JCU Logo

JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY

COURSE CODE: "EN 110-12"
COURSE NAME: "Advanced Composition"
SEMESTER & YEAR: Fall 2023
SYLLABUS

INSTRUCTOR: Theresa Lindo
EMAIL: arutt@john cabot.edu
HOURS: TTH 1:30 PM 2:45 PM
TOTAL NO. OF CONTACT HOURS: 45
CREDITS: 3
PREREQUISITES: Prerequisite: Placement via JCU English Composition Placement Exam or completion of either EN 103 or EN 105 with a grade of C or above
OFFICE HOURS: By appointment

COURSE DESCRIPTION:
This course prepares students to read, think, and write critically. Students will develop their ability to read critically and analyze primary and secondary sources, hone their composition skills through in and out of class essays, and will complete the course by writing and revising a fully-documented and well-reasoned research paper, complemented by an annotated bibliography and literature review. EN110 focuses on the argumentative form, encouraging students to position their work within current critical discourses. The course develops the following skills: source selection and interrogation, identification and contextualization of themes, thesis development and defense, digital literacies, use of library resources, and careful citation in MLA style. Students must receive a grade of C or above in this course to fulfill the University’s English Composition requirement and to be eligible to take courses in English literature.
SUMMARY OF COURSE CONTENT:
The course examines a range of fundamental writing strategies, starting with grammar, critical reading of sources, summarizing, paraphrasing and proper quoting; it continues with the writing of a topic proposal, selection and citation of sources, literature review, and thesis development. Research and use of library resources will also be covered. Students will be required to submit assignments through TurnitinUK.
LEARNING OUTCOMES:
Students will learn to write a well-organized and error-free argumentative research paper. By the end of the course students will be able to:

Grammar
            Write sophisticated as well as grammatically and idiomatically correct English prose

Reading
             Read to comprehend increasingly complex material

             Read and think critically

Vocabulary
              Expand vocabulary through reading and writing
              Develop subject specific terminology through reading and writing

Rhetoric
             Write well-organized essays, focusing specifically on argumentative essays

             Write a strong and developed thesis statement with supporting arguments

             Think, read, write critically for an academic audience

              Write a developed outline

              Paraphrase and summarize
            
Cite and write using documentation
             Write a fully documented research paper

Research and sourcing (can be covered by a librarian in one or more workshops in the library)
               
Be familiar with research and information literacy skills including                      
                        - A reinforcement of searching skills: catalog, database, and web sourcing
                         - Source evaluation

                         - Subject searching

                         - Use MLA style for all aspects of a research paper

                         - Understand how to avoid plagiarism

TEXTBOOK:
Book TitleAuthorPublisherISBN numberLibrary Call NumberCommentsFormatLocal BookstoreOnline Purchase
“They Say / I Say”: the Moves that Matter in Academic Writing: with Readings (5th edition)Gerald Graff, Cathy Birkenstein and Russel DurstW. W. Norton & Company978-0393538700 Paperback ‏: ‎ 400 pages (Note: The e-book version is different than the paperback version)Hard Copy  
REQUIRED RESERVED READING:
NONE

RECOMMENDED RESERVED READING:
NONE
GRADING POLICY
-ASSESSMENT METHODS:
AssignmentGuidelinesWeight
Annotated Bibliography 15%
In-class writings/homework 30%
Literature Review 15%
Research Paper 30%
Final and Final Presentations 10%

-ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
AWork of this quality directly addresses the question or problem raised and provides a coherent argument displaying an extensive knowledge of relevant information or content. This type of work demonstrates the ability to critically evaluate concepts and theory and has an element of novelty and originality. There is clear evidence of a significant amount of reading beyond that required for the course.
BThis is highly competent level of performance and directly addresses the question or problem raised.There is a demonstration of some ability to critically evaluatetheory and concepts and relate them to practice. Discussions reflect the student’s own arguments and are not simply a repetition of standard lecture andreference material. The work does not suffer from any major errors or omissions and provides evidence of reading beyond the required assignments.
CThis is an acceptable level of performance and provides answers that are clear but limited, reflecting the information offered in the lectures and reference readings.
DThis level of performances demonstrates that the student lacks a coherent grasp of the material.Important information is omitted and irrelevant points included. In effect, the student has barely done enough to persuade the instructor that s/he should not fail.
FThis work fails to show any knowledge or understanding of the issues raised in the question. Most of the material in the answer is irrelevant.

-ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS:

Attendance is crucial to student success and you are expected to attend every class meeting.

●      You will be allowed three, no-questions-asked absences. After the third absence, 5% will be deducted from the overall grade for each additional absence. After the sixth absence, you will be failed automatically from the course.

