JCU Logo

JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY

COURSE CODE: "PL 352"
COURSE NAME: "Politics of South-East Asia"
SEMESTER & YEAR: Fall 2024
SYLLABUS

INSTRUCTOR: Pietro Paolo Masina
EMAIL: [email protected]
HOURS: TTH 4:30 PM 5:45 PM
TOTAL NO. OF CONTACT HOURS: 45
CREDITS: 3
PREREQUISITES: Prerequisite: Junior Standing
OFFICE HOURS:

COURSE DESCRIPTION:
Southeast Asia is a region of over 620 million people, with some of the most dynamic economies in the world. This course examines contemporary politics in Southeast Asia, with a focus on events since 1970. The course begins by reviewing the impact of colonialism and historical trajectories on contemporary politics. We then move to focus on the eleven specific countries in the region, tracing key political events, outlining the impact of leaders, reviewing the patterns of political contestation and providing a foundation of the structure of governments. In the final part of the course we focus on specific issues and challenges, including the role of leaders, dynamics within political institutions, development, civil society, conflict and human rights, ASEAN, foreign policy and regional security. This course provides a valuable foundation for understanding Southeast Asia and is recommended for any student interested in learning about the region.
SUMMARY OF COURSE CONTENT:

The course introduces the contemporary history and politics of Southeast Asia, a large region with a population of over 600 million. The main focus will be on economic development and societal change. It begins by examining the state-formation process, highlighting the challenges resulting from colonial legacies and the competing projects promoted by different actors. It will then explore key events of the Cold War period, which continue to impact society today. Next, the course will focus on economic development, examining the integration of different countries into regional and global production systems. A major regional economic crisis in 1997-98 halted the dream that Southeast Asian countries could replicate the so-called economic miracle of Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore. Attention will then turn to the quality of economic growth in the region, also exploring the lives of the poor and vulnerable. As the region became a major manufacturing hub for garments and electronics, this also led to an increase in the number of industrial workers, with characteristics quite different from the rise of an industrial proletariat in the West. The crisis in development projects triggered by the 1997/98 financial crisis also produced a major political impasse that remains unresolved in countries like Thailand and Malaysia. While Southeast Asia appeared to be advancing towards democratization in the 1990s, populism and authoritarianism have substantially prevailed over the following two decades. Finally, the course will examine the new centrality of Southeast Asia in the context of the “new Cold War” between China and the United States in the South China Sea.

 

LEARNING OUTCOMES:

By the end of this course, students will be able to:

* Understand Political Issues in Southeast Asia

* Appreciate Southeast Asia’s Political Diversity2

* Research Contemporary Southeast Asian Political Issues

* Frame Problems from Multiple Perspectives

* Recognize the Range and Breadth of Regional Political Challenges

* Evaluate Societal and State Political Engagement in Southeast Asia

* Formulate their Own Views on Southeast Asian Politics

* Compare Experiences in Southeast Asia with that of their own Countries/Region

TEXTBOOK:
NONE
REQUIRED RESERVED READING:
NONE

RECOMMENDED RESERVED READING:
NONE
GRADING POLICY
-ASSESSMENT METHODS:
AssignmentGuidelinesWeight
Active classwork participation Read the suggested literature before the lesson. Participate in classwork by asking questions and contributing answers15
Presentations in classFor the mid-term exam, students will be required to make a PowerPoint presentation—either in groups or individually—based on some of the literature indicated in the reading list (typically two or three articles, as agreed upon with the lecturer). The presentations will last approximately 30 minutes. 30
Final examAt the end of the course, students will write a review essay of about 4,000 words, following the instructions given during the course. The essay should refer to at least four of the articles discussed in class, along with any other sources the students consider relevant. This essay will then be presented at the final exam. Students may choose to prepare a PowerPoint presentation for their essay, with a talk lasting about 15 minutes.65

-ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
AWork of this quality directly addresses the question or problem raised and provides a coherent argument displaying an extensive knowledge of relevant information or content. This type of work demonstrates the ability to critically evaluate concepts and theory and has an element of novelty and originality. There is clear evidence of a significant amount of reading beyond that required for the course.
BThis is highly competent level of performance and directly addresses the question or problem raised.There is a demonstration of some ability to critically evaluatetheory and concepts and relate them to practice. Discussions reflect the student’s own arguments and are not simply a repetition of standard lecture andreference material. The work does not suffer from any major errors or omissions and provides evidence of reading beyond the required assignments.
CThis is an acceptable level of performance and provides answers that are clear but limited, reflecting the information offered in the lectures and reference readings.
DThis level of performances demonstrates that the student lacks a coherent grasp of the material.Important information is omitted and irrelevant points included.In effect, the student has barely done enough to persuade the instructor that s/he should not fail.
FThis work fails to show any knowledge or understanding of the issues raised in the question. Most of the material in the answer is irrelevant.

-ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS:

Absences should be rare and reserved for unforeseen circumstances. You cannot make up a midterm or final without the permission of the Dean’s Office. The Associate Dean’s office should not be involved in correspondence regarding any other type of routine absence. This means that if you need to return home for a funeral, if you need to go to the dentist, if you have a fingerprinting appointment, if you are ill, or for any other reason that I have not listed, you simply do not come to class that day and you contact a colleague to find out what went on in class. Let us all agree that if you need to be absent, I believe you and I trust that you will find out what you missed from a colleague. Let’s create a world in which we believe each other and trust that we would be in class every session if we could. Let us focus on building skills of direct student-professor communication rather than asking others to intervene on routine absence matters on our behalf.  It should go without saying that frequent absences will mean you are less prepared to meet the learning objectives of the course. Thus, your grade will suffer because, simply put, you are unfamiliar with what we have done in class. At the 5th absence, you will be asked to withdraw from the course. 

There are always one or two obvious common sense extreme exceptions to this aspiration, but generally it is best to avoid triggering institutional responses for routine short-term absences. The bottom line is that every student, including you, is a treasured resource for each class. We need you as much as you need us. Without you, it's just not the same.

ACADEMIC HONESTY
As stated in the university catalog, any student who commits an act of academic dishonesty will receive a failing grade on the work in which the dishonesty occurred. In addition, acts of academic dishonesty, irrespective of the weight of the assignment, may result in the student receiving a failing grade in the course. Instances of academic dishonesty will be reported to the Dean of Academic Affairs. A student who is reported twice for academic dishonesty is subject to summary dismissal from the University. In such a case, the Academic Council will then make a recommendation to the President, who will make the final decision.
STUDENTS WITH LEARNING OR OTHER DISABILITIES
John Cabot University does not discriminate on the basis of disability or handicap. Students with approved accommodations must inform their professors at the beginning of the term. Please see the website for the complete policy.

SCHEDULE

Week 1 – Introduction to the region

Readings:

Antony Reid (215) “People in the Humid Tropics”, A History of Southeast Asia: Critical Crossroads. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.

Robert Dayley (2024) “Introduction: Southeast Asia Political Economy”, Southeast Asia in the New International Era.9th Edition. Boulder, Co: Westview Press,  pp. 1-26.

 

Week 2 – Colonial legacy

Norman G. Owen (ed.) (2005) “Part 4: Passages out of the Colonial Era”, The Emergence of Modern Southeast Asia: A New History. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, pp. 283-378.

 

Week 3  – Independence and national forces I

James R. Rush (2018) “Chapter 4: Nations”, Southeast Asia: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford. Oxford University Press,pp. 102-129.  

Vincent Houben (2003) “Southeast Asia and Islam,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences,July, pp. 149-170.

 

 Week 4 – Independence and national forces II

James R. Rush (2018) “Chapter 5: The past in the present”, Southeast Asia: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford. Oxford University Press, pp. 130-154.  

