JCU Logo

JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY

COURSE CODE: "HS 260"
COURSE NAME: "Early Modern Europe: Absolutism and Revolutions"
SEMESTER & YEAR: Spring 2025
SYLLABUS

INSTRUCTOR: Gene Ogle
EMAIL: [email protected]
HOURS: TTH 3:00 PM 4:15 PM
TOTAL NO. OF CONTACT HOURS: 45
CREDITS:
PREREQUISITES:
OFFICE HOURS: Tuesday and Thursday 9-9:45 a.m. and By Appointment

COURSE DESCRIPTION:
This course provides a survey of the basic events and developments in European history, from the Wars of Religion of the late 16th and early 17th centuries through the Napoleonic era. The focus is primarily on the political, cultural, social, and economic developments that laid the foundations of European modernity.

Satisfies "Early Modern History" core course requirement for History majors.
SUMMARY OF COURSE CONTENT:

In this course, we will explore the transformations that laid the foundations of European modernity between c. 1500 and c. 1800.  In this era, violent religious conflict forced Europeans to seek new ways of establishing political, social, and cultural order, daily life was transformed by the gradual development of capitalism and more powerful states, and Europeans engaged more fully with the non-European world than ever before.  All of these changes significantly modified the ways in which Europeans understood themselves and the worlds in which they lived.  We will explore these topics by examining the ways in which historians have attempted to recover the lost worlds of early modern Europe and analyzing sources from those worlds.  

The course is run as a discussion seminar in which we will collectively examine and explore the course readings.  Your regular preparation and active participation are essential to making the course work well.

 

A Note on How We Should Approach this Semester


Most generally, I am committed to the principle that my aims as an undergraduate history instructor should be to push (and to help) you to develop the skills, capacities, and modes of interpretation and understanding that will allow you to engage critically with the human past, the traces it has left, the ever-renewing knowledge we have of it, and its meanings for our present.  My role is that of a ‘coach,’ not a performer playing a show or a talking head telling you what’s what (although sometimes I will suggest my understandings of that too).  With this approach, you will without doubt learn more and develop abilities that are useful in other settings more fully than if I simply lectured and asked you to repeat that material on exams, and you will likely find what we do more interesting too. However, for this approach to work, we all need to commit ourselves to meeting the following expectations:

1. Do the course reading (and especially the discussion reading) on a timely basis. You absolutely must complete it before the class in which we are discussing it and (if relevant) the deadline for making a related forum post (if you can finish it even earlier and thus have a bit more time to think about it, that’s even better).  At times this course will involve a significant amount of out-of-class reading.  I know that this may be a challenge for some of you, but we collectively need an ample amount of solid material to work with to make our discussions meaningful.  Also, do know that with practice you will develop your abilities to deal with larger amounts of reading in limited time frames.  If you wish, we can talk more about how to do the reading and the kinds of things you should be looking for in doing it in class.

2. When and if relevant, respect deadlines for discussion forum posts, and whenever possible post (and respond to classmates’ posts) sooner rather than later.  While these posts do count towards your participation grade, they are not ‘homework’ that you should do to show me that you are doing the work.  Rather, they are opportunities for you to develop, share, and debate your thoughts and questions about the reading and other course material with one another.  We have to meet deadlines to give that interaction space to happen.

3. When you are present, be present.  We should make the most of the 2 ½ hours we meet each week to engage with the course materials and learn together.  During that time, we should all be focused on that effort and not other things such as checking social media, catching up on e-mail, studying for other courses or whatever else may distract us from the matters at hand.  Doing otherwise is disrespectful to the other members of the class, including me.  As such, if you really, really need to be doing something else, just don’t come to class.

