JCU Logo

JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY

COURSE CODE: "EC 480"
COURSE NAME: "Senior Seminar in Economics and Finance"
SEMESTER & YEAR: Spring 2018
SYLLABUS

INSTRUCTOR: Mary Merva
EMAIL: [email protected]
HOURS: T 6:00-8:45 PM
TOTAL NO. OF CONTACT HOURS: 45
CREDITS: 3
PREREQUISITES: Prerequisites: EC 301, EC 302 or EC 316, FIN 301, EC 360 or MA 209 (as of Fall 23)
OFFICE HOURS:

COURSE DESCRIPTION:
Designed to be a capstone course, emphasis is placed on both theoretical and quantitative methods in the fields of economics and finance. Basic tools of economics and statistics are used to analyze a variety of contemporary economic problems and policy issues. Students read through major papers and may undertake research on specific topics so as to develop their understanding of economics and finance. Papers and topics cover the current issues of interest in the areas of microeconomics, macroeconomics, econometrics, and finance to include the CFA Professional Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct. Students may be expected to present and write about their research topics as well as demonstrate an ability to work with quantitative information. The course is structured into modules/sections taught by a group of faculty members.
SUMMARY OF COURSE CONTENT:
This course aims at enhancing quantitative and mathematical reasoning skills, as well as developing the ability to communicate effectively in written, spoken, and graphical form. It also aims at enhancing knowledge in the field of Economics and Finance. Designed to be a capstone course, emphasis will be put on both theoretical and quantitative methods. Basic tools and methods of economics and statistics are used to understand and analyze a variety of contemporary economic problems and policy issues chosen by the instructors.
LEARNING OUTCOMES:

LOS 1:  Build a solid understanding of and knowledge base in microeconomics, macroeconomics, and finance.            

LOS 2:  Development of critical-thinking skills and learn to apply economic analysis to understand economic events and everyday problems.

LOS 3:  Learn how to us empirical evidence in evaluating economic problems and theories, and to evaluate strategic business and policy proposals.

LOS 4:  Mastering research methods in the field and develop the ability to gather research data, conduct basic statistical analysis and interpret results. 

LOS 5:  Develop adequate training in mathematical methods to develop problem-solving skills, perform proofs and prepare for further graduate studies in the areas of economics and finance.

LOS 6:  Master solid communication skills that enable students to formulate a well-organized argument and communicate effectively in written, spoken, and graphical form about specific economic and financial issues.

LOS 7:  Gain awareness of the CFA Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct.

 

TEXTBOOK:
NONE
REQUIRED RESERVED READING:
NONE

RECOMMENDED RESERVED READING:
NONE
GRADING POLICY
-ASSESSMENT METHODS:
AssignmentGuidelinesWeight
Equity Research ReportStudents prepare an equity research report on a selected stock. Guidelines are in the Frohring Library Research Guides for EC 480.20%
White Paper on Sovereign DebtGuidelines are in the Frohring Library Research Guides for EC 48020%
CFA Ethics and Professional Standards TestIn class multiple choice exam.10%
Seminar DiscussionsIn class discussions on assigned papers and/or topics on the syllabus. Students are expected to participate, contribute, and lead discussions demonstrating competency in the assigned work.10%
Microeconomics Research Paper and PresentationGuidelines are posted on MyJCU.40%

-ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
AWork of this quality directly addresses the question or problem raised and provides a coherent argument displaying an extensive knowledge of relevant information or content. This type of work demonstrates the ability to critically evaluate concepts and theory and has an element of novelty and originality. There is clear evidence of a significant amount of reading beyond that required for the course. 93-100: A 90-92.99: A-
BThis is highly competent level of performance and directly addresses the question or problem raised.There is a demonstration of some ability to critically evaluatetheory and concepts and relate them to practice. Discussions reflect the student’s own arguments and are not simply a repetition of standard lecture andreference material. The work does not suffer from any major errors or omissions and provides evidence of reading beyond the required assignments. 86-89.99: B+ 83-85.99: B 80-82.99: B-
CThis is an acceptable level of performance and provides answers that are clear but limited, reflecting the information offered in the lectures and reference readings. 75-79.99: C+ 70-74.99: C 65-69.99: C-
DThis level of performances demonstrates that the student lacks a coherent grasp of the material.Important information is omitted and irrelevant points included.In effect, the student has barely done enough to persuade the instructor that s/he should not fail. 60-64.99: D+ 55-59.99: D 50-54.99: D-
FThis work fails to show any knowledge or understanding of the issues raised in the question. Most of the material in the answer is irrelevant. Below 50

-ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS:

ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS AND EXAMINATION POLICY

You cannot make-up a major exam (midterm or final) without the permission of the Dean’s Office. The Dean’s Office will grant such permission only when the absence was caused by a serious impediment, such as a documented illness, hospitalization or death in the immediate family (in which you must attend the funeral) or other situations of similar gravity. Absences due to other meaningful conflicts, such as job interviews, family celebrations, travel difficulties, student misunderstandings or personal convenience, will not be excused. Students who will be absent from a major exam must notify the Dean’s Office prior to that exam. Absences from class due to the observance of a religious holiday will normally be excused. Individual students who will have to miss class to observe a religious holiday should notify the instructor by the end of the Add/Drop period to make prior arrangements for making up any work that will be missed.

Attendance is mandatory.

 

ACADEMIC HONESTY
As stated in the university catalog, any student who commits an act of academic dishonesty will receive a failing grade on the work in which the dishonesty occurred. In addition, acts of academic dishonesty, irrespective of the weight of the assignment, may result in the student receiving a failing grade in the course. Instances of academic dishonesty will be reported to the Dean of Academic Affairs. A student who is reported twice for academic dishonesty is subject to summary dismissal from the University. In such a case, the Academic Council will then make a recommendation to the President, who will make the final decision.
STUDENTS WITH LEARNING OR OTHER DISABILITIES
John Cabot University does not discriminate on the basis of disability or handicap. Students with approved accommodations must inform their professors at the beginning of the term. Please see the website for the complete policy.

SCHEDULE

Week 1 Tuesday January 16

Researching economics and finance: information resources and writing: the White Paper and the Equity Research Report.  Introduction to accessing Bloomberg Terminal data. Library Information Session with the Reference Librarian.  Begin lecture on valuation.

Assignment 1: Equity Research Report: presentations and paper due week 4: Company chosen by class.

Readings

  1. What is Valuation? by Professor Aswath Damodaran, NYU Stern School of Business:http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/background/valintro.htm March 21, 2014

  2. What’s in an Equity Research Report? by Brian Cheasare; this is a nice 20 minute video on key elements of writing an ERP.

http://www.mergersandinquisitions.com/equity-research-report/

  1. CFA Equity Research Report Essentials 2013

  2. Guidelines on the Frohring Library website: http://johncabot.libguides.com/EC480/equity-research-report

     

    Discussion of topics of interest for research papers.

Week 2 Tuesday January 23

Information Cascades - discussion questions assigned.

Classroom Games: Information Cascades by Lisa Anderson and Charles Holt, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 10, No. 4 (Autumn, 1996)  http://www.jstor.org/stable/2138561

Learning from the Behavior of Others: Conformity, Fads, and Informational Cascades by Sushil Bikhchandani and David Hirshleifer, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 12, No. 3 (Summer, 1998) http://www.jstore.org/stable/2647037

Part 2: How to write a research statement.

Review of financial data for selected company for the Equity Research Report.

Week 3 Tuesday January 30

Part I:  Sovereign Debt - discussion questions assigned to be prepared for class.

Begin Assignment 2: the White Paper:  You have been asked by your employer, a pension fund, to provide a recommendation as to the ratings of a specific country’s sovereign debt and potential purchase for a portfolio.  Include in your paper a critical assessment of rating agencies.  Write a 4 to 5-page White Paper for your client and give a 10-minute summary report with 3 to 10 power point slides maximum.  Presentation Week 5. White paper due week 7.

