|
|
JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY
COURSE CODE: "EN 388"
COURSE NAME: "Literature and Digital Humanities: Creating the Frankenstein Project"
SEMESTER & YEAR:
Fall 2024
|
SYLLABUS
INSTRUCTOR:
Alessandra Grego
EMAIL: [email protected]
HOURS:
TTH 1:30 PM 2:45 PM
TOTAL NO. OF CONTACT HOURS:
45
CREDITS:
3
PREREQUISITES:
Prerequisite: EN 110 with a grade of C or above.
OFFICE HOURS:
by appointment
|
|
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
This course serves as an introduction to the growing field and practice of digital humanities in literature, with a focus on the transformative role of digital technologies in how we experience the stories of humankind – and, in turn, the important role of language arts in humanizing technology. It provides history and context for the emergence of a field as wide-reaching as it is vibrant, incorporating inter- and multi-disciplinary study, and ranging from the theoretically and technologically complex to easily accessible forms of narrative incorporating everyday digital interactions. Within this setting, students will contribute to and learn about what is involved in publishing their own text-based digital humanities collaboration, using open source production methods to create a class showcase project.This is a reading and writing intensive course. Students in 300-level literature classes are required to produce 5-6,000 words of critical writing.
|
SUMMARY OF COURSE CONTENT:
In this course students will experiment with various digital tools to take apart - or hack - Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. "The digital humanities has made hacking a discipline. “Hacking” these days means to adapt, manipulate, and make productive use out of a given technology or technological context or platform" (Fyfe 3). Students will be encouraged to approach the text in new ways, through distant reading, through databases, by exploring existing digital projects, creating maps and analysing sentiments. We will experiment with text annotation and build a hypertext to help us obeserve the novel as it is woven out of multiple narrative strands drawn from other fictional texts, from poetry, from history, from science, from philosophy, from mythology. Finally we will build a map of the influence of Frankenstein on successive literature, film, figurative art, music, and beyond. The various experiments with digital tools built by the students in this class will be curated in a digital exhibition built in Omeka.
Paul Fyfe, “Digital Humanities Unplugged,” Digital Humanities Quarterly 5, no. 3 (2011), http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/5/3/000106/000106.html.
|
LEARNING OUTCOMES:
Students will learn how to use digital tools to interrogate a literary text.
They will exit the course with
- Advanced close reading and critical skills
- in depth knowledge of Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein, its literary influences, context, and impact and of the critical skills required for the study of fiction.
- a theoretical understanding of the uses and challenges of a digital approach to literature and humanities
- the ability to employ digital tools for literary research (e.g. textual annotation, mapping, database construction, metadata description)
- the skills to critically assess and evaluate the results of the research performed and write a shareable report of the findings.
the experience of curating a digital exhibition of findings produced in the class
|
TEXTBOOK:
Book Title | Author | Publisher | ISBN number | Library Call Number | Comments | Format | Local Bookstore | Online Purchase |
Electronic Literature As Digital Humanities: Contexts, Forms, and Practices | Dene Grigar and James O'Sullivan (eds.) | Bloomsbury Academic, 2021. | 9781501363504 | | ebook available from Frohring Library | Ebook | | |
Information and Knowledge Organisation in Digital Humanities : Global Perspectives. | Golub, Koraljka, and Ying-Hsang Liu, editors. | First edition., Routledge, 2021. | ISBN 9780367675684 | | ebook available from the Frohring LIbrary | Ebook | | |
Introduction to Digital Humanities : Enhancing Scholarship with the Use of Technology | Wymer, Kathryn C. | . Routledge, 202 | ISBN 9780367711153 | | available from the Frohring library | Ebook | | |
|
REQUIRED RESERVED READING:
RECOMMENDED RESERVED READING:
|
GRADING POLICY
-ASSESSMENT METHODS:
Assignment | Guidelines | Weight |
1st Home Paper | Traditional Research Paper on 'Frankenstein' - 2500 words | 25% |
2nd home paper | Resarch Findings report on the digital humanities project on 'Frankenstein' | 25% |
Omeka exhibition | Curation of digital exhibition of findings. | 25% |
Focused exercises | Weekly forums and exercises on the uses of specific tools | 25% |
-ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
AWork of this quality directly addresses the question or problem raised and provides a coherent argument displaying an extensive knowledge of relevant information or content. This type of work demonstrates the ability to critically evaluate concepts and theory and has an element of novelty and originality. There is clear evidence of a significant amount of reading beyond that required for the course. BThis is highly competent level of performance and directly addresses the question or problem raised.There is a demonstration of some ability to critically evaluatetheory and concepts and relate them to practice. Discussions reflect the student’s own arguments and are not simply a repetition of standard lecture andreference material. The work does not suffer from any major errors or omissions and provides evidence of reading beyond the required assignments. CThis is an acceptable level of performance and provides answers that are clear but limited, reflecting the information offered in the lectures and reference readings. DThis level of performances demonstrates that the student lacks a coherent grasp of the material.Important information is omitted and irrelevant points included.In effect, the student has barely done enough to persuade the instructor that s/he should not fail. FThis work fails to show any knowledge or understanding of the issues raised in the question. Most of the material in the answer is irrelevant.
-ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS:
ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS AND EXAMINATION POLICY
Students are allowed a total of four absences per term, whether they are excused or not, barring very serious emergencies. Students are asked NOT to provide justification and to take responsibility for attendance.
More than four absences, whether excused or not, will result in a grade drop (e.g. from A to A-) per absence.
You cannot make-up a major exam (midterm or final) without the permission of the Dean’s Office. The Dean’s Office will grant such permission only when the absence was caused by a serious impediment, such as a documented illness, hospitalization or death in the immediate family (in which you must attend the funeral) or other situations of similar gravity. Absences due to other meaningful conflicts, such as job interviews, family celebrations, travel difficulties, student misunderstandings or personal convenience, will not be excused. Students who will be absent from a major exam must notify the Dean’s Office prior to that exam. Absences from class due to the observance of a religious holiday will normally be excused. Individual students who will have to miss class to observe a religious holiday should notify the instructor by the end of the Add/Drop period to make prior arrangements for making up any work that will be missed. The final exam period runs until December 15, 2023.
|
|
ACADEMIC HONESTY
As stated in the university catalog, any student who commits an act of academic
dishonesty will receive a failing grade on the work in which the dishonesty occurred.
In addition, acts of academic dishonesty, irrespective of the weight of the assignment,
may result in the student receiving a failing grade in the course. Instances of
academic dishonesty will be reported to the Dean of Academic Affairs. A student
who is reported twice for academic dishonesty is subject to summary dismissal from
the University. In such a case, the Academic Council will then make a recommendation
to the President, who will make the final decision.
|
STUDENTS WITH LEARNING OR OTHER DISABILITIES
John Cabot University does not discriminate on the basis of disability or handicap.
Students with approved accommodations must inform their professors at the beginning
of the term. Please see the website for the complete policy.
|
|
SCHEDULE
|
|
|
Session | Session Focus | Reading Assignment | Other Assignment | Meeting Place/Exam Dates |
week 1 | Introduction to the Course. Defining digital humanities.
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus.
| Start reading Frankenstein
Wymer. "Reasons to Engage with Digital Humanities." pp.1-9
| | |
week 2 | Frankenstein and Digital Humanities.
http://romantic-circles.org/editions/frankenstein
| Chart the novel’s frames in an xcel sheet.
Choose one of the readings from the romantic-circles.org
| | |
week 3 | Frankenstein: : texts, contexts, influence.
Modern Prometheus ? Monster ?
Shelley Jackson’s Patchwork Girl. A hypertext novel. 1996
| Build dataset of Frankenstein’s antecedents and successors | | |
week 5 | From Xcel to CSV to Omeka. Organization of findings: what is our question? How can we answer it? | Register to Omeka
Select your special area of inquiry
| | |
week 6 | Curating a digital exhibition.
Metadata description: Dublin Core
| 1st home paper due
Practice creating items in Omeka
| | |
week 7 | Archetypes, Tropes, Monsters: collecting visual representations and building an archive | Register to Mindmeister:
https://www.mindmeister.com/
| | |
week 8 | Text mining: tools and practices. | Read Wymer. “Working with Text.”
Chap. 4. pp. 1-12
Register to Antconc. www.laurenceabthony.net/software/antoconc
| | |
week 9 | Images and copyright. | https://search.creativecommons.org/
commons.wikimedia.org
| | |
week 10 | Studying other DH projects on Frankenstein | Find DH projects to show the class: why do they work, or how do they fail? | | |
week 11 | Workshop: Building the Omeka | | | |
week 12 | Workshop: Building the Omeka | | | |
week 13 | Workshop: Building the Omeka | | | |
week 14 | Picking up all the threads
Reflecting on the original text.
| Class discussion: how is our understanding of the text changing | | |
week 15 | White Paper on Findings | | | |
|