantle certain myths, such as the illusory La Dolce Vita. Writing workshops will acquaint students with the techniques and tools used to critique and incorporate critical feedback into their own revision process. Through studied writing practice and the examination of the Roman setting as a vital literary component, students will generate a final portfolio of textual interpretations in response to the Eternal City.
|
SUMMARY OF COURSE CONTENT:
Students will engage in studied writing practice and keep a journal in which they will document the city of Rome, so they may later shape entries into more substantive, polished work, regardless of genre. The course will move between writing workshops, traditional lectures, discussions of the assigned readings, student presentations of journal assignments, and in-class writing. Occasionally, the meetings will incorporate a field trip or site visit; some assignments will require outings within the city of Rome to be made during the student’s own time. Readings will correspond to the specific genres and the assignments connected to them. The final portfolio will include a combination of the following forms: poetry, fiction, and creative nonfiction such as diary, memoir, personal essays, and travel writing. Born of the philosophy that all writing benefits from careful critique and thoughtful revision, the workshops will aid students in the development of critical thinking and editorial skills, helping to foster an aesthetic sensibility about their own writing, the writing of others, and ultimately a more thorough understanding of several genres encompassed by the term “creative writing.”
|
LEARNING OUTCOMES:
Students completing this workshop will have spent an entire semester exploring the rich literary tradition inspired by the city of Rome and they will have featured Rome in their own writing, whether fiction, nonfiction, or poetry. They will be familiar with the writing techniques employed when producing works within various genres of creative writing and they will have gained experience through generating a portfolio of their own work. Lastly, they will have acquired the editorial skills necessary to offer critique and to self-edit, and taken their own work through various stages of revision.
|
TEXTBOOK:
Book Title | Author | Publisher | ISBN number | Library Call Number | Comments | Format | Local Bookstore | Online Purchase |
The Smiles of Rome | Cahill, Susan (editor) | Ballantine Books | 03454320X | | | | | |
The Roman Spring of Mrs. Stone | Tennessee Williams | New Directions | 0811212491 | | | | | |
|
REQUIRED RESERVED READING:
Book Title | Author | Publisher | ISBN number | Library Call Number | Comments |
Selected Readings | Various | | none | | |
RECOMMENDED RESERVED READING:
|
GRADING POLICY
-ASSESSMENT METHODS:
Assignment | Guidelines | Weight |
Specific Assignments TBD | Assigments will take the form of written responses to readings & assigned outings and other homework to be done in the journal (or sketchbook). Writing assignments will include a combination of microfiction, short stories, creative nonfiction sketches, longer reflective essays or memoir-styled pieces, and two or more poems. All of the major prose and poetry assignments will be revised and included in the final portfolio along with a process analysis of each piece. Sketchbooks will be presented and graded. Students will also be assessed on preparedness and participation. The following is a summary of the assessment method: 15% homework & journal, 15% conscientiousness of self-editing, 15% criticism/editing of peers' work, 40% final portfolio. | |
-ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
Grade Scale
A 100-94 B 86-83 C 74-70
A- 93-90 B- 82-80 D 69-60
B+ 89-87 C+ 79-75 F 59-0
John Cabot University Marking Criteria
Grade: A
Work of this quality is rare and should stand out. It may be the case that in some areas of study a modest number of students achieve this mark on some assignments. However, when aggregating the marks awarded for the various elements of assessment, it is not expected that many students will achieve this overall result. Work that receives a grade of A is characterized by the following:
- Directly addresses the question or problem raised
- Provides a coherent argument displaying an extensive knowledge of relevant information
- Critically evaluates concepts and theory
- Relates theory to practice
- Reflects the student's own argument and is not simply a repetition of standard lecture and reference material
- Is very accurate; has an element of novelty if not originality
- Provides evidence of reading beyond the required reading
- Displays an awareness of methodological concerns and displays an awareness of the limitations of current knowledge
Grade: B
This is a highly competent level of performance. Students earning this grade may be deemed capable of pursuing more advanced study. Work that receives a grade of B is characterized by the following:
- Directly addresses the question or problem raised
- Provides a coherent argument drawing on relevant information
- Shows some ability to evaluate concepts and theory and to relate theory to practice
- Reflects the student's own argument and is not simply a repetition of standard lecture and reference material
- Does not suffer from any major errors or omissions
