JCU Logo

JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY

COURSE CODE: "EN 110-6"
COURSE NAME: "English Composition III"
SEMESTER & YEAR: Spring Semester 2012
SYLLABUS

INSTRUCTOR: Klausner Lewis Samuel
HOURS: TTH 14:30-15:45
TOTAL NO. OF CONTACT HOURS: 45
CREDITS: 3
PREREQUISITES: Prerequisite: Placement via JCU English Composition Placement Exam or completion of either EN 103 or EN 105 with a grade of C or above
OFFICE HOURS: By appointment

COURSE DESCRIPTION:
This course is designed to enable you to do two things: participate constructively in written conversation in a public format such as an op-ed page, and to develop the research and writing skills that would eventually enable you to participate in more complex written conversation such as in scholarly journals. 
SUMMARY OF COURSE CONTENT:
We will study the format of the short essay, especially the opinion piece, in terms of organization and rhetorical strategy. Using Graff and Birkenstein's They Say, I Say we will look at how one makes the intellectual moves that enable one to respond effectively to a written argument or study. We will use opinion pieces, mostly from the New York Times, to practice our skills at responding to texts. Students will respond in greater depth to at least one of the topics we respond to, by doing their own research and citing other texts that bear on the subject. 
LEARNING OUTCOMES:
Students will be ready to write effective responses to written arguments and to write effective research papers in any academic field. 
TEXTBOOK:
Book TitleAuthorPublisherISBN numberLibrary Call NumberCommentsFormatLocal BookstoreOnline Purchase
They Say I Say Gerald Graff and Cathy BirkensteinNorton 978 0 393 93363 1     
REQUIRED RESERVED READING:
NONE

RECOMMENDED RESERVED READING:
NONE
GRADING POLICY
-ASSESSMENT METHODS:
AssignmentGuidelinesWeight
Response to op-ed pieceOne and a half to two pages, based on They Say/I Say and class discussion.15
Second response to an article. Two and a half to three pages, based on They Say/I Say and class discussion.15
In-class writing Identification and analysis based on articles we read.15
Argument EssayArgument based on thesis and draft submitted earlier.20
Research PaperEssay using outside sources, thesis and draft submitted earlier.20
Final Exam Analysis and prepared response to articles we read.15

-ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:

Assessment Guidelines for assigning main letter grades: A, B, C,D, and F.

A:  Work of this quality directly addresses the question or problem raised and provides a coherent argument displaying an extensiveknowledge of relevant information or content. This type of work demonstrates the ability to critically evaluate concepts and theory and has an element of novelty and originality. There is clear evidence of a significant amount of reading beyond that required for the course.

B:  This is highly competent level of performance and directly addresses the question or problem raised.

There is a demonstration of some ability to critically evaluatetheory and concepts and relate them to practice. Discussions reflect the student’s own arguments and are not simply a repetition of standard lecture andreference material. The work does not suffer from any major errors or omissions and provides evidence of reading beyond the required assignments.

C:  This is an acceptable level of performance and provides answers that are clear but limited, reflecting the information offered in the lectures and reference readings.

D:  This level of performances demonstrates that the student lacks a coherent grasp of the material.

Important information is omitted and irrelevant points included.In effect, the student has barely done enough to persuade the instructor that s/he should not fail.

F: This work fails to show any knowledge or understanding of the issues raised in the question. Most of the material in the answer is irrelevant.


-ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Three absences, excused or unexcused, will not in itself affect grades. Four or more will. One cannot pass the course with more than five absences excused or unexcused. 
ACADEMIC HONESTY
As stated in the university catalog, any student who commits an act of academic dishonesty will receive a failing grade on the work in which the dishonesty occurred. In addition, acts of academic dishonesty, irrespective of the weight of the assignment, may result in the student receiving a failing grade in the course. Instances of academic dishonesty will be reported to the Dean of Academic Affairs. A student who is reported twice for academic dishonesty is subject to summary dismissal from the University. In such a case, the Academic Council will then make a recommendation to the President, who will make the final decision.
STUDENTS WITH LEARNING OR OTHER DISABILITIES
John Cabot University does not discriminate on the basis of disability or handicap. Students with approved accommodations must inform their professors at the beginning of the term. Please see the website for the complete policy.

