JCU Logo

JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY

COURSE CODE: "MKT 375"
COURSE NAME: "Marketing Consulting Lab"
SEMESTER & YEAR: Spring 2026
SYLLABUS

INSTRUCTOR: Anna Fiorentino
EMAIL: [email protected]
HOURS: TTH 8:30 AM 9:45 AM
TOTAL NO. OF CONTACT HOURS: 45
CREDITS: 3
PREREQUISITES: Prerequisites: Junior Standing, MKT 301
OFFICE HOURS:

COURSE DESCRIPTION:
The main goal of this course is to prepare students for problem solving in the workplace and learn how to submit a marketing consulting proposal. In this course, student teams will consult a client company. They will analyze strengths and weaknesses of the business and conduct an accurate environmental analysis. Each team will assess internal and external forces, including competition, and their impact on the performance of the client, after which they will determine the best positioning strategy and customize the marketing mix. The outcome will be a consulting proposal that each team will have to present to their client.
SUMMARY OF COURSE CONTENT:

This course offers a hands-on immersion in marketing consulting, guiding students through key analytical and communication practices inspired by leading consulting firms.
Our client will be Dole Company, a global market leader in fresh produce.
Throughout the semester, students will work in teams to solve one of Dole Italy’s real marketing challenges, applying structured problem-solving, focused analysis, decision-oriented thinking and senior-level communication. 

The Marketing Manager of Dole Italy will participate in four key milestones:
- Initial client briefing on a real marketing issue
- Client interviews conducted by student teams
- Mid-term progress presentations with feedback
- Final presentation and recommendations

While tackling the client challenge, students will be introduced to key consulting approaches and tools, including problem framing, issue structuring, analysis planning, synthesis, and storylining through the Pyramid Principle.
The course will also cultivate professional consulting skills—teamwork, structured communication, leadership, time management, and client interaction.
Throughout the semester, students receive feedback and evaluation at key moments of the consulting process. The external client contributes to the assessment by evaluating the clarity, relevance, and usefulness of students’ work at selected milestones, including the client interview, the draft recommendations, and the final presentation. The Professor is responsible for evaluating the rigor, structure, and quality of the analytical work and overall execution across the project.

LEARNING OUTCOMES:

By the end of the course, students will be able to:

  • Define and frame complex marketing problems using structured methodologies

  • Prepare professional interview guides to gather insights from the client organization

  • Break down multidimensional issues into manageable analytical workstreams

  • Plan and execute targeted analyses that apply a first-principles approach to problem solving

  • Synthesize data into clear, insight-driven findings and coherent recommendations

  • Communicate solutions effectively through storylines, action titles, and the Pyramid Principle, demonstrating clarity, logic, and persuasion

  • Collaborate within consulting teams, manage workflow efficiently, and interact with clients in a professional manner

TEXTBOOK:
NONE
REQUIRED RESERVED READING:
Book TitleAuthorPublisherISBN numberLibrary Call NumberComments
Instructor's slidesAnna Fiorentino--  

RECOMMENDED RESERVED READING:
Book TitleAuthorPublisherISBN numberLibrary Call NumberComments
The Pyramid Principle: Logic in Writing and ThinkingB. MintoPearson Education / FT Publishing International, 2009978-0273710516  
The McKinsey Mind: Understanding and Implementing the Problem-Solving Tools and Management Techniques of the World’s Top Strategic Consulting FirmE. M. Rasiel & P. N. FrigaMcGraw-Hill Education, 2002ISBN 978-0071354176  
GRADING POLICY
-ASSESSMENT METHODS:
AssignmentGuidelinesWeight
Final Recommendations and Presentation to the Client (Team)The external client contributes 50% of the assignment grade by evaluating the relevance, coherence, and applicability of the recommendations, as well as their adherence to the client’s real-life situation, constraints, and stated expectations. The Professor contributes 50% of the assignment grade by evaluating the rigor and coherence of the overall consulting logic, the quality of synthesis, and the effectiveness of executive-level communication, including structure and storytelling. Expected output: An executive-style presentation prepared in PowerPoint, Canva, or PDF format, consisting of a maximum of 15 slides/pages (excluding the cover page), presented to the client. The assessments includes both the quality of the document and the effectiveness of oral delivery.50%
Participation and professional conduct (Individual)Consistent, high-level active engagement and professional conduct throughout the course, including preparation, teamwork, reliability, and professional behavior in both in-class and client-facing activities. Grade given fully by professor based on observable behaviors throughout the semester.20%
Problem Framing and Structuring (Individual)Clarity of problem definition, quality of issue structuring and coherence in translating the client challenge into a well-defined consulting problem. Expected output: Individual written assignment submitted as a Word document (approximately 800–1,000 words). Assessment is conducted by the Professor.30%

-ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
AWork of this quality directly addresses the question or problem raised and provides a coherent argument displaying an extensive knowledge of relevant information or content. This type of work demonstrates the ability to critically evaluate concepts and theory and has an element of novelty and originality. There is clear evidence of a significant amount of reading beyond that required for the course. 93-100: A; 90-92.99: A-
BThis is highly competent level of performance and directly addresses the question or problem raised.There is a demonstration of some ability to critically evaluatetheory and concepts and relate them to practice. Discussions reflect the student’s own arguments and are not simply a repetition of standard lecture andreference material. The work does not suffer from any major errors or omissions and provides evidence of reading beyond the required assignments. 86-89.99: B+ 83-85.99: B 80-82.99: B-
CThis is an acceptable level of performance and provides answers that are clear but limited, reflecting the information offered in the lectures and reference readings. 75-79.99: C+ 70-74.99: C 65-69.99: C-
DThis level of performances demonstrates that the student lacks a coherent grasp of the material.Important information is omitted and irrelevant points included.In effect, the student has barely done enough to persuade the instructor that s/he should not fail. 60-64.99: D+ 55-59.99: D 50-54.99: D-
Fhis work fails to show any knowledge or understanding of the issues raised in the question. Most of the material in the answer is irrelevant. Below 50: F

-ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS:

Class attendance: crucial, since consulting topics and client work will be done in class.
An 80% participation rate is mandatory. After 6 unexcused absences, the student will be unable to participate in the final project, losing all the points assigned to it.

In case of an unexcused absence on the day of a graded assignment, the student will lose all the points of the assignment, unless absence is excused through a petition to the Dean's Office prior to the assessment day. The Dean’s Office will grant such permission only when the absence was caused by a serious impediment, such as a documented illness, hospitalization or death in the immediate family (in which you must attend the funeral) or other situations of similar gravity. Absences due to other meaningful conflicts, such as job interviews, family celebrations, travel difficulties, student misunderstandings or personal convenience, will not be excused. Students who will be absent from a major exam must notify the Dean’s Office prior to that exam. Absences from class due to the observance of a religious holiday will normally be excused. Individual students who will have to miss class to observe a religious holiday should notify the instructor by the end of the Add/Drop period to make prior arrangements for making up any work that will be missed. 

Any other absence during the course will not be excused, regardless the reason.

ACADEMIC HONESTY
As stated in the university catalog, any student who commits an act of academic dishonesty will receive a failing grade on the work in which the dishonesty occurred. In addition, acts of academic dishonesty, irrespective of the weight of the assignment, may result in the student receiving a failing grade in the course. Instances of academic dishonesty will be reported to the Dean of Academic Affairs. A student who is reported twice for academic dishonesty is subject to summary dismissal from the University. In such a case, the Academic Council will then make a recommendation to the President, who will make the final decision.
STUDENTS WITH LEARNING OR OTHER DISABILITIES
John Cabot University does not discriminate on the basis of disability or handicap. Students with approved accommodations must inform their professors at the beginning of the term. Please see the website for the complete policy.

SCHEDULE

Course Schedule (14 Weeks)

(Subject to adjustments based on client availability and project needs)


Phase 1 – Intro to the course and problem definition (Weeks 1–3)

Introduction to the course and to the marketing consulting mindset; differences between academic and consulting problem solving; structured problem definition, issue structuring, prioritization, and backward logic.
During this phase, the client presents the business challenge, strategic tensions, and expectations.


Phase 2 – Client interviewing and project focus (Weeks 4–6)

Development of interview guides; refinement of issue trees and priorities; translation of priorities into key client questions; synthesis of interview takeaways to clarify project focus.
During this phase, students conduct structured interviews with the client.


Phase 3 – Focused analyses and synthesis (Weeks 7–10)

Design and execution of focused analyses aligned with prioritized issues; selective use of marketing frameworks; interpretation of findings; synthesis of results into a coherent view of the problem and emerging recommendations.
During this phase, draft recommendations are discussed with the client for feedback on direction and relevance.


Phase 4 – Recommendations and executive communication (Weeks 11–14)

Synthesis of findings into clear, decision-oriented recommendations; introduction to executive-style communication, including pyramid logic, storylining, and action titles; preparation and delivery of a final executive presentation.
The course concludes with final presentations to the client and feedback.