●      The only absences that will be excused are those that are approved by the Dean’s office.

●      You are responsible for the material covered and completing in-class assignments if you are absent. Ask a classmate, check the Moodle course page or email me.

●      Missed in-class writings must be submitted at the next class meeting.

●      If you must miss a lesson for religious reasons, please inform me in advance.

●      Absence does not excuse work from being graded as late.

●      To attend a lesson remotely, students must present written permission from the Dean of Students in advance of the lesson.

●      Students who arrive to class after attendance has been taken will be counted as late. Two late arrivals will count as one absence.

Disruptive behavior will result in dismissal from the class and will be counted as one absence. This includes not adhering to COVID measures, sleeping in class or unauthorized use of cell phones, disruptive behavior towards other students or the flow of the class.

ACADEMIC HONESTY
As stated in the university catalog, any student who commits an act of academic dishonesty will receive a failing grade on the work in which the dishonesty occurred. In addition, acts of academic dishonesty, irrespective of the weight of the assignment, may result in the student receiving a failing grade in the course. Instances of academic dishonesty will be reported to the Dean of Academic Affairs. A student who is reported twice for academic dishonesty is subject to summary dismissal from the University. In such a case, the Academic Council will then make a recommendation to the President, who will make the final decision.
STUDENTS WITH LEARNING OR OTHER DISABILITIES
John Cabot University does not discriminate on the basis of disability or handicap. Students with approved accommodations must inform their professors at the beginning of the term. Please see the website for the complete policy.

SCHEDULE

 

JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY

Fall  2023

Course Title:

Advanced Composition

Course Nr./Meeting Times/Location:

EN 110 – 12 T/TH 1:30 PM 2:45 PM Corsini Room 1

Credits & hours:

3 credits; 45 contact hours

Pre/Co-Requisites:

EN 103 or EN 105 or equivalent, or placement

Professor:

Theresa Lindo

Office Hours:

Email address:

By appointment

[email protected]

Course description

This course prepares students to read, think, and write critically. Students will develop their ability to read critically and analyze primary and secondary sources, hone their composition skills through in and out of class essays, and will complete the course by writing and revising a fully-documented and well-reasoned research paper, complemented by an annotated bibliography and literature review. EN110 focuses on the argumentative form, encouraging students to position their work within current critical discourses. The course develops the following skills: source selection and interrogation, identification and contextualization of themes, thesis development and defense, digital literacies, use of library resources, and careful citation in MLA style. Students must receive a grade of C or above in this course to fulfill the University’s English Composition requirement and to be eligible to take courses in English literature.

Summary of course content

The course examines a range of fundamental writing strategies, starting with grammar, critical reading of sources, summarizing, paraphrasing and proper quoting; it continues with the writing of a topic proposal, selection and citation of sources, literature review, and thesis development. Research and use of library resources will also be covered. Students may be required to submit assignments through TurnitinUK.

Course Learning Outcomes

Students will be able to write well-organized and error-free argumentative essays, and to do basic academic research.

Although it is difficult to provide a checklist for ‘good writing’, you will work on five main aspects of your writing skills:

Reading

· Read to comprehend increasingly complex material

· Read and think critically

Writing and rhetoric

· Write well-organized essays, focusing specifically on argumentative essays

· Write a strong and developed thesis statement with supporting arguments

· Think and write critically for an academic audience

· Write a developed outline

· Paraphrase and summarize, evaluate and synthesize

· Cite and write using correct MLA style

· Write a fully documented research paper

Research and sourcing (can be covered by a librarian in one or more class sessions or workshops)

· Be familiar with research and information literacy skills including

§ A reinforcement of searching skills: catalog, database, and web sourcing

§ Source evaluation

§ Subject searching

§ Utilize MLA style for all aspects of a research paper

§ Understand how to avoid plagiarism

Grammar

· Write sophisticated as well as grammatically and idiomatically correct English prose

Vocabulary

· Expand vocabulary through reading and writing

· Develop subject specific terminology through reading and writing

 


Required Textbook:

   

Title : “They Say / I Say”: the Moves that Matter in Academic Writing: with Readings

Authors : Gerald Graff, Cathy Birkenstein and Russel Durst

Other Contributors : Laura J. Panning Davies

Publisher ‏ : ‎ W. W. Norton & Company; Fifth edition (July 15, 2021)

Language ‏ : ‎ English

Paperback ‏ : ‎ 400 pages (Note: The e-book version is different than the paperback version. Get the paperback version, if possible)

ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0393538702

ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0393538700

 

Required Other Readings: Titles and authors of other readings will be listed on Moodle throughout the semester.

