JCU Logo

JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY

COURSE CODE: "CMS 399A"
COURSE NAME: "Special Topics: Social Media & Cybercultures"
SEMESTER & YEAR: Spring Semester 2012
SYLLABUS

INSTRUCTOR: Seganti Francesca Romana
EMAIL: [email protected]
HOURS: TTH 17:30-18:45
TOTAL NO. OF CONTACT HOURS: 45
CREDITS: 3
PREREQUISITES: Prerequisite: COM 220
OFFICE HOURS: by appointment

COURSE DESCRIPTION:
 

·      Identify and analyze different types and functions of online social media. 

·      Critically evaluate different conceptual theoretical frameworks offering an analysis of online social media.

·      Understand and discuss the current and potential future implications of social media on cultures, politics, and identities.  

·      Analyze and develop interpretive and evaluative arguments about cyberculture issues. 

·      Research and analyze dynamics of interaction between the participants of social media according to gender, regional context of origin and social class, and rate of adoption of new technologies, considering how these could affect their social lives both online and offline.

SUMMARY OF COURSE CONTENT:

This course will investigate specific themes such as the social and political movements that take place within cyberspace, the formation of online communities, and online-identities and bodies. Particular attention will be paid to the analysis of the dynamics of interaction between participants of social media. It will be considered how online interaction can affect users' social lives both online and offline and to what extent these challenge our traditional assumptions about politics and society. In the light of access issues, and of the debate on the crisis of traditional communities, the course will provide students with a more in-depth understanding of the new forms of cohabitation that online social media support. The course will analyze whether and how social media contribute to the transformation of daily lives by providing a space that empowers collective dialogues and a space for rethinking the practice of public engagement. Through readings, in-class discussion, writing and a ethnographic/research project students will gain a greater understanding of cyberspace, its culture/s, and of how online interactions impact on the participants' lives offline, society and politics.

LEARNING OUTCOMES:
 
  • Students will be expected to acquire a firm knowledge of online cultures and social media and everyday life. They will learn to engage in critically informed argument and to situate ideas about social media and earlier communication technologies in a context.
  • Students will learn how we use mediated language and nonverbal behaviour to develop and maintain communities, social networks, new social ties, and to maintain relationships in our everyday lives
  • Students will be trained in basic research skills which will be foundational for study at a more advanced level.
TEXTBOOK:
NONE
REQUIRED RESERVED READING:
NONE

RECOMMENDED RESERVED READING:
NONE
GRADING POLICY
-ASSESSMENT METHODS:
AssignmentGuidelinesWeight
Mid-term Exam 25%
Attendance/Participation 10%
Written Assignments 10%
Final group digital ethnographic research project and presentation 25%
Final Exam 30%

-ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:

Assessment Guidelines for assigning main letter grades: A, B, C,D, and F.

A:  Work of this quality directly addresses the question or problem raised and provides a coherent argument displaying an extensiveknowledge of relevant information or content. This type of work demonstrates the ability to critically evaluate concepts and theory and has an element of novelty and originality. There is clear evidence of a significant amount of reading beyond that required for the course.

B:  This is highly competent level of performance and directly addresses the question or problem raised.

There is a demonstration of some ability to critically evaluate theory and concepts and relate them to practice. Discussions reflect the student’s own arguments and are not simply a repetition of standard lecture and reference material. The work does not suffer from any major errors or omissions and provides evidence of reading beyond the required assignments.

C:  This is an acceptable level of performance and provides answers that are clear but limited, reflecting the information offered in the lectures and reference readings.

D:  This level of performances demonstrates that the student lacks a coherent grasp of the material.

Important information is omitted and irrelevant points included.In effect, the student has barely done enough to persuade the instructor that s/he should not fail.

F: This work fails to show any knowledge or understanding of the issues raised in the question. Most of the material in the answer is irrelevant.


Grading Standards:             A   95-100 %                       C+   77-79 %
                                            A-  90-94 %                         C   74-76 %
                                            B+  87-89 %                        C-  70-73 %
                                            B     84-86 %                        D   60-69 %
                                            B-    80 83 %                        F    below


-ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS:
  You are expected to do the readings assigned and engage in class discussions, debate ideas and approaches, interact within online communities, and create a final ethnographic project and presentation. Late papers will be penalized unless there is an official excuse from the Dean’s Office. The professor defines what constitutes a legitimate excuse and reserves the right not to grant full credit for assignments turned in under these circumstances.  Attendance is taken at the start of each class. Late arrival will be marked as such. Each 2 late arrivals count as an absence. Students with more than two unexcused absences will see a reduction in their overall final grade.
ACADEMIC HONESTY
As stated in the university catalog, any student who commits an act of academic dishonesty will receive a failing grade on the work in which the dishonesty occurred. In addition, acts of academic dishonesty, irrespective of the weight of the assignment, may result in the student receiving a failing grade in the course. Instances of academic dishonesty will be reported to the Dean of Academic Affairs. A student who is reported twice for academic dishonesty is subject to summary dismissal from the University. In such a case, the Academic Council will then make a recommendation to the President, who will make the final decision.
STUDENTS WITH LEARNING OR OTHER DISABILITIES
John Cabot University does not discriminate on the basis of disability or handicap. Students with approved accommodations must inform their professors at the beginning of the term. Please see the website for the complete policy.