4. Maintain a respectful, professional tone in your responses and posts, but don’t be afraid to experiment with ideas and interpretations out of fear that they may be controversial (just work on clearly expressing your reasoning).  On this note, I think our discussions will function best if we all work on the assumption that each of us is openly and forthrightly attempting to grapple with the complexities and ambiguities of our shared human past and its relationship to our present (and as such that the things we say and write are never intended to harm or to insult).  Engaging with that past often forces us to look at the many horrid and ugly things that humans have done to and thought about (and continue to do to and think about) one another, which can be a difficult and painful experience.  Frank and open discussion is the best way both to seek to understand that past and to forge civil and tolerant ways of interacting and living with it and one another in the present.

5. Give credit where credit is due and be sure that all work you hand in is your own.  Not only does plagiarism, unauthorized use of Artificial Intelligence, or any other form of cheating defeat the whole purpose of going to university to learn and to improve one’s abilities, it undermines the basic trust any community needs to learn and work together. 

6. Try not to be too nervous about grades.  We learn through practice, we all fall short of our aims sometimes, and we sometimes learn more from falling short than anything else.  I purposefully keep many assignments fairly open in terms of the types of topics and arguments you may develop to give you the freedom to present your ideas and sharpen your abilities, and such freedom always entails risks.  Know that I put mechanisms in place to weigh the improvement that you make over the course into the calculation of your final course grade.

7. Keep lines of communication open.  Please know that the ways in which I structure classroom sessions and on-line discussion activities in this syllabus remain experimental and may change.  Please share your thoughts on them and feel free to suggest approaches, ways of organizing discussions (in-person or on-line), or other activities that you believe may help you and your classmates to better engage with the course material.  I cannot neglect my responsibility to set the rules for the game that is our course in ways that I believe best assure both academic rigor and fairness across the class, but you can be assured that I will value and carefully consider any suggestions you may make. More generally, if you have questions or concerns regarding any matters relating to the course, please do feel free to share them with me. 

 

 
LEARNING OUTCOMES:
You should develop an understanding of key developments and phenomena in early modern European history. You should also cultivate an awareness of the varied experiences of different groups of early modern Europeans as well as the approaches historians and other scholars have developed to analyze and reconstruct their history. You should develop your capacity to critically analyze a range of source materials. You should also improve your ability to effectively communicate your ideas orally and in writing.
 
 
TEXTBOOK:
Book TitleAuthorPublisherISBN numberLibrary Call NumberCommentsFormatLocal BookstoreOnline Purchase
Early Modern European Society, 3rd ed.Henry KamenYale University Press9780300262506   Almost Corner Bookshop 
REQUIRED RESERVED READING:
NONE

