JCU Logo

JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY

COURSE CODE: "EN 110-14"
COURSE NAME: "Advanced Composition"
SEMESTER & YEAR: Spring 2024
SYLLABUS

INSTRUCTOR: Livia Sacchetti
EMAIL: [email protected]
HOURS: TTH 1:30 PM 2:45 PM
TOTAL NO. OF CONTACT HOURS: 45
CREDITS: 3
PREREQUISITES: Prerequisite: Placement via JCU English Composition Placement Exam or completion of either EN 103 or EN 105 with a grade of C or above
OFFICE HOURS:

COURSE DESCRIPTION:
This course prepares students to read, think, and write critically. Students will develop their ability to read critically and analyze primary and secondary sources, hone their composition skills through in and out of class essays, and will complete the course by writing and revising a fully-documented and well-reasoned research paper, complemented by an annotated bibliography and literature review. EN110 focuses on the argumentative form, encouraging students to position their work within current critical discourses. The course develops the following skills: source selection and interrogation, identification and contextualization of themes, thesis development and defense, digital literacies, use of library resources, and careful citation in MLA style. Students must receive a grade of C or above in this course to fulfill the University’s English Composition requirement and to be eligible to take courses in English literature.
SUMMARY OF COURSE CONTENT:

This course prepares students to read, write, and think critically. Structured as a workshop, it will train students to develop their ideas and more complex conceptual arguments through a process. The stages of research, writing, and presenting will form a crucial part of the students' experience, preparing them for all academic courses.

Students will learn to read critically, paying close attention to detail; to develop a cogent and conclusive argument; and to research a topic thoroughly, using the sources found effectively.

 

 

LEARNING OUTCOMES:
This course prepares students to read, think, and write critically. Students will develop their ability to read critically and analyze primary and secondary sources, hone their composition skills through in and out of class essays, and will complete the course by writing and revising a fully-documented and well-reasoned research paper, complemented by an annotated bibliography and literature review. EN110 focuses on the argumentative form, encouraging students to position their work within current critical discourses. The course develops the following skills: source selection and interrogation, identification and contextualization of themes, thesis development and defense, digital literacies, use of library resources, and careful citation in MLA style. Students must receive a grade of C or above in this course to fulfill the University’s English Composition requirement and to be eligible to take courses in English literature.
TEXTBOOK:
NONE
REQUIRED RESERVED READING:
NONE

RECOMMENDED RESERVED READING:
NONE
GRADING POLICY
-ASSESSMENT METHODS:
AssignmentGuidelinesWeight
In-class written assignments 10%
Paper one 10%
Paper two 20%
Paper 3 20%
Midterm  10%
Final Exam 20%
Class Participation 10%

-ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
AWork of this quality directly addresses the question or problem raised and provides a coherent argument displaying an extensive knowledge of relevant information or content. This type of work demonstrates the ability to critically evaluate concepts and theory and has an element of novelty and originality. There is clear evidence of a significant amount of reading beyond that required for the course.
BThis is highly competent level of performance and directly addresses the question or problem raised.There is a demonstration of some ability to critically evaluatetheory and concepts and relate them to practice. Discussions reflect the student’s own arguments and are not simply a repetition of standard lecture andreference material. The work does not suffer from any major errors or omissions and provides evidence of reading beyond the required assignments.
CThis is an acceptable level of performance and provides answers that are clear but limited, reflecting the information offered in the lectures and reference readings.
DThis level of performances demonstrates that the student lacks a coherent grasp of the material.Important information is omitted and irrelevant points included.In effect, the student has barely done enough to persuade the instructor that s/he should not fail.
FThis work fails to show any knowledge or understanding of the issues raised in the question. Most of the material in the answer is irrelevant.

-ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS:

ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS AND EXAMINATION POLICY

Attendance is mandatory.  After three absences, your overall grade for the course is reduced by one grade point.  For example, if you final grade for the class is a B, it will become B- if you have had three or more absences in the term.

ACADEMIC HONESTY
As stated in the university catalog, any student who commits an act of academic dishonesty will receive a failing grade on the work in which the dishonesty occurred. In addition, acts of academic dishonesty, irrespective of the weight of the assignment, may result in the student receiving a failing grade in the course. Instances of academic dishonesty will be reported to the Dean of Academic Affairs. A student who is reported twice for academic dishonesty is subject to summary dismissal from the University. In such a case, the Academic Council will then make a recommendation to the President, who will make the final decision.
STUDENTS WITH LEARNING OR OTHER DISABILITIES
John Cabot University does not discriminate on the basis of disability or handicap. Students with approved accommodations must inform their professors at the beginning of the term. Please see the website for the complete policy.

SCHEDULE

Week 1

Focus: Critical Reading -- identifying key details and developing an interpretation

Week 2

Focus: Critical Reading -- identifying key details and developing an interpretatio

Week 3

Focus: Critical Reading -- identifying key details and developing an interpretation

Week 4

Writing Workshop 1: Paper 1 -- Research; planning; development; writing

Week 5

Writing Workshop 1: Paper 1 -- Research; planning; development; writing

Week 6

Writing Workshop 1: Paper 1 -- Research; planning; development; writing

Week 7

Midterm -- preparation and exam

Week 8

Writing Workshop 2: Paper 2 -- Developing an original, detailed, and fully focused argument

Research; planning; development; writing

Week 9

Writing Workshop 2: Paper 2 -- Developing an original, detailed, and fully focused argument

Research; planning; development; writing

 

Week 10

Writing Workshop 2: Paper 2 -- Developing an original, detailed, and fully focused argument

Research; planning; development; writing

 

Week 11

Writing Workshop 3: Paper 3 -- Developing a comparative argument

Research; planning; development; writing

 

Week 12

Writing Workshop 3: Paper 3 -- Developing a comparative argument

Research; planning; development; writing

Week 13

Writing Workshop 3: Paper 3 -- Developing a comparative argument

Research; planning; development; writing

Week 14

Preparing for the Final exam