JCU Logo

JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY

COURSE CODE: "AH 294-1"
COURSE NAME: "Renaissance Rome and Its Monuments"
SEMESTER & YEAR: Summer Session I 2024
SYLLABUS

INSTRUCTOR: Alexis Ruth Culotta
EMAIL: [email protected]
HOURS: MW 9:00 AM 12:45 PM
TOTAL NO. OF CONTACT HOURS: 45
CREDITS: 3
PREREQUISITES: On-site; activity fee: €25 or $33
OFFICE HOURS:

COURSE DESCRIPTION:

Rome City Series - This on-site course will study the monuments of Renaissance Rome: painting, sculpture and architecture produced by such masters as Bramante, Raphael, and Michelangelo, all attracted to the lucrative service of popes, cardinals and nobles of the Roman court. On-site classes will investigate examples of palace and villa architecture, chapel decoration that encompasses altarpieces and funerary sculpture, as well as urbanistic projects where the city itself was considered as a work of art. In-class lectures will introduce historical context and theory allowing the student to understand artworks studied conceptually and place commissions of painting and sculpture within a socio-historic framework.

Satisfies "the Early Modern World" core course requirement for Art History majors

SUMMARY OF COURSE CONTENT:

From the early decades of the 15th century, the city of Rome began an extended transformation from a neglected output to a leading center of Renaissance innovation. This course will examine the art and architecture produced during this dynamic period until 1527 (the Sack of Rome) to explore several facets, including: the reconciliation of classical ideals and ancient learning with Christian and humanistic beliefs; the re-establishment and expansion of papal power revived, restored, and renewed in a city positioned as "caput mundi’; and the competition and collaboration among artists to define new modes of artistic exploration in painting, sculpture, and urban projects that reflected an image of Rome as an ideal heavenly and secular city.

 

Classes are organized roughly chronologically and thematically, with a focus on the invaluable opportunity to view firsthand works of art in their original context. Class discussions will be based on the analysis of  monuments and  textual sources from the time period, as well as more recent studies conducted with different methods, but closely related to on-site visits. Familiarity with original works of art and primary sources will  provide the foundation for studying the specific historical and cultural context of the Renaissance in Rome.

LEARNING OUTCOMES:

Students will obtain firsthand knowledge of Roman Renaissance painting, sculpture and architecture within the period's cultural context by viewing, interpreting, and discussing works of art in their original location and via the lens of selected readings. 

TEXTBOOK:
NONE
REQUIRED RESERVED READING:
NONE

RECOMMENDED RESERVED READING:
NONE
GRADING POLICY
-ASSESSMENT METHODS:
AssignmentGuidelinesWeight
Four Short Writing Responses (one per week weeks 1-4) 40
On-Site Presentation/Discussion Leading (one, between weeks 2-5) 30
Participation and Attendance  15
Final Project/Paper (End of Week 5) 15

-ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
AWork of this quality directly addresses the question or problem raised and provides a coherent argument displaying an extensive knowledge of relevant information or content. This type of work demonstrates the ability to critically evaluate concepts and theory and has an element of novelty and originality. There is clear evidence of a significant amount of reading beyond that required for the course.
BThis is highly competent level of performance and directly addresses the question or problem raised.There is a demonstration of some ability to critically evaluatetheory and concepts and relate them to practice. Discussions reflect the student’s own arguments and are not simply a repetition of standard lecture andreference material. The work does not suffer from any major errors or omissions and provides evidence of reading beyond the required assignments.
CThis is an acceptable level of performance and provides answers that are clear but limited, reflecting the information offered in the lectures and reference readings.
DThis level of performances demonstrates that the student lacks a coherent grasp of the material.Important information is omitted and irrelevant points included.In effect, the student has barely done enough to persuade the instructor that s/he should not fail.
FThis work fails to show any knowledge or understanding of the issues raised in the question. Most of the material in the answer is irrelevant.

-ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS:

ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS AND EXAMINATION POLICY

Attendance to our course is valuable, not only to grasp the core themes we will cover but also to experience the city via the lens of the Renaissance. Given this, it is expected that students attend every day, however, it is possible that unexpected issues can arise that might impact participation/attendance. In the case you cannot make class, please email Prof C as soon as possible and, for your absence to be excused, please prepare an approximately 500-word summary response to one of our assigned readings that day. This response should highlight the core thesis made by the author, some of the most essential evidence the author uses to support that claim, and the student’s response/reaction to that argumentation. 