RECOMMENDED RESERVED READING:
NONE
GRADING POLICY
-ASSESSMENT METHODS:
AssignmentGuidelinesWeight
3 Reaction Papers (1 1/2 to 2 double-spaced pages/350-500 words each)In each of the reaction papers (see the course schedule for due dates), you will develop a brief but coherent and well-supported argument regarding the discussion readings for the day on which the paper is due. In these papers, you should not summarize the reading, but rather develop a main thought of your own building on those readings. Ways of developing such arguments include, but are not limited to: critiquing some part of the argument of a secondary source, testing some part of the argument of a secondary source through the analysis of a primary source, comparing and contrasting different readings, or developing a point made by one of the authors more fully and in doing so explaining more of what it may tell us about the subject under discussion. Your grade for these reaction papers will be determined by the strength and focus of your analysis, the persuasiveness of your argument (including quality of writing), and the originality of your thought. For further guidance, see the guidelines posted on the course Moodle page.20%
ParticipationYour regular participation in our class discussions will be key to making this course work, and by actively participating not only will you learn more, you’ll develop useful communicative skills and likely find course material to be more interesting. Participation also counts for a significant portion of your final course grade, and it is the only component of that final course grade in which simple effort and regular activity translate directly into a high grade. What do you need to do for this? Primarily do the discussion readings on time, be ready to talk about them, and engage regularly and actively in some combination of our in-class discussions and the Moodle discussion forums for the course. In addition, you should bring a question or observation to each class session about the day’s readings that you believe would provide a good starting point for a discussion of those readings. Frequently, I will begin the discussion portion of class by asking several of you to share these questions/observations with the rest of class. Please note that behaving in ways that create distractions for other members of the class (including the professor) will lower your participation grade. Such behavior includes, but is not limited to: messaging, checking social media, catching up on e-mail, watching on-line videos, reading non-class related materials, studying for other courses, shopping on-line, and generally any activity that detracts from your or any other classmate's full participation in what we are doing in the classroom.15%
Midterm ExamThe midterm exam will be composed of two essay questions I will give you the week before the exam. You will answer one of those questions. You may make use of two double-sided pages of notes during the exam, provided that you submit them for my review before starting the exam. Your grade on the exam will depend upon the analytical strength and persuasiveness of your arguments, your capacity to discuss the material we cover in the course to date (including level of mastery of course readings), and the factual accuracy of your answers. Remember that what you are being tested on is your ability to develop and present a strong, well-supported argument building on the course materials, not simply provide a 'correct' answer to the question you choose.25%
Final ExamThe final exam will be composed of two essay questions I will give you the week before the exam. You will answer one of those questions. You may make use of two double-sided pages of notes during the exam, provided that you submit them for my review before starting the exam. Your grade on the exam will depend upon the analytical strength and persuasiveness of your arguments, your capacity to discuss the material we cover in the course as a whole (including level of mastery of course readings), and the factual accuracy of your answers. Remember that what you are being tested on is your ability to develop and present a strong, well-supported argument building on the course materials, not simply provide a 'correct' answer to the question you choose.30%
Article/Book Chapter Review and Presentation (2-3 double spaced pages/500-750 words)In the article/book chapter review you will prepare an analytical review of an academic journal article or book chapter of your choice from a list of possibilities provided by me. In addition, you will make a brief presentation (c. 10-15 minutes) to the rest of the class on the day in which we are discussing readings that are related to the subject of your chapter/article. This presentation should include a brief summary of the article/chapter, your analysis of it, and reflections on how it relates to the other readings for the day in question. Your grade will be determined by the strength of your analysis, the persuasiveness of your argument (including quality of writing), and the originality of your thought.10%

-ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
AWork of this quality directly addresses the question or problem raised and provides a coherent argument displaying an extensive knowledge of relevant information or content. This type of work demonstrates the ability to critically evaluate concepts and theory and has an element of novelty and originality. There is clear evidence of a significant, thorough, and insightful engagement with the course reading and other materials.
BThis is a highly competent level of performance and directly addresses the question or problem raised. There is a demonstration of some ability to critically evaluate theory and concepts and relate them to practice. Discussions reflect the student’s own arguments and are not simply a repetition of standard lecture and reference material. The work does not suffer from any major errors or omissions and provides evidence of significant engagement with the course reading and other materials.
CThis is an acceptable level of performance and provides answers that are clear but limited, reflecting the information offered in the lectures and reference readings.
DThis level of performance demonstrates that the student lacks a coherent grasp of the material. Important information is omitted and irrelevant points included. In effect, the student has barely done enough to persuade the instructor that s/he should not fail.
FThis work fails to show any knowledge or understanding of the issues raised in the question. Most of the material in the answer is irrelevant.

-ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS:
See above on participation.  To participate regularly, you have to be present regularly.
ACADEMIC HONESTY
As stated in the university catalog, any student who commits an act of academic dishonesty will receive a failing grade on the work in which the dishonesty occurred. In addition, acts of academic dishonesty, irrespective of the weight of the assignment, may result in the student receiving a failing grade in the course. Instances of academic dishonesty will be reported to the Dean of Academic Affairs. A student who is reported twice for academic dishonesty is subject to summary dismissal from the University. In such a case, the Academic Council will then make a recommendation to the President, who will make the final decision.
STUDENTS WITH LEARNING OR OTHER DISABILITIES
John Cabot University does not discriminate on the basis of disability or handicap. Students with approved accommodations must inform their professors at the beginning of the term. Please see the website for the complete policy.

