JCU Logo

JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY

COURSE CODE: "PH 101-3"
COURSE NAME: "Introduction to Philosophical Thinking"
SEMESTER & YEAR: Spring 2026
SYLLABUS

INSTRUCTOR: David Levy
EMAIL: [email protected]
HOURS: MW 10:00 AM 11:15 AM
TOTAL NO. OF CONTACT HOURS: 45
CREDITS: 3
PREREQUISITES:
OFFICE HOURS: By appointment

COURSE DESCRIPTION:
We all have opinions about what is true and false, right and wrong, what is just, divine, and beautiful, what the self, mind, and soul are, or what makes us free. But can we justify our opinions about such things? Have we given rational and open-minded consideration to criticisms and alternatives, or are our opinions perhaps based only on prejudices and assumptions? In this course you will learn to use philosophical thinking to test and improve your opinions and your ability to evaluate the claims of important philosophers. Through the study and discussion of philosophical texts, classic or contemporary, you will grapple with issues of fundamental human importance and develop your capacities for careful reading, clear writing and speaking, and logical argumentation.
SUMMARY OF COURSE CONTENT:

This course will explore philosophical questions concerning a number of different but related themes, including science, technology, political ambition, and self-knowledge, through readings from Plato, Aristotle, Francis Bacon, Martin Heidegger and others.

Our age is characterized by unprecedented scientific and technological progress. This progress has produced immense benefits for humankind and at the same time poses grave dangers. What posture should we adopt toward our ever more technological world and our ever-greater dependence on technology? Should we embrace these developments or resist them?

To consider these questions properly it will be helpful to return to the origins. What we call “technology” is a consequence of the modern scientific project, which came into being in the 17th century. The founders of this project included great philosophers such as Francis Bacon and René Descartes. In their works are to be found the original justifications for our scientific and technological society.

But to understand and evaluate these justifications we must go back even further, to the pre-modern approach to science which the moderns deliberately rejected. The leading exponent of that approach and the main target of the moderns’ attack was Aristotle, who argued for the priority of form over matter and held that scientific knowledge ought to be pursued as an end in itself rather than for any practical utility. The moderns, by contrast, argued for a materialistic understanding of nature and demanded a new, practical goal for science: to master nature and make it serve human needs.

This course, therefore, begins with Aristotle, followed by Francis Bacon as a representative of the modern project. Next, we take up more recent views on technology through essays by Martin Heidegger and others.

Last but not least we will return once more to the origins, to Greek philosophy, in order to consider Socrates’ quest for a science of the human good, a science inseparable from self-knowledge. In particular we will examine Plato’s account of Socrates’ intriguing relationship with Alcibiades, a young man of brilliant talents and high political ambition whom Socrates attempts to convert to the philosophic life. 

A note of the use of "Artificial Intelligence":

Our purpose in this course is to do our own reading, writing, and thinking, not to outsource these tasks to a machine. I therefore recommend that you avoid using “generative AI” entirely. But if you do make use of it for any of your written work, to avoid plagiarism you must cite your AI source in accordance with JCU guidelines: https://johncabot.libguides.com/artificial-intelligence/using. If you wish to use an AI-assisted grammar tool such as Grammarly, please consult me first.

LEARNING OUTCOMES:

1. Gain understanding of some major philosophical questions and of how they might be relevant to our lives today.

2. Gain experience in the art of careful reading. In the words of Sherlock Holmes, "Never trust to general impressions, but concentrate yourself upon details," for "the little things are infinitely the most important."

3. Improve your capacity for rigorous thinking and for clear writing and speaking.

TEXTBOOK:
Book TitleAuthorPublisherISBN numberLibrary Call NumberCommentsFormatLocal BookstoreOnline Purchase
Socrates and Alcibiades: Four TextsPlatoFocus9781585100699  Hard Copy  
REQUIRED RESERVED READING:
NONE