 

You cannot make-up a major exam (midterm or final) without the permission of the Dean’s Office. The Dean’s Office will grant such permission only when the absence was caused by a serious impediment, such as a documented illness, hospitalization or death in the immediate family (in which you must attend the funeral) or other situations of similar gravity. Absences due to other meaningful conflicts, such as job interviews, family celebrations, travel difficulties, student misunderstandings or personal convenience, will not be excused. Students who will be absent from a major exam must notify the Dean’s Office prior to that exam. Absences from class due to the observance of a religious holiday will normally be excused. Individual students who will have to miss class to observe a religious holiday should notify the instructor by the end of the Add/Drop period to make prior arrangements for making up any work that will be missed.  

ACADEMIC HONESTY
As stated in the university catalog, any student who commits an act of academic dishonesty will receive a failing grade on the work in which the dishonesty occurred. In addition, acts of academic dishonesty, irrespective of the weight of the assignment, may result in the student receiving a failing grade in the course. Instances of academic dishonesty will be reported to the Dean of Academic Affairs. A student who is reported twice for academic dishonesty is subject to summary dismissal from the University. In such a case, the Academic Council will then make a recommendation to the President, who will make the final decision.
STUDENTS WITH LEARNING OR OTHER DISABILITIES
John Cabot University does not discriminate on the basis of disability or handicap. Students with approved accommodations must inform their professors at the beginning of the term. Please see the website for the complete policy.

SCHEDULE

SessionSession FocusReading AssignmentOther AssignmentMeeting Place/Exam Dates
20 MayCourse Introduction; Setting the Stage for a City in TransitionLoren Partridge, “Introduction”, The Renaissance in Rome (Laurence King, 2012), pp. 9-17; Vasari, Vasari, Preface to "Lives of the Artists" (emphasis on pp. 25-38).   
22 MayRenaissance Foundations: Santa Maria in Trastevere and Santa Cecilia Dale Kinney, “Spolia from the Baths of Caracalla in Sta. Maria in Trastevere.” The Art Bulletin 68, no. 3 (1986): 379–97; Paul Hetherington, “The Mosaics of Pietro Cavallini in Santa Maria in Trastevere.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 33 (1970): 84–106.   
27 MayRome Rebuilds: Campidoglio, Santa Maria Sopra Minerva, and Palazzo della Cancelleria David Karmon, “Renaissance Strategies to Protect the Colosseum: Selective Preservation and Reuse.” Future Anterior: Journal of Historic Preservation, History, Theory, and Criticism 2, no. 2 (2005): x–9; Gail Geiger, “Filippino Lippi’s Carafa ‘Annunciation’: Theology, Artistic Conventions, and Patronage” The Art Bulletin 63, no. 1 (Mar. 1981), pp. 62-75.   
29 MayRoma renovatio: Hunting for Pope Julius II’s Transformations(see course materials in Moodle for today's instructions)  
3 JuneRaphael from the Villa Farnesina to Santa Maria della Pace (with Bramante’s Cloister)Ingrid D. Rowland, “Render on to Caesar the Things Which Are Caesar’s: Humanism and the Arts in the Patronage of Agostino Chigi” Renaissance Quarterly 39, no. 4 (Winter, 1986), pp. 673-730; Michael Hirst, “The Chigi Chapel in S. Maria Della Pace.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 24, no. 3/4 (1961): 161–85.   
5 June“Raphaels” Around TownVirginia Anne Bonito, “The Saint Anne Altar in Sant’Agostino: Restoration and Interpretation.” The Burlington Magazine 124, no. 950 (1982): 268–76; John Shearman, “The Chigi Chapel in S. Maria Del Popolo.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 24, no. 3/4 (1961): 129–60.   
10 JuneWhen Rome Meets Venice: Michelangelo and SebastianoJosephine Jungić, “Joachimist Prophecies in Sebastiano Del Piombo’s Borgherini Chapel and Raphael’s Transfiguration.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 51 (1988): 66–83; Jill Dunkerton, Rachel Billinge, and Matthias Wivel, “Sebastiano and Michelangelo: Infrared Insights into Their Collaboration.” National Gallery Technical Bulletin 38 (2017): 32–55.   
12 JuneRenaissance Recap: A Visit to the Galleria Borghese (see course materials in Moodle for today's instructions)  
17 JuneEnduring Ephemera of the Renaissance: The Frescoed Façades of Sixteenth-Century RomePatricia Reilly, “Triumphal Chiaroscuro Painting During the Reign of Julius II.” Eternal Ephemera: The Papal Possesso and its Legacies (Toronto: Centre for Renaissance and Reformation Studies, 2020): 125-164; “Haec Domus Expectet: The Casa Sander Façade and Constructing Sixteenth-Century German Identity in Rome.” Opus Incertum 8 (1) (2022).   
19 JuneRenaissance Reflections: Continuing the Conversation (Discussion of Final Project Papers)(Final Project Presentation Day)