 

Useful Tools:

In addition to required readings, a handbook of grammar, usage , and reference will be an invaluable resource for you during the semester. The Purdue Online Writing Lab (OWL) is one example of such a source. It is free and widely respected.

 

Assessment Criteria:

A: Outstanding Grade A/A-: This is outstanding writing which reflects a perceptive and thoughtful

response to the assignment. It is well organized with excellent development of ideas and reflects   the writer's command of appropriate rhetorical strategies. When sources are used, they are  correctly cited and smoothly integrated into the text. The prose is vigorous and fresh, and the writer is clearly in control of the standard conventions of English prose. There are no errors in the mechanics of writing.

 

B: Very Good Grade B/B-: This is very good writing that fulfills the assignment and shows evidence  of clear, mature thought and good planning. It is well organized with good supporting details. The student has introduced elements of novelty and has clearly done some valid research and indicated sources. The writing is fluent, and there are only minor, sporadic errors in the mechanics of writing which do not detract from the overall essay.

 

C: Satisfactory Grade C/C-: This is satisfactory writing that fulfills the assignment and is adequately developed. It reflects the source materials and class discussion At C level, the writing is clear and coherent with relatively few errors in usage and mechanics, but the writer fails to demonstrate any particular strength that would mark this writing above average. At C- level, mechanics and usage are frequently not under control, and/or the student has not really engaged with the topic.

 

D: Below Average Grade D/D-: This is below-average writing which fulfills the assignment but exhibits major problems in writing. There may be difficulty with the presentation of ideas (e.g., lack or total absence of a clear thesis, weak organization, poor development of ideas, or incoherence), or it may reflect poor control of the conventions of standard English prose (e.g., poor use of idiom, inappropriate diction, poor spelling) or be marred by enough errors in the mechanics of writing to seriously distract the reader.

 

F: Unsatisfactory Grade F: This is writing that relates to the topic but fails to fulfill the assignment either because of poor organization and lack of clarity or because the writing reflects a lack of control over the basic conventions of standard English usage. There may be frequent sentence boundary problems, poor use of idiom, inappropriate diction (words used incorrectly), agreement errors, or basic verb tense problems.

 

Attendance requirements:

Because the course is based on a series of workshops and in-class activities, attendance and class contribution are essential. Students are allowed 3 absences during the term, penalty-free. Each additional absence beyond the 3 allowed will result in the reduction in the final grade for the course by 1%. Students arriving to class after attendance has been taken will be counted as late. Two late arrivals will count as an absence. Students are required to attend at least 70% of all class sessions   for the semester in order to pass. Students who arrive at 8 absences without prior arrangement   with the professor will fail the course outright without further ado. Please refer to our course Moodle page and the JCU catalog for the full attendance and absence policies.

Homework and Other Assignments:

Please note that there is homework in nearly every class, so if you are absent, it is your responsibility to call a classmate – not the professor – and consult the course Moodle page to find out what was covered in class and which assignments are due.

 

All students must turn in essays and homework punctually. Assignments are considered on time only if submitted at (or before) the beginning of class on the due date. Late assignments will not be accepted.

 

Class Participation

Your participation is required to contribute to the exchange of ideas on any given topic discussed in class through thorough preparation, active listening, asking questions, taking notes on what is being discussed and providing oral feedback.

 

Disruptive behavior, including that which interferes with the participation of other students, discussions in class, or lectures by the professor; multi-tasking by reading or working on other assignments, using your phone or other electronic device not specifically required for course activities, initiating or participating in side conversations; sleeping --which, aside from being just  plain rude, is a distraction to all; eating or snacking (if you need to do this for health reasons, please obtain permission first); inappropriate posture during class sessions, arriving late or leaving class early without prior consent from the professor will reflect negatively on you and will incur penalties, including but not limited to a private or public warning from the professor, a request to change location within the classroom, a request leave class for the day without the possibility to make up missed work and resulting in an absence on your attendance record, or – in worse-case scenarios – forced withdrawal from the course.

 

Leaving class early without prior consent from the professor will result in an absence for that class session.

 

Readings, Worksheets/Reading Responses

20%

3 In-Class Essays (legible handwriting is part of your assessment)

30%

1 In-Class Research Proposal

10%

2 In-Class Annotated Bibliographies (1 with 2 sources, 1 with 3 sources)

20%

2 Final Paper blocks (drafts of papers)

Mandatory (not graded – see below)

Final Essay Oral Presentation (final exam)

10%

Class Participation (including active discussions on readings, peer reviews and other in-class writings)

10%

 

 

WRITING CENTER: Students attend at least one Writing Center session to review each in-class essay draft, the final paper draft and the final paper before submission to professor.

