JCU Logo

JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY

COURSE CODE: "PL 315"
COURSE NAME: "Institutions and Policies of the European Union"
SEMESTER & YEAR: Spring 2017
SYLLABUS

INSTRUCTOR: Eszter Salgo
EMAIL: [email protected]
HOURS: TTH 1:30 PM 2:45 PM
TOTAL NO. OF CONTACT HOURS: 45
CREDITS: 3
PREREQUISITES: Prerequisite: PL 223
OFFICE HOURS: Tue/Thu 4.30-5.30 Tiber Campus, Facutly Room

COURSE DESCRIPTION:
This course aims to provide students with a firm understanding of the origins, dynamics, institutions, and policies central to the process of European integration. In so doing, students will examine such issues as the relationship among the different EU institutions, and their relationships with the Member States, as well as EU trade, monetary, foreign, and security policies.
SUMMARY OF COURSE CONTENT:

The first and the second sections of the course explore the politics and current institutions of the European Union (EU) and the historical process that has led to it. The third part provides an in-depth look at the complex nature of the EU’s identity politics. Through a multidisciplinary perspective and an interactive approach, it covers a wide range of topics such the relationship between identity and history, memory, culture, and nation; the visual representations of the organization; and the interactions between Europe and the “others.” Students will engage critically with the supranational elite’s attempt to deepen the integration process, build a strong community ‘based on shared values’ and shift citizens’ allegiance from the nation-state to the EU. Besides reflecting on the effects of the euro crisis and the refugee crisis, the course analyzes the roots and the consequences of the organization’s legitimacy crisis and its “democratic deficit.” Class discussions will seek to answer questions such as: What factors drive European countries’ response to the refugee crisis? How to explain the EU’s declining soft power? What does the proliferation of protest parties reveal about the nature of the integration process? How to explain the outcome of the Brexit referendum? What future for Transatlantic and EU-Russia relations? Has time come for a European Defense Union? Each student will present a case study (based on individual research) on one of the member states (illustrating the role it has been playing in the European Union and how citizens’ national and regional identities cohabit (or clash) with their European identity).



LEARNING OUTCOMES:

At the end of the course students should be able to:

  • possess in-depth knowledge of the processes that have led to today’s European Union;

  • describe in detail the main actors, institutions and policies in the EU;

  • understand how European integration processes has been analyzed from different theoretical perspectives in contemporary research;

  • evaluate critically the role of the EU as a global actor;

  • understand how the enlargements have changed the nature of the organization;

  • engage critically with the federalist agenda that has been driving the integration process;

  • interpret the various forms that the EU’s identity politics has been taken

  • understand the causes and the possible consequences of the contemporary challenges facing the EU: refugee crisis, Brexit, the future of transatlantic and EU-Russia relations, etc.

  • illustrate the problems relating to democracy in and legitimacy of the EU

  • possess skills and ability to independently explore, present and discuss issues related to European integration, both orally and in writing.

TEXTBOOK:
Book TitleAuthorPublisherISBN numberLibrary Call NumberCommentsFormatLocal BookstoreOnline Purchase
The European Union: How does it work? Daniel Kenealy Oxfrod University Press0199685371     
REQUIRED RESERVED READING:
NONE

