Comparative Politics is both a subject and a method of study. Its goal is to understand variation in important political outcomes across countries and time. The course examines the nature, development, structure and functioning of the political systems of countries with very different cultures, social and economic profiles, political histories and geographic characteristics. The course attempts to answer the following large questions:
- What distinguishes democratic from non-democratic regimes? Why do some countries democ- ratize whereas others do not? Do democracies perform better than non-democratic regimes in the provision of public goods?
- What are the causes and consequences of different political institutions? What determines their subsequent development?
Before addressing such questions, we need to think about how we should address them. Broadly speaking we address questions by generating hypotheses and then testing them with empirical evidence. These gives rise to two further general issues:
- What hypotheses should we test? Hypotheses are associated with different theoretical schools or approaches within political science.
- What evidence should we use in generating and testing hypotheses? Should we focus on a small number of cases and study them in depth? Or should we include as many cases as possible, using statistical techniques to analyze the data?
These are questions of comparative method, and multiple methods are used in Comparative Politics. The course will convene twice a week. The first session will be a lecture, while the second session will have presentations from students and a discussion. The aim is that by the end of the course you should be able to engage critically with questions falling under the headings of the broad questions outlined above. You should be able to respond to particular questions about the different topics of the course, drawing on the relevant literature and upon empirical evidence in order to develop and support cogent answers to those questions. You should also be able to think about theoretical arguments as well as empirical testing and evidence regarding such arguments.