 

The following is a list of communication recommendations:

      Avoid having a third party write to the professor (parent, therapist, doctor, boss, etc.) and face the music if you missed class or missed an assignment. 

      Avoid explaining anything about your absence (no epic recitations of food poisoning, missed busses, mental health struggles, surgeries, photos of busted knees, etc.).

      Your emails should begin with "Dear Professor” and should follow with why you are writing. Ex: “Dear Professor, I am unable to make it to class with good reason. I have checked with my classmates and I plan to hand in the assignment on x day at x time."

      Let us take it as a given that I believe you and that if you feel it was necessary to miss class, I support you 100%. To this end, late assignments will be capped at 75% and no extension requests will be entertained.

      This means that reaching out to the Dean's office to petition to be exempted from the course's absence policy is not necessary.

 

 

 

Academic honesty

As stated in the university catalog, any student who commits an act of academic dishonesty, including the use of generative AI, will receive a failing grade on the work in which the dishonesty occurred. In addition, acts of academic dishonesty, irrespective of the weight of the assignment, may result in the student receiving a failing grade in the course. Instances of academic dishonesty will be reported to the Dean of Academic Affairs. A student who is reported twice for academic dishonesty is subject to summary dismissal from the University. In such a case, the Academic Council will then make a recommendation to the President, who will make the final decision.

 

Students with learning or other disabilities

John Cabot University does not discriminate on the basis of disability or handicap. Students with approved accommodations must inform their professors at the beginning of the term. Please see the website for the complete policy.


Course Learning Activities

Assignment

Guidelines

Weight

Worksheets

Worksheets (approximately 500 words each) are designed to guide students on basic MLA formal requirements (front page, in-text citation, works cited), and to encourage organizing knowledge extracted from the article. The knowledge component includes a terminology section (one terms with definition) and a quotes section (two selected quotes with lead-in and follow up sentences complete with in-text citation in MLA format).
Note: Late worksheets will NOT be accepted.

10%

Annotated Readings

For each reading session, students must submit annotated printouts as specified in the course schedule.

10%

In-Class Essays

In-Class essays represent an opportunity for application and analysis of knowledge gained from source articles. Required length is 500-600 words. Essays below 500 words will receive a maximum grade of C; essays under 450 words receive an F.

NOTE: Make-ups for in-class essays are rare. Plan not to miss any.

30%

Research Proposal

The research proposal is the first step towards the final paper. It consists of five sections: 1) specific topic/purpose/claim; 2) general topic/larger categories/ big themes; 3) conflict; 4) method; 5) tentative title. All sections, except for the tentative title, should be one paragraph in length.

Required Writing: 500 words.

10%

Annotated Bibliographies

Students identify five secondary sources for use in their final project. Sources should be a mix of scholarly articles and books, trade books, newspaper and magazine articles. Sources under 5 pages will not be accepted.

Required Writing: approx. 150-200 words per source, total 1000 words

20%

Drafts

In the last three weeks of class, we will have workshop style sessions during which you will work on your paper for the entire class period. You will be expected to bring 500 word drafts for continued work and revision. You are also required to submit two 500-800 word drafts as specified in the course schedule. A late draft will set the grade for the final paper back by 1/3 of a letter grade; a missing draft will set it back by 2/3 of a letter grade. Students who are not actively working on their paper during workshops may be asked to leave.

Mandatory (not graded)

Final Exam

This is a presentation of your final essay. An F in the final paper will result in an F for the course.

10%

Participation

This includes active discussions on readings, peer reviews, other in-class writings, general preparedness and overall contribution to the course.

10%

 

 


 

COURSE SCHEDULE

Subject to change based on class needs. Any changes will be communicated immediately by the professor.

 

Wk 1: Introductions and the Creative Process

 

 

 

 

Course Introduction

Syllabus review

HW: --Reading A: Adler. Academic texts and how to absorb them

--Video 1: Lamar

 

 

 

The creative process. Case study and discussion: hip hop Pulitzer Prize winner KL.

Impressions of Video 1 (in-class)

Common themes in Reading A and Video 1

HW: -- Read and annotate Juffer part 1. Bring to next class.

 

Wk 2: The Creative Process and Rhetoric

 

 

 

Discussion on Reading 1.1 (rhetoric); Video 2 (Mr. Rogers, if there is time)

HM: -- Read and annotate Juffer part 2 (Bring/submit annotated copy to next class)

--Complete Video 2 at home. What are speakers main points?