RECOMMENDED RESERVED READING:
NONE
GRADING POLICY
-ASSESSMENT METHODS:
AssignmentGuidelinesWeight
Class attendance and participation in debatesClass attendance will be considered in combination with assessment of students’ active participation in general and specifically during the class debates. Students will not be penalized for two absences. If further absences are recorded, grade penalties will be applied. From one to four more absences will reduce the participation score by 5% for each absence. More than six total absences will result in the overall F.10%
Oral presentationEach student has to select one of the topics indicated in the annex of this syllabus and provide a 15 minute long oral presentation.Oral Presentation is graded on ability to provide a convincing comparative analysis, a coherent of explanation of factual/historical material and logical content of argument, ability to critically analyze alternative points of view and to provide satisfying answers to questions raised in the discussion.15%
Term paperEach student has to submit a term paper on the same topic (2000-2500 words, using APA citation style): research abstract (one paragraph which includes the title and a few sentences explaining the choice and the most important issues) with running bibliography should be handed in by February 2; the final research paper must submitted by April 13. The key to a successful research paper is the students’ ability to: back theses with specific evidence; draw on and cite correctly a wide range of the good, reliable and up-to-date sources (both scholarly and newspaper/magazine article); move beyond descriptive summary raising and produce a well-organized, clearly written, critical and persuasive analysis.25%
Midterm examThe midterm exam consists of test questions, short answers and essay questions. It test students on concepts and topics covered throughout the semester. Students are graded on accuracy, depth of analysis, logical content, creative thinking, on their ability to formulate a sophisticated argument, provide evidence for their statements, discuss and show understanding of alternative explanations.15%
   
Final examIn terms of structure, the final exam is similar to the midterm exam. It is cumulative.35%

-ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
AWork of this quality directly addresses the question or problem raised and provides a coherent argument displaying an extensive knowledge of relevant information or content. This type of work demonstrates the ability to critically evaluate concepts and theory and has an element of novelty and originality. There is clear evidence of a significant amount of reading beyond that required for the cour
BThis is highly competent level of performance and directly addresses the question or problem raised.There is a demonstration of some ability to critically evaluatetheory and concepts and relate them to practice. Discussions reflect the student’s own arguments and are not simply a repetition of standard lecture andreference material. The work does not suffer from any major errors or omissions and provides evidence of reading beyond the required assignments.
CThis is an acceptable level of performance and provides answers that are clear but limited, reflecting the information offered in the lectures and reference readings.
DThis level of performances demonstrates that the student lacks a coherent grasp of the material.Important information is omitted and irrelevant points included.In effect, the student has barely done enough to persuade the instructor that s/he should not fail.
FThis work fails to show any knowledge or understanding of the issues raised in the question. Most of the material in the answer is irrelevant.

-ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS:

ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS AND EXAMINATION POLICY



Class attendance is mandatory. Students will not be penalized for two absences. If further absences are recorded, grade penalties will be applied. From one to four more absences will reduce the participation score by 5% for each absence. More than six total absences will result in the overall F.

You cannot make-up a major exam (midterm or final) without the permission of the Dean’s Office. The Dean’s Office will grant such permission only when the absence was caused by a serious impediment, such as a documented illness, hospitalization or death in the immediate family (in which you must attend the funeral) or other situations of similar gravity. Absences due to other meaningful conflicts, such as job interviews, family celebrations, travel difficulties, student misunderstandings or personal convenience, will not be excused. Students who will be absent from a major exam must notify the Dean’s Office prior to that exam. Absences from class due to the observance of a religious holiday will normally be excused. Individual students who will have to miss class to observe a religious holiday should notify the instructor by the end of the Add/Drop period to make prior arrangements for making up any work that will be missed. The final exam period runs until ____________

ACADEMIC HONESTY
As stated in the university catalog, any student who commits an act of academic dishonesty will receive a failing grade on the work in which the dishonesty occurred. In addition, acts of academic dishonesty, irrespective of the weight of the assignment, may result in the student receiving a failing grade in the course. Instances of academic dishonesty will be reported to the Dean of Academic Affairs. A student who is reported twice for academic dishonesty is subject to summary dismissal from the University. In such a case, the Academic Council will then make a recommendation to the President, who will make the final decision.
STUDENTS WITH LEARNING OR OTHER DISABILITIES
John Cabot University does not discriminate on the basis of disability or handicap. Students with approved accommodations must inform their professors at the beginning of the term. Please see the website for the complete policy.

