JCU Logo

JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY

COURSE CODE: "BUS 301-2"
COURSE NAME: "Business Ethics"
SEMESTER & YEAR: Spring Semester 2012
SYLLABUS

INSTRUCTOR: Biggs Colin
EMAIL: [email protected]
HOURS: TTH 11:30-12:45
TOTAL NO. OF CONTACT HOURS: 45
CREDITS: 3
PREREQUISITES: Prerequisite: Junior Standing
OFFICE HOURS: By arrangement

COURSE DESCRIPTION:

This course considers some of the most important ethical issues in business today.

Students will examine such issues as businesses’ responsibilities to shareholders, workers and consumers, the pros and cons of ‘free markets’, the challenges raised by globalisation and environmental damage, ideas of ‘ethical’ investment and consumption and the special dilemmas posed by international trade and multinational businesses.

Issues will be studied through a selection of contemporary cases, issues, arguments and approaches, along with much class discussion, with the aim of helping students to develop a familiarity with the debates and their ability to discuss, reflect on and defend their own ethical views. The course thus does not take an exclusively ‘strategic’ (the instrumental management of ethical issues by business), ‘theoretical’ (the study of abstract ethical theory, then ‘applied’ to cases) or ‘preaching’ (the moral improvement of students) approach, but rather combines elements of these approaches within the broader activity of developing students’ own ethical views.  

SUMMARY OF COURSE CONTENT:

See 'Schedule' below.

LEARNING OUTCOMES:

By the end of the course students will be able to: 

• recognize and analyse ethical issues raised by contemporary business in its relations with shareholders, workers, consumers, the wider society, government and the environment;

• analyse relevant recent cases, along with specific positions and arguments regarding them; 

• analyse and employ broader theoretical approaches, debates and concepts in contemporary business ethics;

• develop informed, reasoned positions regarding these issues, cases and broader aspects; 

• present, discuss and analyse course material orally and in written forms and in individual and group contexts;                                   

• make appropriate use of original and academic resources and undertake guided research work.

TEXTBOOK:
NONE
REQUIRED RESERVED READING:
NONE

RECOMMENDED RESERVED READING:
NONE
GRADING POLICY
-ASSESSMENT METHODS:
AssignmentGuidelinesWeight
ParticipationRegular attendance and sustained active participation in class discussion20%
Midterm projectProject of 2,000 words35%
Final examinationCase-based examination45%

-ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:

Assessment Guidelines for assigning main letter grades: A, B, C,D, and F.

Students will be assessed according to the learning outcomes. Thus threshold (grade C) work will demonstrate a basic understanding of relevant cases, positions and arguments and of relevant theoretical approaches, a familiarity with some relevant readings, some ability to analyze and evaluate this material and the ability to present and discuss it with some clarity. Good (grade B) and excellent (grade A) work will demonstrate a more thorough grasp of the relevant material, more depth and independence of analysis and evaluation and more clarity and precision in presentation and discussion, while poor (grade D) and fail grade (grade F) level work will reveal substantial deficiencies in understanding, analysis and/or presentation.

General JCU assessment criteria

A (95%+) and A- (90-94%) work is relatively rare, expected to stand out from the work of other students and:

directly addresses the question or problem raised, provides a coherent argument displaying an extensive knowledge of relevant information, critically evaluates concepts and theory, relates theory to practice, reflects the student’s own argument and is not just a repetition of standard lecture and reference material, is very accurate, has an element of novelty if not originality, provides evidence of reading beyond the required reading and displays an awareness of methodological concerns and displays an awareness of the limitations of current knowledge.

B+ (87-89%) and B (83-86%) grades indicate a highly competent level of performance and:

directly addresses the question or problem raised, provides a coherent argument drawing on relevant information, shows some ability to evaluate concepts and theory and to relate theory to practice, reflects the student’s own argument and is not just a repetition of standard lecture and reference material, does not suffer from any major errors or omissions, provides evidence of reading beyond the required reading and displays an awareness of other approaches to the problem area.

B- (80-82%) or C+ (77-79%) work is an acceptable level of performance and:

addresses the question but provides only a basic outline of relevant arguments and evidence along the lines offered in the lectures and referenced readings, gives answers that are clear but limited and with some minor omissions and inaccuracies, although no major errors.

C (73-76%) or C- (70-72%) work demonstrates some knowledge and an element of understanding, but is weak and:

points made in the answer are not always well supported by argument and evidence, relevant points have been omitted from the answer, there are some errors in the answer, parts of the question remain unanswered and answers may be unduly brief and possibly in note form.

D+ (67-69%), D (63-66%) or D- (60-62%) work does just enough to persuade the instructor that they should not be failed and:

answers lack a coherent grasp of the problems and issues raised in the question, important information has been omitted from the answers and irrelevant points have been included and answers are far too brief.

Fail (below 60%) work fails to convince the instructor that students have benefited from academic study and:

fails to show any knowledge or understanding of the issues raised in the question, reveals fundamental misunderstanding of the subject matter and most of the material in the answer is irrelevant.


-ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS:

See 'Class participation' under 'Assessment methods' above.

ACADEMIC HONESTY
As stated in the university catalog, any student who commits an act of academic dishonesty will receive a failing grade on the work in which the dishonesty occurred. In addition, acts of academic dishonesty, irrespective of the weight of the assignment, may result in the student receiving a failing grade in the course. Instances of academic dishonesty will be reported to the Dean of Academic Affairs. A student who is reported twice for academic dishonesty is subject to summary dismissal from the University. In such a case, the Academic Council will then make a recommendation to the President, who will make the final decision.
STUDENTS WITH LEARNING OR OTHER DISABILITIES
John Cabot University does not discriminate on the basis of disability or handicap. Students with approved accommodations must inform their professors at the beginning of the term. Please see the website for the complete policy.

SCHEDULE

Course Outline

Week     Topic                                   Tuesday                                 Thursday 

1.            Introduction to business ethics                                              An American in Italy

               Part I. Introductory cases

2.                                                        Ben & Jerry’s                          General Motors

3.                                                        AIDS drugs                             Genetic engineering

               Part II. Contemporary debates

4.            Free markets                        For and against markets          Wal-Mart

5.            Social responsibilities            Concepts of CSR                    Coca-Cola

6.            Government                         Fairness and equality                Healthcare

 

7.            Review for mid-term assignment + Project work preparation

 

               Part III. Stakeholder groups           

8.            Consumers                           Choice                                    Industrial food + Fast food

9.            Workers                               Protection and participation     Working in the US + Sweatshops

10.          Investors                              Shareholder value                    Financial crisis + Anti-corporate

11.          Communities                         Democracy                             Social business + Media power

12.          Environment                          Sustainability                           Oil + Green business

13.          Foreign countries                  Cosmopolitanism                     International business + Tourism

14.          Review for final examination