SCHEDULE

Course Readings

The book should be available at the Almost Corner Bookshop (Via del Moro, 45) or directly from the publishers' website in eBook form.  All course readings provide the basis for our classroom and on-line discussions. You must read and think about those assigned for a particular class period and/or the deadline for making a related forum post.  Otherwise, you will be unable to participate adequately and your participation grade will suffer. You should also bring this material to class on the days that we are discussing it.

Important Course Policies

All assignments should be handed in as hard copies in class and electronically through the Moodle portal for the assignment--I encourage you to double-check on the Moodle to be sure that work has been submitted after you believe you have done so.  If for some reason it is not working, send them to me as e-mail attachments. 

All late work will suffer a grade penalty. No late work will be accepted following the final examination.

Any documented case of academic dishonesty on any assignment will result in a failing grade for the assignment in question and may also result in a failing grade for the course as a whole, regardless of the assignment's weight in terms of the final course grade. Please remember that, as the University's policy states, "Plagiarism can be deliberate or negligent; students are responsible for ensuring that any work submitted with their name on it is properly referenced."  If you have questions about how to cite material properly, refer to the appropriate sections of the MLA Style Manual or Chicago Manual of Style--if you have questions as to whether particular pieces of material should be cited, ask me. Note that submitting work that you have previously submitted (or plan to submit) for credit in another course is also a form of academic dishonesty, unless you obtain explicit approval from both instructors to do so. For this course, no such double submission is allowed. Please note that your papers are to be submitted to turnitin.com to check their content for plagiarism.  I am setting up the turintin submission options so that you can see the similarity reports the service generates and resubmit your papers up until the due date.

Academic Honesty Policy—Generative Artificial Intelligence Update

The University’s Academic Integrity policies were recently updated to include “[t]he unauthorized use of generative AI” as one of the forms that academic dishonesty can take.  In light of this change, here are the policies for this course regarding generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT). The use of generative AI for the direct composition of course assignments (e.g., papers and exam essays) is not permitted.  Simply put, your papers and essays should not include text generated by Artificial Intelligence unless that text is placed in quotation marks and identified as such.  Any papers handed in that appear to contain unauthorized AI generated text (as detected by detection software or otherwise) will not receive a grade and cannot be used to fulfill course requirements.  As the detection software can produce 'false positives,' in such cases you will be allowed to write an additional reaction paper or revised draft to fulfill those requirements.  Depending on the specifics of the individual cases, a late penalty may be applied to additional papers handed in for these reasons.

Other uses of AI (e.g., as “idea generators,” bibliographic or source-finding assistants, etc.) are discouraged as they may limit the fuller development of the skills, capacities, and habits of mind that constitute some of the primary aims and benefits of university education, but do not necessarily fall into the category of “unauthorized use.”  If you do use generative AI in any of these or other manners, however, you must identify that you have done so explicitly in the paper or exam essay in question. 

Similarly, I strongly discourage you from using advanced grammar and style correctors (e.g., Grammarly).  While I will regularly note errors in terms of style, grammar, and so forth in your writing, my doing so does not significantly affect the grade you receive for assignments so long as your thought, the general arrangement of your argument, and your points are clear (and you push yourself to improve over time).  Using AI-based correction software can prevent you from receiving such feedback and as such keep you from being able to develop your writing skills.  In the case that you do still make use of such software, you must explicitly identify that you did so and hand in a copy of what you wrote before having the software "fix" it.  If you do not do this and either the University's detection software or my reading of the piece suggests a likelihood that it was produced by generative AI, the work will not be counted towards completing course requirements (see above).

 
Office Hours, Scheduling Appointments, E-mail Guidance, and So Forth

My drop-in office hours are on Tuesdays and Thursdays from 9 to 9:45 a.m..  I am also available by appointment--to set one up, simply e-mail me or ask me just after class.  My office is on the Frohring/ex-Tiber Roof.