SCHEDULE

COURSE SCHEDULE

 

Week

 

Topic

 

Reading

 

Week 1

 

-  Introduction

-  History of the idea of Europe

 

 

-  P. Boer (1995), The History of the Idea of Europe, Essay 1

 

Week 2

 

-  Plans about a federal Europe from the interwar period

-  Understanding the EU from different theoretical perspectives

 

-  Delzell (1960), The European Federalist Movement in Italy: First Phase, 1918-1947

The Journal of Modern History, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 241-250; Villanueva (2005), Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi's "Pan-Europa" as the Elusive "Object of Longing" Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 67-80; Müller (2006) Julien Benda’s Anti-Passionate Europe, European Journal of Political Theory 5(2) 125–137

-  Textbook, Chapter 1

 

Week 3

 

-   The history of the integration process

-   The institutions of the European Union

 

-  Textbook Chapter 2

-  Textbook Chapter 3

 

Week 4

 

 

-   The member states of the European Union

-   Key policies in the European Union

 

-  Textbook Chapter 4

-  Textbook Chapter 5

 

Week 5

 

-   The policymaking process in the European Union

-   Democracy in the European Union

 

-   Textbook Chapter 6

-  Textbook Chapter 7

 

Week 6

 

-  EU expansion and wider Europe

-  The EU as a security actor

 

-  Textbook Chapter 8

-  Textbook Chapter 9

 

Week 7

 

-  The EU as a global actor

-  Review

 

-  Textbook Chapter 10

 

Week 8

 

-  Oral presentations

-  Midterm exam

 

 

 

Week 9

 

-  Oral presentations

-  Review of the midterm exam

 

 

 

Week 10

 

-  Communication Strategy as a Tool to Build a European Community

-  Building a European Community Through Symbol Politics

 

 -   European Commission (2014), The European Union explained: Europe in 12 lessons

-  S. Lucarelli, F. Cerutti, V. Schmidt (2011),  Debating Political Identity and Legitimacy in the European Union, Chapter 7;  F. Foret (2010), Rituals: a Challenging Tradition in the Making, In “International Political Anthropology”. Vol. 3, No. 1

 

Week 11

 

-  Constructing European Identity Through Intellectuals’ and Artists’ Narratives

-  Europa and the New Euro: Symbols of a New Europe Coming to Life

 

 

-   New Narrative for Europe  (2014); E. Salgó (2017) Images from Paradise: The Visual Communication of the European Union’s Federalist Utopia, New York: Berghahn Books, Chapter III.2

-   E. Salgó (2017) Images from Paradise: The Visual Communication of the European Union’s Federalist Utopia, New York: Berghahn Books, Chapter I

 

Week 12

 

BREAK

 

 

 

Week 13

 

- The EU’s Response to the Refugee Crisis 

-  Euroscepticism in EU Member States and the Brexit

 

-   J. Traub (2016) Europe Wishes to Inform You That the Refugee Crisis Is Over. But the humanitarian and political crises of the great Syrian exodus are just beginning. Foreign Policy

-   The Economist (2016) The Brexit briefs. Our guide to Britain’s EU referendum. B. B. Stokes (2016) Euroskepticism Beyond Brexit Significant opposition in key European countries to an ever-closer EU, EU Pew Research Center

 

Week 14

 

-   What Future for the EU-Russia Relations?

-   The EU’s Response to Terrorism and Radicalization in Europe

 

-   LSE Ideas (2016) Avoiding a New 'Cold War' The Future of EU-Russia Relations in the Context of the Ukraine Crisis, Part I; C. Bildt (2016) Russia, the European Union, and the Eastern Partnership, European Council on Foreign Relations  

-  Robert Schuman Foundation (2016) The European Union and the Fight to Counter Terrorism, European Issue 386

 

Week 15

 

-  What Future for the Transatlantic Relations and the European Defense Strategy?

 - Review

 

-  M. Becker (2016) Trump's Election Triggers Deep Concern in Europe, Spiegel; European Parliament (2016)  European Parliament resolution of 22 November 2016 on the European Defence Union