SCHEDULE

Week 1, Jan. 17 and 19 / Introduction/ Social Media Applications: a Review/The Stages of Internet Studies


Wellman B. (2004) "The three ages of Internet Studies: ten, five and zero years ago", New Media and Society 6(1), pp.123-129

Macek J. (2005) "Defining Cyberculture", Média realita (ed. by Binková, P. – Volek, J., Masaryk University Press, 2004

Week 2, Jan. 24 and 26 / Frameworks for an Analysis of Identity and Culture

Appadurai A. (1990) "Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy" in Featherstone, M. (ed.) Global culture: nationalism, globalization and modernity: a Theory, culture & society special issue London: Sage Publication, pp.295-309

Woodward, Identity and difference

Week 3, Jan. 31 Feb. 2/ Interpretations of the Concept of Community in the New Media Age/ Deadline to form teams

Bakardjieva, M. (2003) ‘Virtual togetherness: an everyday-life perspective’, Media, Culture & Society 25, pp.291-313

—  & Feenberg, A. (2004) ‘Virtual Community: ‘no killer implication’’, New Media and Society 6(1), pp.37-43

Wellman, B. (2001) Physical Place and Cyber Place, the Rise of Personalised Networking, The International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 25(2)

Week 4, Feb. 7 and 9/ Internet Methodologies

Gephart, R. (1999) ‘Paradigms and Research Methods’, Research Methods Forum, 4, pp.1-9 [Online]. Available at: http://www.aom.pace.edu/rmd/1999 (Accessed: 1 May 2004)

Christine Hine (2008). “Virtual ethnography: Modes, varieties, affordances,” In: Nigel Fielding, Raymond M. Lee and Grant Blank (editors). The SAGE handbook of online research methods. Los Angeles: SAGE, pp. 257–270.

Week 5, Feb 14 and 16/Internet Methodologies/ First draft due

Ess, E. & the AoIR ethics working committee (2002) Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the aoir ethics working committee [Online].
Available at: www.aoir.org (Accessed: 1 April 2007)


Week 6, Feb 21 and 23/ Sociability Online/

danah boyd (2006) "Identity Production in a Networked Culture: Why Youth Heart MySpace." American Association for the Advancement of Science, St. Louis, MO. February 19.

d. boyd, 2010. "Friendship" In I. Mizuko (editor) Hanging Out, Messing Around, Geeking Out: Living and Learning with New Media, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp.79-115.

Week 7, Feb. 28, Mar. 1/ Ethnicity and Gender in Cyberspace

O'Brien, J. (2000) ‘Writing in the Body: Gender (Re)Production in Online Interaction’, in Smith, A. C. & Kollock, P., Communities in Cyberspace. London and New York: Routledge, pp.76-104

Consalvo, M. (2009) 'The virtual Census, Representations of race, gender and age in video games', Media Culture and Society, 11(5), pp.815:834

Week 8, Mar. 6 / Review/ March 8 Mid-term/

Week 9, Mar. 13 and 15/ Online Subcultures/ Research Proposal DUE
Bennett, A. (2004) "Virtual Subculture? Youth Identity and the Internet," In A. Bennett and K. Kahn-Harris (editors) After Subculture: Critical Studies in Contemporary Youth Culture, New York: Palgrave MacMillian, pp. 162-172.Field work begins

Hodkinson, P. (2007) "Interactive Online Journals and Individualisation," New Media and Society, 9 (4) pp. 625-650.

Stahl, G. (1999) "Still 'Winning Space?': Updating Subcultural Theory," Invisible Culture: An Electronic Journal for Visual Studies. 2, Visual & Cultural Studies Program, University of Rochester

SPRING BREAK

Week 10, Mar. 27 and 29/ Online Diasporas
Tsagarousianou. (2004) "Rethinking the concept of diaspora, connectivity and communication in a globalized world", Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 1(1), pp.52-65

Mitra A. (2006) "Towards finding a cybernetic safe place: illustrations from people of Indian origin", New Media and Society 8(2), pp.251–268

—. (2005) "Creating immigrant identities in cybernetic space: examples from a non-resident Indian website", Media, Culture & Society 27(3), pp.371-390.

Week 11, Apr. 3 and 5/ Online Political Activism/ Data analysis begins
Bakardjieva, M. (2009) "Subactivism: Lifeworld and Politics in the Age of the Internet", Information Society, 25(2), 91-104.

Lacey, A (2005) "Networked Communities: Social Centers and Activist Spaces in Contemporary Britain", Space and Culture 8(3), pp.286-301.

Week 12, Apr. 10 and 12/ Love and Sexuality on the Internet
Döring, N. (2009) "The Internet Impact on Sexuality: a Critical Review of 15 years of Research". Computers in Human Behaviour, 25, 1089-1101.

Ross, M. (2005) "Typing, doing and being: sexuality and the Internet", The Journal of Sex Research 42(4), pp. 342.-352

Cooper, A., McLoughlin, I. P., & Campbell, K. M. (2000) "Sexuality in cyberspace: Update for the 21st century", CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, pp. 521-536.

Week 13, Apr. 17 and 19/ Ethnographic Research Presentations  
Week 14, Apr. 24 and 26/ Ethnographic Research Presentations/Review for final Exam

SessionSession FocusReading AssignmentOther AssignmentMeeting Place/Exam Dates