RECOMMENDED RESERVED READING:
NONE
GRADING POLICY
-ASSESSMENT METHODS:
AssignmentGuidelinesWeight
class participation(1) Students are expected to attend all classes (barring illness or other compelling reason), to have done the assigned reading carefully prior to class, and to be prepared to contribute meaningfully to class discussions. You must use the specified editions of the texts and you must bring a hard copy of the reading to each class. The use of electronic devices in class is not permitted. (2) When doing the assigned readings, mark up the text (in pencil). This facilitates careful reading and active engagement with the text. Your work will be checked periodically during the semester. (3) A written reflection consisting of one brief, well-crafted paragraph (double-spaced, please) on the assigned reading must be turned in at the beginning of every class, except when a paper is due. (If you are absent, bring the reflection to the following class.) The reflection should interpret a section of the reading or pose a good question, and must demonstrate that you have studied the text carefully and thoughtfully. Needless to say, if you make use of secondary sources (including AI) in writing your reflections you must provide proper citation. (4) Be punctual and do not leave the room during class except in cases of emergencies. Eating in class is not permitted (drinking is OK).20
2 papersApproximately 1200 words each. Late papers will be assessed a penalty unless an extension has been granted in advance. You must cite in your paper the assigned editions and translations of the readings. Please conserve your preparatory notes, outline, and drafts as I may ask to see them. I may also examine you orally on your paper (outside of class). Please note that your papers will be submitted to Turnitin, a plagiarism detection program. 40
mid-term examIn-class exam consisting of essays on the assigned readings.15
final examIn-class exam consisting of essay questions on the readings for the semester.25

-ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
A Work of this quality provides a coherent, orderly argument based on a very careful reading of the relevant texts and a solid understanding of the relevant issues. The student displays superior reasoning skills and has done a good deal of original thinking about the material. He or she knows how to raise important questions about the text and to evaluate possible answers to them. The student writes very clearly and has a near-perfect command of English usage and grammar. (Appropriate allowances are made for those for whom English is not a first language.)
BThis is a good level of performance. The student displays a capacity for careful reading and good reasoning. The work reflects some original thinking and is not simply a repetition of lecture material and readings. The work does not suffer from any major errors or omissions. The student writes clearly and has a good command of English usage and grammar.
CThis is an acceptable, or fair, level of performance. The student provides answers that are clear but limited, consisting mainly in a repetition of the text or lectures. The student has some ability to write clearly and correctly.
DThe student fails to demonstrate a coherent grasp of the material. Important information is omitted and/or irrelevant points included. The paper is poorly organized, and the student shows limited ability to write clearly and correctly.
FThis work fails to show any significant knowledge of the texts and the issues. Most of the material is irrelevant or inaccurate. There is no coherent argument and the student shows little ability to write clearly and correctly. This grade is also given for an act of plagiarism or other form of academic dishonesty.

-ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS:
ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS AND EXAMINATION POLICY
You cannot make-up a major exam (midterm or final) without the permission of the Dean’s Office. The Dean’s Office will grant such permission only when the absence was caused by a serious impediment, such as a documented illness, hospitalization or death in the immediate family (in which you must attend the funeral) or other situations of similar gravity. Absences due to other meaningful conflicts, such as job interviews, family celebrations, travel difficulties, student misunderstandings or personal convenience, will not be excused. Students who will be absent from a major exam must notify the Dean’s Office prior to that exam. Absences from class due to the observance of a religious holiday will normally be excused. Individual students who will have to miss class to observe a religious holiday should notify the instructor by the end of the Add/Drop period to make prior arrangements for making up any work that will be missed. The final exam period runs until ____________
ACADEMIC HONESTY
As stated in the university catalog, any student who commits an act of academic dishonesty will receive a failing grade on the work in which the dishonesty occurred. In addition, acts of academic dishonesty, irrespective of the weight of the assignment, may result in the student receiving a failing grade in the course. Instances of academic dishonesty will be reported to the Dean of Academic Affairs. A student who is reported twice for academic dishonesty is subject to summary dismissal from the University. In such a case, the Academic Council will then make a recommendation to the President, who will make the final decision.
STUDENTS WITH LEARNING OR OTHER DISABILITIES
John Cabot University does not discriminate on the basis of disability or handicap. Students with approved accommodations must inform their professors at the beginning of the term. Please see the website for the complete policy.

SCHEDULE

Preliminary schedule (a complete schedule will be available on Moodle)

Weeks 1-8: Science, technology, Enlightenment. Readings from Aristotle, Bacon, Heidegger et al.

Weeks 9-14: Socrates, Alcibiades, and the science of the good. Readings from Plato's dialogues.