SCHEDULE


Session

Session Focus

Reading Assignment

Other Assignment

Meeting Place/Exam Dates

Tuesday January 17

Introduction to the course and requirements; goals and expectations; sample writing

Reading images and writing descriptions (photos and political cartoons).

In-class writing sample (collected but not returned or graded)

Thursday January 19

Entering the Conversation

They Say/I Say 1-15; 195-197 (“Don’t Blame the Eater)

 

Do either exercise 1 or 2 on pages 14-15.  .

Tuesday January 24

The Art of Summary

TS/IS 19-41;

 Summary of Don’t Blame the Eater

Thursday January 26

The Art of Quoting

TS/IS 42-51; Handout: “Falser Words Were Never Spoken”

 Summary of “Falser Words”

Tuesday January 31

Three Ways to Respond: Yes/No/Ok, but…

TS/IS 55-67; Handout: “Saudis in Bikinis”

Summary of Saudis in Bikinis

 

Thursday February 2

Connecting the Parts

 TS/IS 105-120

Response to Saudis in Bikinis

Tuesday February 7

In-class Essay 1: Graded

Response to Saudis in Bikinis

TS/IS 68-77

Thursday February 9

Planting a Naysayer in Your Text

 TS/IS 78-91 ; Handout: “Amnesty: Let Us Be Vigilant and Charitable”

Tuesday February 14

Saying Why It Matters

TS/IS 92-101.  Handout: Why Blame Mexico?

Response to Kavanaugh and Reed

Thursday February 16

Connecting The Parts

TS/IS 105-120; Handout: Should The United States Grant Legal Status to Undocumented Immigrant Workers?

Tuesday February 21

In-Class Essay 2: Graded

Response to Kavanaugh and Reed

IS/TS 121-138

 

Thursday February 23

Mixing High and Low Diction

Handout: Pope on a Rope Tow

Tuesday February 28

Definitional Arguments Feedback on in-class essay 2;

Handout: pages 210-236

 

Thursday March 1

Causal Arguments

Handout pages 237-263

Tuesday March 6

Entering a Debate: Park 51

Handout: Muslims in the Middle

Short definition Essay (2 to 3 pages)

Thursday March 8

Furthering the debate

Handout: Newt Direct; Sam Harris

Tuesday March 13

Preparing to write a research paper

Handout

Response to Dalrymple, Gingrich, and Harris

Thursday March 15

In class essay 3: Park 51

Moscow’s Stray Dogs

Tuesday March 27

Writing in the Sciences

Review of thesis statements

TS/IS 156-174

Moscow’s Stray Dogs

Thesis Statement

Thursday March 29

Writing in the Social Sciences

TS/IS 175-192

Tuesday
April 3

In-Class Essay: Moscow’s Stray Dogs

Writing Arguments pages 237-265 also page 274

 Research paper outline and preliminary list of resources (minimum 6) due; bring your MLA Handbook

Thursday April 5

In-class essay 4

Tuesday
April 10

Resemblance arguments; preparation for in-class 6

Writing Arguments pages 264-283

First draft of research paper due (including works cited page)

Thursday April 12

Your So-Called Education

Tuesday
April 17

Evaluation and ethical arguments; last minute questions/difficulties with research paper/ revision in class; student errors of citation format and corrections together

What Should Colleges Teach?

Summary/Response to Your So-Called Education

Thursday April 19

Research paper

Handout

 Summary/Response to What Should Colleges Teach?

Tuesday
April 24

Classical Argument

Handout

Research paper due

Thursday April 26

Course evaluation; another argument classic; general revision for final exam

Handout

 

(April 28 -May 4)

Day & time to be established

FINAL EXAM

SessionSession FocusReading AssignmentOther AssignmentMeeting Place/Exam Dates