Benedict Anderson (1990) “The Idea of Power in Javanese: Its Setting and Development,” in Language and Power: Exploring Political Cultures in Indonesia. Itaha. Cornell University Press, pp. 17-77

 

Week 5 – The Cold War in Southeast Asia

Fredrik Logevall (2010) “The Indochina wars and the Cold War”, in Melvyn P. Leffler, Odd Arne Westad, The Cambridge History Of The Cold War, Vol. II Crises and Détente. Cambridge:  Cambridge University Press, pp. 281-304.

Robert Cribb (2001) “Genocide in Indonesia, 1965‐1966”, Journal of Genocide Research, 3(2), pp. 219-239, 

 

Week 6 – Economic development 

Toby Carroll (2020) “The Political Economy of Southeast Asia’s Development from Independence to Hyperglobalisation”, in Toby Carroll, Shahar Hameiri and Lee Jones (eds), The Political Economy of Southeast Asia.  Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.35-84.

Richard Doner (2012) “Politics, institutions and performance: explaining growth
variation in East Asia”, Richard Robison (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Politics. Oxon and New York: Routledge, pp. 151-173.

 

Week 7 – Politics and society

Vedi R. Hadiz (2012) “Democracy and money politics: the case of Indonesia”, Richard Robison (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Politics. Oxon and New York: Routledge, pp. 71-82.

Pasuk Phongpaichit and Chris Baker (2012)  “Populist challenge to the establishment: Thaksin Shinawatra and the transformation of Thai politics”, Richard Robison (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Politics. Oxon and New York: Routledge, pp. 83-96.

Lee Jones (2012) “State power, social conflicts and security policy in Southeast Asia”,  “Populist challenge to the establishment: Thaksin Shinawatra and the transformation of Thai politics”, Richard Robison (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Politics. Oxon and New York: Routledge, pp. 346-360.

 

Week 8 – Politics and society II

Kevin Hewison, Garry Rodan (2012) “Southeast Asia: The Left and the rise of bourgeois opposition”, Richard Robison (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Politics. Oxon and New York: Routledge, pp. 25-39.

Jeffrey A. Winters (2012) “Oligarchs and oligarchy in Southeast Asia”, Richard Robison (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Politics. Oxon and New York: Routledge, pp. 53-67.

Martin Gainsborough (2012) “Vietnam: the ruling Communist Party and the incubation of
‘new’ political forces”, Richard Robison (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Politics. Oxon and New York: Routledge, pp. 135-148.

 

Week 9 – Development for whom? Poverty and exclusion

Jonathan Rigg (2016) “Chapters 3,4, and 5”, Challenging Southeast Asian Development. London: Routledge, 2016.

 

Week 10 – Industry and labor

Jane Hutchison (2012) “Labour politics in Southeast Asia: the Philippines in comparative perspective”, Richard Robison (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Politics. Oxon and New York: Routledge, pp. 40-52.

Pietro Masina, Michela Cerimele (2018) “Patterns of Industrialisation and the State of Industrial Labour in Post-WTO-Accession Vietnam”, European Journal of East Asian Studies,  17 (2), pp. 289-323.

 

Week 11 – State, region and the global

Michele Ford (2012) “Contested borders, contested boundaries: the politics of labour
migration in Southeast Asia”, Richard Robison (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Politics. Oxon and New York: Routledge, pp. 305-314.

Helen E.S. Nesadurai (2012) “Trade policy in Southeast Asia: politics, domestic interests and the forging of new accommodations in the regional and global economy”, Richard Robison (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Politics. Oxon and New York: Routledge, pp. 315-329.

 

Week 12 – Group presentations

 

Week 13 – Southeast Asia in the new Cold War

David Shambaugh (2018) “U.S.-China Rivalry in Southeast Asia”, International Security, 42(4), pp. 85-127 

Drew Thompson (2024) Don’t Make Us Choose Sides: Southeast Asian Perspectives of U.S. Strategy and Presence in the Region, Centre on Asia and Globalisation, Lee Kwan Yew School of Public Policy, March, pp. 1-21.

 

Week 14 – Final review