 

 

 

Discussion on Reading 1 and Video 2: Thesis, persuasion and argument

HW: --Worksheet 1 Juffer (See instructions on Moodle)

Wk 3: Making Sources Work for You: Quoting, Paraphrasing and Citing

 

 

 

 

Worksheet 1 (Juffer) DUE

Planning an essay: brainstorming, topic selection (from Reading 1) and organizing.

Reading Lamott (in class). Schedule appt. to review essay 1 draft in Writing Center.

HW: --Read and annotate Roberts
--Prepare draft of Essay 1.
Topics inspired by Juffer.

 

 

 

In-Class Essay 1/2 (500 words)

HW: --Read and annotate Strong, Part 1. Bring to next class.

Wk 4: Making Sources Work for You: what they say and what you can use

 

 

 

Discussion on Strong part 1.

 

 

 

Organization; interacting with and using sources for support

HW: -- Read and annotate Strong part 2 (Submit and bring annotated copy to next class)

 

 

 

Discussion on Strong part 2.

 

 

 

HW: --Worksheet 2 Strong (same instructions as for Worksheet 1)

Wk 5: Sources: what they say and whats their goal

 

 

 

Worksheet 2 (Strong) DUE

 

 

 

In-class workshop: Library catalogues, research and source selection. Bring laptops.

 

 

 

HW:

--Read and annotate Appiah (Bring/submit annotated copy to next class)

 

 

 

Discussion on Appiah.

In-class lab: Style. The source’s voice, your voice.

 

 

 

HW: -- Video The Danger of a Single Story. Analyze and prepare response.

Wk 6: Advanced essay planning and structure

 

 

 

Discussion of Adichie.

Workshop: joining the conversation and avoiding the single story.

 

 

 

HW: --worksheet 3 Appiah (Same instructions as for Worksheets 1 and 2)

 

 

 

Worksheet 3 (Appiah) DUE

 

 

 

In-class lab: brainstorming, sourcing, structuring and drafting next in-class essay. Topics from Strong or Appiah. Schedule appt. to review essay 2 draft in Writing Center.

HW: draft essay 2.

Wk 7: Sources: Joining the conversation with your own opinion and how to support it

 

 

 

In-Class Essay 2/2 (500 words)

 

 

 

HW: --Research/select topic for final paper (identify and incorporate primary sources)

--Read Miller & Jurecic. (Bring annotated copy to next class)

 

 

 

Discussion on Miller & Jurecic.

In-class lab: drafting a research proposal (instructions on Moodle) and writing in blocks

 

 

 

HW: --Research proposal for essay 3


 

Wk 8: Sources: style, syntax, tone and formatting

 

 

 

Research Proposal Due

Annotated bibliography: why and how to create it.

 

 

 

Workshop: syntax, style, tone, structure and MLA. Preparing the A.B. and Biblio.

HW: -- Research sources for final topic, draft Annotated Bibliography

 

 

 

Library research in-class

 

 

 

HW: --complete annotated bibliography 1 (2 sources). What they say, what you need.

Wk 9: Structure and formatting

 

 

Annotated bibliography 1 (2 sources) due

 

 

Outlining, quoting, paraphrasing

 

 

Schedule appt. to review final paper outline and draft in Writing Center.

 

 

In-class research for and drafting of Annotated Bib. 2 (3 sources)

 

Wk 10: Blocks

 

 

 

A.B. 2 (3 sources) due. Workshop: Outlining, sentence flow and consistency.

Schedule appt. to review draft in Writing Center.

HW: Reading D (Lamott) and Video 4 (Coel)

 

 

 

Workshop: Draft a 500-word block in-class. Include an extended term/concept definition HW: Revise and perfect block.

Wk 11: Introductions and conclusions

 

 

 

 

Writing lab: writing the extended thesis, introduction and conclusion

 

 

 

Draft/block 1 of In-class essay 3 Due

Workshop: Write a new 500-word block to share next class during peer review.

Wk 12: Counterarguments and Rogers

 

 

 

Prof. consultations in-class on draft

 

 

 

In-class workshop: the counterargument and the Rogerian method. HW: --Incorporate Rogerian method of counterarguing into draft Schedule appt. to review draft in Writing Center.

Wk 13: Reworking the essay

 

 

 

Draft/block 2 of in-class essay 3 Due

Prof. consultations in-class on draft

In-class workshop: peer review of final draft (version before final submission)

Wk 14: Final paper presentation prep

 

 

 

Prof. consultations in-class on draft

 

 

 

Final Paper Due

 

 

 

In-class workshop: oral presentations and slides development

Wk 15: Finals week

 

 

 

Final Exam: Final essay presentations

The final exam could be any day during finals week. Make your plans accordingly.

 

Have a great semester!