JCU Logo

JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY

COURSE CODE: "PH 232"
COURSE NAME: "Kant"
SEMESTER & YEAR: Spring 2026
SYLLABUS

INSTRUCTOR: Steven Joseph Woodworth
EMAIL: [email protected]
HOURS: TTH 1:30 PM 2:45 PM
TOTAL NO. OF CONTACT HOURS: 45
CREDITS: 3
PREREQUISITES:
OFFICE HOURS:

COURSE DESCRIPTION:
This course introduces you to Immanuel Kant’s revolutionary ideas and arguments about such things as the self, reality, knowledge, morality, history, beauty, and nature. That is, it introduces you to his attempts to answer the foundational philosophical questions, “what am I?”, “what is real?”, “what do I know?”, “what should I do?,” “what is beauty?”, and “what is nature?”. In doing so, it explores issues like the nature of change and time, what it is to think, believe, or imagine something, the relation between mind and matter, the freedom of the will, whether morality is objective, and the rationality of believing in God.
SUMMARY OF COURSE CONTENT:

The course begins with a brief introduction to the life and thought of Immanuel Kant. We then spend a couple weeks exploring the main claims of two of Kant's most impactful predecessors, the rationalist and polymath Gottfried Leibniz, and the empiricist and skeptic David Hume. The rest of the course divides into three parts: i) an overview of key moments of Kant's transcendental idealism and critique of metaphysics, especially as presented in the Critique of Pure Reason; ii) a close reading of the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, with an emphasis on the various formulations of the Categorical Imperative and the role of autonomy in Kant's ethics; and iii) a brief foray into Kant's Critique of the Power of Judgment, with sessions devoted to Kant's theory of beauty, the sublime, taste, and natural teleology.

LEARNING OUTCOMES:

In this course you will:

--- Read and analyze the works of Immanuel Kant in translation.

--- Reconstruct a holistic philosophical system from various works, all the while recognizing where there is room, and necessity, for interpretation.

--- Learn to structure your reading and research activities in such a way to focus on the claims and arguments that are important for your particular interests, which might not always be the author's main concern.

--- Gain an in-depth understanding of the categorical imperative and the way in which the value of autonomy structures Kant's ethics.

--- Develop the public speaking skills required to participate in and actively contribute to high-level philosophy seminars.

--- Elaborate the writing skills required for the development and defense of our own theses in an extended argument.

TEXTBOOK:
NONE
REQUIRED RESERVED READING:
NONE

RECOMMENDED RESERVED READING:
NONE
GRADING POLICY
-ASSESSMENT METHODS:
AssignmentGuidelinesWeight
ParticipationClasses will involve a mixture of lectures, seminar discussions, small group work, debates, and other activities. The emphasis will be on helping you to develop your own opinions and arguments and your ability to discuss them with others, as well as your understanding of the materials, issues, and relevant ethical concepts and arguments. Your active involvement in discussions and other class activities, based on adequate preparation outside class, is essential.20
PresentationYou will be responsible for one short, in-class presentation over the course of the semester. The goal is to help set the tone of the session by picking out some aspect of the day's topics and readings which interests you in particular, and then communicating that something to your classmates, thereby kicking off discussion. 10
EssaysI will assign two 1,500-to-2,000-word essays during the semester, releasing prompts two weeks before the deadline. For the second essay you may also suggest your own topic, but it must be approved by me at least ten days before the due date. The essays are worth 20% each.40
Final ExamA final exam will take place during the designated exam week, covering material from the beginning to end of the course. You will have to answer several short-form questions as well as produce a short essay. Possible questions for the short essay will be provided during the last week of classes; on the exam you will be presented a small selection of these, from which you will answer one.30

-ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
AWork of this quality directly addresses the question or problem raised and provides a coherent argument displaying an extensive knowledge of relevant information or content. This type of work demonstrates the ability to critically evaluate concepts and theory and has an element of novelty and originality. There is clear evidence of a significant amount of reading beyond that required for the course.
BThis is highly competent level of performance and directly addresses the question or problem raised.There is a demonstration of some ability to critically evaluatetheory and concepts and relate them to practice. Discussions reflect the student’s own arguments and are not simply a repetition of standard lecture andreference material. The work does not suffer from any major errors or omissions and provides evidence of reading beyond the required assignments.
CThis is an acceptable level of performance and provides answers that are clear but limited, reflecting the information offered in the lectures and reference readings.
DThis level of performances demonstrates that the student lacks a coherent grasp of the material.Important information is omitted and irrelevant points included.In effect, the student has barely done enough to persuade the instructor that s/he should not fail.
FThis work fails to show any knowledge or understanding of the issues raised in the question. Most of the material in the answer is irrelevant.

-ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS:

I expect you to arrive at class on time, prepared for the day's material. I highly recommend that you attend all classes given that the material is comprehensive by nature. Attendance will be considered in your participation grade, and more than two unexcused absences during the semester will result in a lower score. You'll find the Excused Absences Request Form on the Registrar's website: https://www.johncabot.edu/registrar/. You can read more about the University's attendance policy, which lists common reasons for an Excused absence, in the Student Handbook: https://www.johncabot.edu/student-life/campus-services/jcu-undergraduate-handbook-2025-26.pdf, starting p. 9. You are responsible for all material covered and discussed in class, whether or not you are actually present in class.

Note that you cannot make-up a major exam (midterm or final) without the permission of the Dean's Office. The Dean's Office will grant such permission only when the absence was caused by a serious impediment, such as a documented illness, hospitalization or death in the immediate family (in which you must attend the funeral) or other situations of similar gravity. Absences due to other meaningful conflicts, such as job interviews, family celebrations, travel difficulties, student misunderstandings or personal convenience, will not be excused. Students seeking an excuse from an examination must submit the Excused Absences Request Form as soon as possible.

ACADEMIC HONESTY
As stated in the university catalog, any student who commits an act of academic dishonesty will receive a failing grade on the work in which the dishonesty occurred. In addition, acts of academic dishonesty, irrespective of the weight of the assignment, may result in the student receiving a failing grade in the course. Instances of academic dishonesty will be reported to the Dean of Academic Affairs. A student who is reported twice for academic dishonesty is subject to summary dismissal from the University. In such a case, the Academic Council will then make a recommendation to the President, who will make the final decision.
STUDENTS WITH LEARNING OR OTHER DISABILITIES
John Cabot University does not discriminate on the basis of disability or handicap. Students with approved accommodations must inform their professors at the beginning of the term. Please see the website for the complete policy.

SCHEDULE

Week 1: Introduction to the Course and Kant's Life and Work

---readings: Kant, "What is Enlightenment?"

 

Week 2: Rationalism and Idealism

---readings: selections from Leibniz, Discourse on Metaphysics

 

Week 3: Empiricism and Skepticism

---readings: selections from Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding

 

Week 4: Kant's Copernican revolution

---readings: prefaces and introduction to the Critique of Pure Reason

 

Week 5: Space, time, and transcendental idealism

---readings: The Critique of Pure Reason, Transcendental Aesthetic

 

Week 6: Transcendental arguments and the categories of the understanding

---readings: The Critique of Pure Reason, Transcendental Logic

 

Week 7: Kant on mathematics and science

---readings: The Critique of Pure Reason, chapter II of the Analytic of Principles, "System of all principles of pure understanding" and selection from the Doctrine of Method.

 

Week 8: Kant's critique of metaphysics

---readings: selections from the Critique of Pure Reason, Transcendental Dialectic, including the "Ideal of Pure Reason"

 

Week 9: Introduction to Kant's ethics

---readings: Groundwork, Introduction and Section I

 

Week 10: The Categorical Imperative

---readings: Groundwork, Section II

 

Week 11: Autonomy and Transcendental Freedom

---readings: Groundwork, Section III, selection from the Critique of Practical Reason ("Fact of Reason"), and selection from the Critique of Pure Reason (Third Antinomy)

 

Week 12: Kant's theory of beauty and taste

---selections from the Critique of the Power of Judgment

 

Week 13: Kant on teleology and purpose

---selections from the Critique of the Power of Judgment

 

Week 14: Review, Recap, and Exam Prep

---no new readings

 

Week 15: Final Exam

 

Very highly recommended further reading:

Jessica Williams, "How Conceptually Guided are Kantian Intuitions?"

Henry Allison, Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense

Michael Friedman, Kant and the Exact Sciences

R. Lanier Anderson, The Poverty of Conceptual Truth: Kant's Analytic/Synthetic Distinction and the Limits of Metaphysics, and "On the Two-Step Interpretation of Kant's Dialectical Strategy in Theoretical Philosophy"

David Velleman, "A Brief Introduction to Kantian Ethics"

Christine Korsgaard, "Kant's Formula of Universal Law" and "Kant's Formula of Humanity"

Rachel Cristy, "Does Wine Have a Place in Kant's Theory of Taste?"