- Provides evidence of reading beyond the required reading
- Displays an awareness of other approaches to the problem area
Grade: C
This is an acceptable level of performance. All competent students should be expected to achieve at least this level. Work that receives a grade of C is characterized by the following:
- Addresses the question but provides only a basic outline of relevant arguments and evidence along the lines of that offered in the lectures and referenced readings
- Answers are clear but limited
- Some minor omissions and inaccuracies but no major errors
Grade: C-
This level of performance demonstrates some knowledge and an element of understanding but is, on the whole, weak. Students attaining this level of performance should compose a small minority of those in a course and should not ecpect to progress to more advanced degree work. Work that receives a grade of C- is characterized by the following:
- Points made in the answer are not always well supported by argument and evidence
- Relevant points have been omitted from the answer
- There are some errors in the answer
- Parts of the question remain unanswered
- Answers may be unduly brief and possibly in note form
Grade: D
These grades indicate that the students in question have barely done enough to persuade the instructor that they should not be failed. Work that receives a grade of D is characterized by the following:
- Answers lack a coherent grasp of the problems and issues raised in the question
- Important information has been omitted from the answers and irrelevant points have been included
- Answers are far too brief
Grade: F
Failing grades should be granted to work that indicates to the instructor that the students who submitted it have not benefitted in any clear way from academic study. Failing work:
- Fails to show any knowledge or understanding of the issues raised in the question
- Reveals fundamental misunderstanding of the subject matter
- Most of the material in the answer is irrelevant
Timely Submission of Work
Late work will not be accepted for any reason. Assigments submitted after the due date/class meeting automatically earn a grade of 0.
-ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Attendance Requirements: students are required to attend all scheduled class meetings and to participate in all classroom activities. In addition to this weighting of attendance, students are allowed only two absences (no questions asked, no excuses needed). However, each additional absence beyond the two allowed will result in the significant reduction in the final grade for the course. Students with more than five absences will fail the course. Student arriving at class after the class attendance has been taken will be counted as absent. Please refer to the university catalog for the attendance and absence policy.
|
|
ACADEMIC HONESTY
As stated in the university catalog, any student who commits an act of academic
dishonesty will receive a failing grade on the work in which the dishonesty occurred.
In addition, acts of academic dishonesty, irrespective of the weight of the assignment,
may result in the student receiving a failing grade in the course. Instances of
academic dishonesty will be reported to the Dean of Academic Affairs. A student
who is reported twice for academic dishonesty is subject to summary dismissal from
the University. In such a case, the Academic Council will then make a recommendation
to the President, who will make the final decision.
|
STUDENTS WITH LEARNING OR OTHER DISABILITIES
John Cabot University does not discriminate on the basis of disability or handicap.
Students with approved accommodations must inform their professors at the beginning
of the term. Please see the website for the complete policy.
|
|
SCHEDULE
|
|
Date & Course Topic
|
Readings & Assignments
|
Week One – Three
Course Intro
The Roman Landscape in Fiction
Voice & Point of View
Workshop
|
Course Intro: Fiction
Writing Microfiction
Read: Wharton & Updike
Topic: Working with POV
Microfiction #1 Due
Read Wolff & Hazzard
Be prepared to offer written & oral critique in workshop
Outing/Sketchbook Assignment: TBA
Topic: Characterization & Voice
Read: Garcia Marquez & Yourcenar (Excerpt)
Begin Roman Story
Outing/Sketchbook Assignment: TBA
|
Weeks Four – Seven
|
Short Stories Due
Read: Cheever & Handouts on POV
Outing/Sketchbook Assignment TBA
Read: Spencer & Williams
Be prepared to offer written & oral critique in workshop
Outing/Sketchbook Assignment: TBA
Microfiction 2/Postcards Due; Presentations
|
Week Eight – Ten
Creative Nonfiction
|
Read: Spark & Aciman
Read: Fountains, and Roman Hours (Text)
Short Nonfiction Pieces Due
Worksop
Read: Aciman & Bowen (Handouts), excerpt from A Time in Rome (Text)
Outing/Sketchbook Assignment TBA
|
Weeks Eleven -- Twelve
Reflective Essay Workshop &
Introduction to Poetry
|
Reflective Roman Essays Due
Workshop; be prepared to offer written and oral critique in workshop
Introduction to Poetry
Read: Poetry (Wilbur, Cole, Egan, et al) TBD)
Read: Poetry (McHugh, Miloscz, et al)
|
Week Thirteen
Final Exam Period: Portfolios Due
|
Two Roman Poems Due
Outing/Weekly Journal Assignment TBA
Be prepared to offer written and oral critique in workshop
Presentation of Sketchbooks
Portfolio Workshop/Triage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|