Please know that I do not normally respond to e-mails during the weekend or after 6:30 p.m. (but feel free to write me whenever you wish--I'll respond as soon as I can the next week or the next day).  We all need to set aside time to work on other things, disconnect, recharge, and 'stay human.'  I encourage you to do the same in ways that work with your schedule and try to do what I can to provide you with as much flexibility as possible in structuring out-of-class activities.

On-line Moodle Discussion Forum

“Reflecting on the Week, Continuing our Classroom Discussion” Forum: For this weekly forum, I will post 1-2 discussion questions or prompts based on the week's discussion readings and the material I anticipate us discussing in class.  These prompts/questions usually push us to think about how the varied material we discuss fits together into larger pictures and themes.  As such, participating in this forum is also useful for making such connections yourselves, and through that preparing for the course exams.  Feel free to post as much as you like.  There is no required length for your posts (if you likely need a few sentences to make your point clearly and effectively).  This weekly forum closes on Monday the following week. (Maximum expected time per week, not including the time needed to do the reading: 15-30 minutes)

 

Course Schedule (Please note that the following is subject to change--any updates will be made directly to the course Moodle page.)

Part One: Foundations

1/21  Introductions:  What is Europe?  Early Modern? 

1/23  What is Early Modern?--Historians' Responses and Questions (Wiesner-Hanks, What is Early Modern History? (Excerpts); TBA)

 

1/28 Looking Out, Looking In--Identities and Horizons (Kamen, Ch. 1 (1-49); Possible Due Date--Reaction Paper 1)

1/30 Filling the Days--Work, Daily Life and Moving (Kamen, Ch. 2 (50-69); TBA; Possible Due Date--Reaction Paper 1)

 

2/4 Challenging Beliefs--Community, Ritual, and Religious Change (Kamen, Ch. 3 (70-102); TBA; Possible Due Date--Reaction Paper 1)

2/6 Power and Wealth--The Aristocracy (Kamen, Ch. 4 (103-135); TBA; Possible Due Date--Reaction Paper 1)

 

2/11 Powerful Commoners--The Middling Elites (Kamen, Ch. 5 (136-162); TBA; Last Possible Due Date--Reaction Paper 1)

2/13 Hard Times and Revolts--Plebiean Life in Town and Country (Kamen, Ch. 6 (163-207); TBA; Possible Due Date--Reaction Paper 2)

 

2/18 Power in the Family--Gender Roles and Gendered Experiences (Kamen, Ch. 7 (208-238); TBA; Possible Due Date--Reaction Paper 2)

2/20 Crime, Madness, and Punishment--Discipline and Marginality (Kamen, Ch. 8 (239-276); TBA; Possible Due Date--Reaction Paper 2)

 

2/25 A New Public and Private?--Individuals and Society (Kamen, Ch. 9 (277-316); TBA; Possible Due Date--Reaction Paper 2)

2/27 Into a Wider World--Early Modern Globalization and Its Effects in Europe (Kamen, Ch. 10 (317-343); TBA; Possible Due Date--Reaction Paper 2)

2/28 UNIVERSITY MAKE-UP DAY (FRIDAY) The Rise of the State?--Centralization and Its Limits (Kamen, Ch. 11 (344-361); TBA; Last Possible Due Date--Reaction Paper 2)

 

3/4 Midterm Exam

3/6 TBA

 

3/11 and 3/13 SPRING BREAK

 

Part Two: Explorations

3/18-4/29 TBA--We will determine the particular themes, events, developments, and questions that we will explore more fully (and as such the readings we will discuss) through consultation during the first half of the semester.  Updates will be made directly to the course Moodle page.  The last possible due date for Reaction Paper 3 will be the last day of class (4/29).

 

Final Exam Date TBA (Final Exams Week is from 5/5 to 5/9)