See the guidelines on the Frohring Library website for White Papers: http://johncabot.libguides.com/EC480/white-papers

The Economics and Law of Sovereign Debt and Default Author(s) Ugo Panizza, Federico Sturzenegger and Jeromin Zettelmeyer, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 47, No. 3 (Sep., 2009), pp. 651-698,

To Judge Leviathan: Sovereign Credit Ratings, National Law, and the World Economy Author(s): Christopher M. Bruner and Rawi Abdelal, Journal of Public Policy, Vol. 25, No. 2 (May - Aug., 2005), pp. 191-217.

Sovereign Credit Rating Methodology: An Evaluation by Ashok Vir Bhatia, October 2002. IMF Working Paper.

Week 4 Tuesday February 6

Equity Research Presentation; report due.

Week 5  Tuesday, February 13

Sovereign bond white paper presentation.

Thesis statements handed in (email).

Week 6  Tuesday, February 20

Discussion questions assigned for class.

Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes? Author(s): Luigi Guiso, Paola Sapienza and Luigi Zingales Source: The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 20, No. 2 (Spring, 2006), pp. 23-48 Published by: American Economic Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30033649 Accessed: 03-09-2017 20:18 UTC

Unbalanced Growth - Discussion questions to prepare before class

Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth: The Anatomy of Urban Crisis Author(s): William J. Baumol Source: The American Economic Review, Vol. 57, No. 3 (Jun., 1967), pp. 415-426 Published by: American Economic Association 

Thesis statements presented.

Week 7 Tuesday, February 27

Sovereign Bond Paper due.

Discussion questions assigned for class.

Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms: by Elinor Ostrom, Joumal of Economic PerspectivesVolume 14, Number 3Summer 2000Pages 137-158

Week 8 Tuesday, March 6

Discussion question assigned for class.

Introduction to measuring wage discrimination (students should read briefly through Oaxaca paper before class as we will go over it in class:   Male Female Wage Discrimination in Urban Labor Markets, Author: Ronald Oaxaca, International Economic Review, Volume 14, Issue 3, October 1973 (693-709)

Bayesian Bigot? Statistical Discrimination, Stereotypes, and Employer Decision Making Author(s): Devah Pager and Diana Karafin Source:  Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 621, The Moynihan Report Revisited: Lessons and Reflections after Four Decades (Jan., 2009), pp. 70-93 Published by:  in association with the Sage Publications, Inc. American Academy of Political and Social Science Stable URL:  http://www.jstor.org/stable/40375833 Accessed: 19-04-2015 10:11 UTC

Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination Author(s): Marianne Bertrand and Sendhil Mullainathan Source:   The American Economic Review, Vol. 94, No. 4 (Sep., 2004), pp. 991-1013 Published by:  American Economic Association Stable URL:  http://www.jstor.org/stable/3592802 Accessed: 19-04-2015 09:58 UTC

Prepare an excel file of the Oaxaca wage discrimination file using the CPS May data for Week 7: demonstrate ability to clearly present and document and excel file.

Week 9 Tuesday, March 13

Review of paper in class.

Microeconomics: Private information, adverse selection and market failure.

Akerlof G. A., “The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84, 488-500, 1970.

URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1879431

Review of paper in class.

Spence M., “Job Market Signaling”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 87, 355-374, 1973.

URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1882010

Preliminary final paper presentations: outline of argument

Week 10 Tuesday, March 19

In class test on the CFA Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct

Discussion questions assigned for class.

Big Data: New Tricks for Econometrics Author(s): Hal R. Varian Source: The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 28, No. 2 (Spring 2014), pp. 3-27 Published by: American Economic Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23723482 Accessed: 20-05-2015 04:07 UTC

Big Data For Dummies  eBook Authors: Hurwitz, Judith; Nugent, Alan; Halper, Fern; Kaufman, Marcia; Kirsch, Dan

Published: For Dummies, 2013-04-02 ISBN: 9781118504222

Student presentations on Big Data examples.

Week 11 Tuesday, March 26

BLOCK CHAINS AND CRYPTOCURRENCY – STUDENT PRESENTATIONS AND DISCUSSIONS.

Week 12 Tuesday, April 10

No class.  Final Paper Preparation.

Week 13 Tuesday, April 17

Final paper presentations

Week 14 Tuesday, April 24Final paper presentations

Week 15: Final exam day and time scheduled by the University.