JCU Logo

JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY

COURSE CODE: "BUS 301-1"
COURSE NAME: "Business Ethics"
SEMESTER & YEAR: Spring Semester 2012
SYLLABUS

INSTRUCTOR: Bailey Tom
EMAIL: [email protected]
HOURS: TTH 14:30-15:45
TOTAL NO. OF CONTACT HOURS: 45
CREDITS: 3
PREREQUISITES: Prerequisite: Junior Standing
OFFICE HOURS: By appointment

COURSE DESCRIPTION:

This course considers some of the most important ethical issues in business today. Students will examine such issues as businesses’ responsibilities to investors, workers and consumers, the pros and cons of ‘free markets’, the challenges raised by globalization and environmental damage, ideas of ‘ethical’ investment and consumption and the special dilemmas faced by multinational businesses. Issues will be studied through a selection of contemporary cases, issues, arguments and approaches, along with much class discussion, with the aim of helping students to develop a familiarity with the debates and their ability to discuss, reflect on and defend their own ethical views. Rather than taking an exclusively ‘strategic’ (the instrumental management of ethical issues by business), ‘theoretical’ (the study of abstract ethical theory, then ‘applied’ to cases) or ‘preaching’ (the moral improvement of students) approach, then, the course combines elements of these approaches within the broader activity of developing students’ own ethical views.  

SUMMARY OF COURSE CONTENT:
 

The first part of the course involves the study of four introductory cases, intended to start students thinking about some key questions in business ethics. The second part of the course is then dedicated to three fundamental debates – respectively, about free markets, social responsibilities and government responsibilities. For each debate, students will study relevant ideas and arguments and a specific case. The final part of the course explores the ethics of business’ relations to specific stakeholder groups, through relevant theories and the study of more complex issues concerning these groups.

See also 'Schedule' below.
LEARNING OUTCOMES:

By the end of the course students will be able to:

• recognize and analyze ethical issues raised by contemporary business in its relations with investors, workers, consumers, the wider society, government and the environment;

• analyze relevant recent cases, along with specific positions and arguments regarding them;

• analyze and employ broader theoretical approaches, debates and concepts in contemporary business ethics;

• develop informed, reasoned positions regarding these issues, cases and broader aspects;

• present, discuss and analyze course material orally and in written forms and in individual and group contexts;                               

• make appropriate use of original and academic resources and undertake guided research work.

TEXTBOOK:
NONE
REQUIRED RESERVED READING:
NONE

RECOMMENDED RESERVED READING:
NONE
GRADING POLICY
-ASSESSMENT METHODS:
AssignmentGuidelinesWeight
 <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><i>Class participation: 20%</i></p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"> </p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;">Classes will involve a mixture of lectures, seminar discussions, group presentations and other activities. The emphasis will be on helping students to develop their own opinions and arguments and their ability to discuss them with others, as well as their understanding of the materials, issues, and relevant ethical concepts. Students&rsquo; active involvement in discussions and other class activities, based on adequate preparation outside class, is therefore essential to the course. </p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"> </p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;">Students will be given a percentage grade for each class on the basis of the preparation, thinking and engagement that their contributions show, and the average of these grades will constitute their final participation grade. A maximum of two unexcused absences from class will be accepted. Beyond this, a zero grade will be given for each unexcused absence. </p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"> </p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;">It is a student&rsquo;s responsibility to inform the professor if he or she misses or cannot participate fully in a class for a good reason. Good reasons include illness, unavoidable appointments, and transport strikes, but not trips, guests, and malfunctioning alarm clocks. </p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"> </p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><span>Note that the use of a laptop or mobile phone in class also counts as an &lsquo;unexcused absence&rsquo;.</span></p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><b> </b></p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;">In addition to the scheduled classes, there may be opportunities to attend lectures or other events of relevance to the course, and in some cases this will be considered obligatory.</p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><b> </b></p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><i>Online forum contributions: 10%</i></p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><b> </b></p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;">Since the online forum is intended to allow for free discussion, the content of students&rsquo; posts will not be assessed. Students will gain the full (100%) grade for this assessment simply by posting on time for the classes on the three main parts of the course. It is a student&rsquo;s responsibility to inform the professor if he or she misses a post for a good reason, and if more than two posts are missed without good reason, a zero grade will be given for this assessment. </p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><i> </i></p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><i>Mid-term and final written assignments: 20% each</i></p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"> </p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;">The mid-term written assignment will be a &lsquo;take-home&rsquo; assignment of 1200-1300 words. The questions from which students will choose will be distributed on Thursday of week 6 and the assignment will be submitted by Thursday of week 7. </p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><span>&nbsp;</span></p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;">Since written work is a significant part of the course assessment, particular attention will be given to students&rsquo; basic writing skills and their skills in developing and structuring arguments in writing. For this reason, a professor in the Writing Laboratory will evaluate the submitted assignments. If the writing professor considers it necessary, he or she will provide students with advice on their assignments by email or by appointment, and students will then have 24 hours to revise their assignments in the light of this advice. Grading of the assignment will be conditional on satisfactory collaboration with the writing professor.</p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"> </p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;">The final assignment will be based on students&rsquo; research work in the third part of the course. This will concern a topic either chosen from among those suggested by the professor or developed from students&rsquo; own particular interests. After undertaking and presenting his or her research work in a small group (see &lsquo;Project presentation&rsquo; below), each student will develop the work into a final written assignment, in response to a question agreed with the professor. This assignment will be 1400-1600 words in length and will be submitted within two weeks of the group presentation.</p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><b><span>&nbsp;</span></b></p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><i>Project presentation: 10%</i></p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><b> </b></p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;">The research work on a topic in the third part of the course will initially be done in small groups, each of which will present their findings regarding a particular topic to the class. Group presentations will be evaluated according to the research displayed, the argument developed and the formal qualities of the presentation. </p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"> </p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><i>End-of-course written examination: 20%</i></p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><b> </b></p> <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><span>The examination will consist of an essay written over an hour and a half under examination conditions. The examination questions will be distributed on Thursday of<b> </b>week 13 and at the examination, to take place in week 15, students will be given two of these questions to choose from. <b></b></span></p> 

-ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:

Students will be assessed according to the learning outcomes. Thus threshold (grade C) work will demonstrate a basic understanding of relevant cases, positions and arguments and of relevant theoretical approaches, a familiarity with some relevant readings, some ability to analyze and evaluate this material and the ability to present and discuss it with some clarity. Good (grade B) and excellent (grade A) work will demonstrate a more thorough grasp of the relevant material, more depth and independence of analysis and evaluation and more clarity and precision in presentation and discussion, while poor (grade D) and fail grade (grade F) level work will reveal substantial deficiencies in understanding, analysis and/or presentation.

John Cabot University’s general assessment criteria

A (95%+) and A- (90-94%) work is relatively rare, expected to stand out from the work of other students and:

directly addresses the question or problem raised, provides a coherent argument displaying an extensive knowledge of relevant information, critically evaluates concepts and theory, relates theory to practice, reflects the student’s own argument and is not just a repetition of standard lecture and reference material, is very accurate, has an element of novelty if not originality, provides evidence of reading beyond the required reading and displays an awareness of methodological concerns and displays an awareness of the limitations of current knowledge.

B+ (87-89%) and B (83-86%) grades indicate a highly competent level of performance and:

directly addresses the question or problem raised, provides a coherent argument drawing on relevant information, shows some ability to evaluate concepts and theory and to relate theory to practice, reflects the student’s own argument and is not just a repetition of standard lecture and reference material, does not suffer from any major errors or omissions, provides evidence of reading beyond the required reading and displays an awareness of other approaches to the problem area.

B- (80-82%) or C+ (77-79%) work is an acceptable level of performance and:

addresses the question but provides only a basic outline of relevant arguments and evidence along the lines offered in the lectures and referenced readings, gives answers that are clear but limited and with some minor omissions and inaccuracies, although no major errors.

C (73-76%) or C- (70-72%) work demonstrates some knowledge and an element of understanding, but is weak and:

points made in the answer are not always well supported by argument and evidence, relevant points have been omitted from the answer, there are some errors in the answer, parts of the question remain unanswered and answers may be unduly brief and possibly in note form.

D+ (67-69%), D (63-66%) or D- (60-62%) work does just enough to persuade the instructor that they should not be failed and:

answers lack a coherent grasp of the problems and issues raised in the question, important information has been omitted from the answers and irrelevant points have been included and answers are far too brief.

Fail (below 60%) work fails to convince the instructor that students have benefited from academic study and:

fails to show any knowledge or understanding of the issues raised in the question, reveals fundamental misunderstanding of the subject matter and most of the material in the answer is irrelevant.


-ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS:

See 'Class participation' in 'Assessment methods' above.
ACADEMIC HONESTY
As stated in the university catalog, any student who commits an act of academic dishonesty will receive a failing grade on the work in which the dishonesty occurred. In addition, acts of academic dishonesty, irrespective of the weight of the assignment, may result in the student receiving a failing grade in the course. Instances of academic dishonesty will be reported to the Dean of Academic Affairs. A student who is reported twice for academic dishonesty is subject to summary dismissal from the University. In such a case, the Academic Council will then make a recommendation to the President, who will make the final decision.
STUDENTS WITH LEARNING OR OTHER DISABILITIES
John Cabot University does not discriminate on the basis of disability or handicap. Students with approved accommodations must inform their professors at the beginning of the term. Please see the website for the complete policy.

SCHEDULE

Week     Topic                                   Tuesday                                  Thursday                 

 

1.            Introduction to business ethics                                            Taxes in Italy

              

               Part I. Introductory cases

2.                                                         Ben & Jerry’s                          General Motors

3.                                                         AIDS drugs                            Genetic engineering

 

               Part II. Contemporary debates

4.            Free markets                         For and against markets          Wal-Mart                                                      

5.            Social responsibilities            Concepts of CSR                    Coca-Cola and Starbucks

6.            Government                         Freedom and equality             Healthcare reform

7.            Review for mid-term assignment + Project work preparation

 
               Part III. Stakeholder groups

8.            Consumers                           Choice                                     Industrial food + Fast food

9.            Shareholders                        Profits                                     Anti-corporate + Financial crisis

10.          Workers                              Protection and participation    Sweatshops + Working in the US

11.          Communities                        Social contract                        Social business + Media power                                                           

12.          Environment                        Sustainability                         Oil + Green business

13.          Foreign countries                 Cosmopolitanism                    International business + Tourism

14.         Review for final examination